BBO Discussion Forums: Raising one's own preempts - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Raising one's own preempts ... never?

#1 User is offline   Blofeld 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 775
  • Joined: 2005-May-05
  • Location:Oxford
  • Interests:mathematics, science fiction, Tolkien, go, fencing, word games, board games, bad puns, juggling, Mornington Crescent, philosophy, Tom Lehrer, rock climbing, jootsing, drinking tea, plotting to take over the world, croquet . . . and most other things, really.

Posted 2006-September-30, 14:52

Scoring: MP
In first seat you open a weak-only multi 2♦. You may deplore the outside 4-card major, but this is ok by agreement.

LHO doubles (on asking, you are told that it is "takeout". "Takeout of what?", you ask. "Diamonds, of course" says the opponent and looks at you as if you are slightly crazy.

Partner bids 2♥, pass-or-correct.

RHO bids 3♣.

At this point you realise that you've miscounted your hand. You actually hold:


Scoring: MP


Bidding now doesn't exist systemically, so there's no danger that partner will play you for a strong hand.

But is it more dangerous to pass or to bid?

Is your answer affected by scoring or vulnerability?
0

#2 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2006-September-30, 15:46

It is WAY more risky to bid 3♠ now than opening 3♠ the first round.

Still, opps don't look too sharp, so you might get away with it. But I think they might have fixed themselves already. If LHO doesn't bid 3NT now, they'll have missed a game. Give him the chance to guess wrong: pass.
0

#3 User is offline   1eyedjack 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,575
  • Joined: 2004-March-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2006-September-30, 17:00

Blofeld, on Sep 30 2006, 09:52 PM, said:

LHO doubles (on asking, you are told that it is "takeout". "Takeout of what?", you ask. "Diamonds, of course" says the opponent and looks at you as if you are slightly crazy.

ROFL! Someone else has the same idea.

http://forums.bridgebase.com/index.php?sho...ndpost&p=151019
Psych (pron. saik): A gross and deliberate misstatement of honour strength and/or suit length. Expressly permitted under Law 73E but forbidden contrary to that law by Acol club tourneys.

Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. mPosted ImagesPosted ImagetPosted Imager-mPosted ImagendPosted Imageing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.

"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"

"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
0

#4 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2006-September-30, 20:59

A couple of points: you really shouldn't ask "Takeout ow what", though I garee with your sentiments. Secondly pass now. The opps have exchanegd information so coming in now is too risky. UNLESS- what systemically does your partner's 2H bid mean? You say P/C, but what would a pass have been? What would a xx have been. IF you pd's bid suggest tolerance for both Ms, I would press on 1 level. Do you have these agreements?
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#5 User is offline   Blofeld 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 775
  • Joined: 2005-May-05
  • Location:Oxford
  • Interests:mathematics, science fiction, Tolkien, go, fencing, word games, board games, bad puns, juggling, Mornington Crescent, philosophy, Tom Lehrer, rock climbing, jootsing, drinking tea, plotting to take over the world, croquet . . . and most other things, really.

  Posted 2006-October-01, 05:41

Ron: pass would have been a suggestion to play 2♦X, and XX would have been to play in his own suit (I'd bid 2♥ whatever my hand).

So 2♥ exludes a certain number of hands without any major suit tolerance. It also more-or-less denies 3 or more ♥s. So 1=2=5=5 or 1=2=4=6 might bid this way, but apart from that he'll have at least two spades, and I think he's odds on to have three (having denied three hearts).
0

#6 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2006-October-01, 05:53

I think 1=2=5=5 would be a pass of 2♦, it is only a suggestion to play after all. 1=2=4=6 is a 2♠ bid if I'm just trying to reach our best spot...but these things need to be mixed up a bit, you don't want 2♦:2♠, 3♥ telling the opps that we have a 9+card heart fit and that they have an 8+card spade fit.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users