BBO Discussion Forums: 2 club only as game forcing - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 club only as game forcing wonder why I've never seen it

#1 User is offline   bestguru 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 103
  • Joined: 2004-November-08

Posted 2006-September-26, 20:11

Do you all know of a natural system that uses 2♣ by responder as an artificial GF? I found the idea at the bottom of a bottle of wine, but it seems like it might have some advantages over 2/1. I know I'm not the first to think of it, but I've never seen it.

What do you think of the idea?
0

#2 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2006-September-26, 20:39

I'm not sure if this qualifies, but I have long known of a "system" of calls that approximates this.

A "Golady 2♣" call is a 2♣ response to an opening bid, artificially establishing a game force, with transfer rebids by opener. I still use this after minor openings. Golady had some asking bid structure following the transfer. Acceptance of the transfer agreed trumps and was a Top Control Asking Bid. Now, I just use cuebidding if the transfer is accepted.

Coupled with Golady was a bid called a "Toddler 2♦." I cannot remember the exact parameters, but I seem to recall that Toddler was a 2♦ call that was limited and showed 3+ diamonds, with some strange rebid structure.

I learned this is the context of a strange canape system, played by two guys who were just figuring out how to do this. Not all of what they played made sense, but I liked the Golady call, as I mentioned, and have adopted it in a limited fashion.

I think the grand guru of their thinking was someone from Canada -- not sure...
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#3 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,425
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-September-26, 20:44

bestguru, on Sep 26 2006, 09:11 PM, said:

Do you all know of a natural system that uses 2♣ by responder as an artificial GF? I found the idea at the bottom of a bottle of wine, but it seems like it might have some advantages over 2/1. I know I'm not the first to think of it, but I've never seen it.

What do you think of the idea?

If this is the biggest or one of the biggest problems in your game, you must be a true world class player. :).

I can think of a million more important issues. :D
0

#4 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2006-September-26, 23:45

Power uses 2C as an artificial game try and 2D as an artificial GF by responder. This works ok, but the relays get a bit high.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#5 User is offline   Impact 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 331
  • Joined: 2005-August-28

Posted 2006-September-27, 00:24

I think you'll find that it has been around for a very long time: Danielson's relay Precision circa mid to late 1970's offered 2C GF relay to all main range one-level bids, and 2D as an invitational bid (not natural either).

AFAK those responses (as opposed to continuations) were not ground-breaking at the time (other than perhaps their application to Precision).
0

#6 User is offline   Tola18 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 333
  • Joined: 2006-January-19
  • Location:Sweden
  • Interests:Cats.

Posted 2006-September-29, 03:47

I think this isnt uncommon, and dont need to be especially cerebreal. I know for sure some swedish players do play it, dont think they use it as complicated.

I know also it is in WJ2005, as 2NT jacoby there is inviting. (not "at least inviting" as is common in Sweden).
There are no complicated relay-schemes here no.


Although there are surely those who do complicate thing either it is necessary or not. :P
Cats bring joy and a feeling of harmony and well-being into a home.
Many homeless cats seek a home.
Adopt one. Contact a cat shelter!
You too can be an everyday hero. :)
0

#7 User is offline   Kaapo 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 75
  • Joined: 2004-July-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Finland

Posted 2006-September-29, 11:34

kenrexford, on Sep 26 2006, 09:39 PM, said:

Coupled with Golady[2♣] was a bid called a "Toddler 2♦."  I cannot remember the exact parameters, but I seem to recall that Toddler was a 2♦ call that was limited and showed 3+ diamonds, with some strange rebid structure.
...
I think the grand guru of their thinking was someone from Canada -- not sure...

You mean this stuff: Colin Ward's Bridge Page.

It has Toddler and Golady along with two slightly lunatic bidding systems; Canadian Club and Valentines.
I just discovered a truly remarkable bidding system!
Sadly, this margin was too small to contain it.
0

#8 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2006-September-29, 15:32

Thanks for the link.

I found the bidding system used by the people who introduced me to Golady also somewhat lunatic. However, from the minds of the insane occasionally come some good ideas...
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users