Your bid. Do you agree/disagree with my bidding so far?
SAYC Bidding Problem We don't play support doubles
#2
Posted 2006-September-03, 01:23
#3
Posted 2006-September-03, 01:44
I agree with Sceptic that I wouldn't open this hand, but it's not so far from an opening that the bidding problem isn't reasonable.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#4
Posted 2006-September-03, 02:02
#5
Posted 2006-September-03, 03:11
Does he have 10-12? Bid 2 Spade.
BTW: What does 2 Heart promise? If he has say 2425 or 2416, why didn´t he double? Had this been penalty? Is this the answer to the question?
I think with a real good hand, he could have made a little more, so I bid 2 Spade now.
And this would have been always a hand for an opening bid for me....
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#6
Posted 2006-September-03, 05:04
awm, on Sep 3 2006, 02:44 AM, said:
<snip>
Since Pass was forcing, your Pass simpy showed
interest in looking for a penalty, i.e. bidding 2S now,
may even show a stronger hand, than if you would
have bid it direct.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#7
Posted 2006-September-03, 05:07
I Pass.
2H does not promise add. values,
since Pass was forcing.
I have garbage, I am content to have
found a resting place.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: I am not reallysure, I would have
opened, but if you do, and if this is your
partnership style, than the bidding so far,
was fine.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8
Posted 2006-September-03, 05:24
P_Marlowe, on Sep 3 2006, 11:07 AM, said:
I Pass.
2H does not promise add. values,
since Pass was forcing.
I have garbage, I am content to have
found a resting place.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: I am not reallysure, I would have
opened, but if you do, and if this is your
partnership style, than the bidding so far,
was fine.
Do you really have garbage? You have the K (albeit singelton) in partner's first suit; the Ace and some length in his second; three of the top five honours in your suit and no wasted values in ♦.
#9
Posted 2006-September-03, 05:39
EricK, on Sep 3 2006, 06:24 AM, said:
P_Marlowe, on Sep 3 2006, 11:07 AM, said:
I Pass.
2H does not promise add. values,
since Pass was forcing.
I have garbage, I am content to have
found a resting place.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: I am not reallysure, I would have
opened, but if you do, and if this is your
partnership style, than the bidding so far,
was fine.
Do you really have garbage? You have the K (albeit singelton) in partner's first suit; the Ace and some length in his second; three of the top five honours in your suit and no wasted values in ♦.
Ok, ignore the word garbage, although
since I promised an opening bid, I still
think I am min.
But ask yourself, where do you wanna go?
3NT? After partner failed to make
a dbl?
hearts, clubs, spades?, in a 7 card fit?
(If we ignore the possibility of a 6-5
distributon with partner.)
Game may be on, but I woul bet my
money on it, that anything higher than
the 3 level is going down.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#10
Posted 2006-September-03, 06:16
#11
Posted 2006-September-03, 09:23
Now I bid 3H. Since no one else chose this, I'll explain:
If I open 1S and partner bids 2C (not gf in Sayc, but a decent hand) then, over 2D, I'll bid my hearts anytime I have four of them. I don't think it shows even a Jack extra. Partner has values, I have values, I'll bid my shape. Ergo, when I pass 2D I don't have four hearts. It could be best to pass 2H but I really don't think I can, and my pass of 2D followed by my raise to 3H should clarify the situation for partner. If 3H is already too high, that's tough, but he bid hearts, my hearts are about as good as they can be after my pass of 2D, so 3H it is. He might pass and make it, he might (unlikely) now bid 3N, he might now bid 3S (hopefully on Ax and good stuff), etc.
My rho has come in vulnerable against not, at imps, against the auction 1S-pass-2C. Looking at my diamonds, I seriously doubt partner has many.
#12
Posted 2006-September-03, 11:02
I choose the lesser of all evils and show support with support....3H. He will bid 3N if it is right.
#13
Posted 2006-September-03, 11:43
I imagine the bidding would have started P (P) 1♣ (1♦) 1♠ (P). Now partner will probably not be strong enough to reverse (if he is then anybody who passes in the original problem has made the wrong choice!), so will probably rebid 2♣. Now what are we going to do? maybe cuebid 2♦ and get 2♥ from partner. So we are in the same situation as in the OP.
#14
Posted 2006-September-03, 12:37
Responder's 2H is a new suit. That is 100% forcing. We cannot pass.
Our pass of 2D says, "I don't have a good bid here." So what have we denied so far? 4♥, 4♣, 6♠, and a ♦ stopper. We have to bid, so bid 2S, our cheapest bid, which says, "I still don't have a good bid here."
3H is tempting but responder will be tapped in diam. If our hand was KQxxx Axx xx Kxx, 3H would be OK.
#15
Posted 2006-September-03, 18:57
#16
Posted 2006-September-03, 22:48
#17
Posted 2006-September-04, 00:02
1. (5% of the time) 5-6 in the round suits - this will take care of itself regardless
2. (75% of the time) 4-5 or 4-6 in the rounds, or
3. (20% of the time) 2-3-3-6 or 1-3-3-6 and too good to bid 3♣ which might be passed in SAYC
This makes raising hearts an absolute no, no since the diamond tap will be in the wrong hand. Passing is very, very wrong since my submini dog of an opener is OK now that pard has bid clubs. I like 2♠ with the good 5 bagger. 3♦ is a survival bid, and should work OK.
The opposite hand:
AJ
KJ107
A10
J9862
3NT makes if you finesse the overcaller for the heart queen. 4♠ can be beaten with a trump out, otherwise it makes if you guess the heart. 4♥ goes down on a 4-2 trump split even if you do guess the heart.
#18
Posted 2006-September-04, 00:10
#19
Posted 2006-September-04, 01:00
jdeegan, on Sep 4 2006, 01:02 AM, said:
The opposite hand:
AJ
KJ107
A10
J9862
3NT makes if you finesse the overcaller for the heart queen. 4♠ can be beaten with a trump out, otherwise it makes if you guess the heart. 4♥ goes down on a 4-2 trump split even if you do guess the heart.
You forgot to mention that 2D goes
down, -2 most of the time, which will
net 500, if responder doubles.
Your game contracts need correct
guessing, and since I quite often guess
wrong, I take happily my plus score
defeating 2Dx,
... and I will take my plus score in 2H,
altough I would ask partner why he did
not dbl 2D.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: I take it, that responder would also bid the
same without the Jacks, and at least the Jack
of spade is needed to make 3NT playable,
unless you will rely on spades 3-3.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#20
Posted 2006-September-04, 08:53
By the way, the overcaller, unless he is nuts, has at least six diamonds and the ace of clubs. I am playing him for heart shortness and losing the finesse.
Added later: And if pard bids 3H over 2H, certainly now 3NT is reasonable, showing a diamond control and offering the choice of the 4-3 fit or 3N. Partner will have no trouble choosing.
I have no strong disagreement with 2S instead of 3H, although I prefer 3H. It shows more of what you hold, and it should get you to 3N. I don't care so much for 3D since I think that should be something where you can place a pretty strong bet on nine tricks assuming only that partner controls diamonds. With scattered values as are held in opener's hand, I think it better to continue showing where the values are rather than just ask for a D stop. I don't think 3D is awful, but I would rank the choices 3H, 2S, 3D. Nothing I see in the hands changes my mind about this.

Help

1♠-P-2♣-2♦
P-P-2♥-P
????