4216 over 3D
#1
Posted 2006-August-24, 16:39
What is your plan?
Arend
#2
Posted 2006-August-24, 16:55
I just hate getting yelled at by my partners when I go past 3NT.
Waiting to see the 3S bidders here.
#5
Posted 2006-August-24, 23:12
I know the contract will be 4H. It just will. So, I plan on buying two beers because partner will have pulled it in or partner will not. Celebration or pay back, I am not sure.
(I doubled)
-P.J. Painter.
#6
Posted 2006-August-24, 23:46
I loathe doubling because pard might be bidding a 4 card heart suit (yuck!).
I bid 4♣ and hope for the best.
#7
Posted 2006-August-25, 00:18
4 ♣ if this shows a two suiter with clubs...
And I like the idea with the two beers. I will buy two more.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#8
Posted 2006-August-25, 00:31
It could, of course, go badly wrong, but then so could anything else. At least double keeps 3NT in the frame and allows us to find a spade fit if partner happens to have both majors (and is longer in spades OR has enough strength to cue-bid)
#9
Posted 2006-August-25, 02:49
Last time my partner had this shape we bid
3D x P 3H
P 4C P 4S
all pass
I think double-then-4C shows this sort of hand (or possibly 3316). I had a very weak 4423 and 4S made.
#10
Posted 2006-August-25, 03:05
Dbl followed by 4♣ seems also reasonable.
I would NEVER bid 4♣ as 2-suiter since I'm waaaaay too weak for that.
#11
Posted 2006-August-25, 03:51
No ELC: dbl, and pass pard's heart bid.
#12
Posted 2006-August-25, 07:14
A lot of great stories from great players focus on the 4-2 major fit coming in.
-P.J. Painter.
#13
Posted 2006-August-25, 07:55
Free, on Aug 25 2006, 10:05 AM, said:
Dbl followed by 4♣ seems also reasonable.
I would NEVER bid 4♣ as 2-suiter since I'm waaaaay too weak for that.
I'd be a bit wary about 'should show my hand: no diamond stopper'
If you had, say,
AKx(x)
KQx
Ax
Qxxx(x)
wouldn't you like to double then bid 3NT showing roughly take-out double shape and values with a diamond stop, but not certain 3NT is right?
#14
Posted 2006-August-25, 09:04
#15
Posted 2006-August-25, 09:59
-P.J. Painter.
#16
Posted 2006-August-25, 10:39
Let's take my sample hand.
You hold
AKx(x)
KQx
Ax
Qxxx(x)
and RHO opens 3D
You have two alternative calls:
i) double, then bid 3NT over 3M or pass 4M
ii) 3NT
I really fail to see the merits of the immediate 3NT call, which both wrongsides the 3NT contract and means that you play 3NT rather than a simple 4M opposite something like xxx Axxxx x KJxx, and 3NT rather than a simple 6M opposite QJxxx Ax xx AJxx.
Bidding 3NT at once only gains when partner bids 4M or 4C over the double, and you have 9 tricks in 3NT but don't have game in a suit contract. This is pretty rare, especially when you have such hard diamond values.
#17
Posted 2006-August-25, 10:45
The more I think about it, though, I am leaning back to the double. Sure, "bid 3NT when plausible" is a good rule. But, perhaps the onus should be on partner to bid 3NT when he lacks a major, stopper or no stopper, most of the time...
-P.J. Painter.
#18
Posted 2006-August-25, 14:31
FrancesHinden, on Aug 25 2006, 10:49 AM, said:
Ok, that was my plan, too. Of course partner bids 4H, I pass, and this gets doubled by LHO, passed around to me.
What do you do?
Arend
#19
Posted 2006-August-25, 15:07
Being a cheap bastard, I pass.
-P.J. Painter.

Help
