Stayman or Jacoby or ? How to bid that one ?
#1
Posted 2006-August-15, 17:57
My partner open 1NT.
I had this hand :
♠ K963 ♥ KJ87532 ♦ ____ ♣ J2
What do I bid ? And what is the continuation ?
Thank you
#2
Posted 2006-August-15, 18:37
A possible sequence would be 1 NT - 2 ♣ * (Stayman)
2 ♦ - 4 ♦ * (Delayed Texas transfer)
4 ♥
I believe that partner will have some type of play for the game more times than not.
If you don't feel like gambling and are playing Garbage or (Drop Dead Stayman)
a possible sequence would be, 1 NT - 2 ♣ * (Stayman)
2 ♦ - 2 ♥ (Weak for passing)
Of course if partner responds with a major you would decide whether to pass or put him into game. Personally I would go for the game.
Cheers, Theo
#4
Posted 2006-August-15, 18:43
I'd probably just bid 4♦ as a transfer to Hearts, however, unless I have some kind of exclusion keycard available, I'm not sure that I'd bother looking for 6
#5
Posted 2006-August-15, 18:50
Perhaps it might be best to transfer to the known, at least 9 card trump fit.
And there's a chance that you might play in a 4-4♠ fit while there's a 9 card ♥ fit available by going through stayman. Here the problem comes when ♥ ruffs exists, something like ♥ lead, ♥ ruff, ♣A, ♥ruff.
The only time 4♠ is necessary is when you really need the extra tricks generated by the 4-4 fit after taking a few ♦ ruffs but it looks like in ♥s you should enough tricks most of the time.
#6
Posted 2006-August-15, 19:02
#7
Posted 2006-August-15, 21:08
Perhaps Jacoby followed by a jump to 4D as a splinter might work out, but I can see PD carrying on with hands that aren't safe to do so.
Just my opinion ... neilkaz ..
#8
Posted 2006-August-15, 21:11
#9
Posted 2006-August-15, 21:16
For game consideration, I'm certain that the long trump will play better even you have 44 fit in ♠. The only exception perhaps is that you have a 54 ♠ fit. Even so, you may be tapped out of trumps to enjoy your long H (this will be more true if your hand is even weaker. In general, try to play in the long suit held by the weak hand).
#11
Posted 2006-August-20, 14:52
I hope we are not playing this as a transfer. Personally I think the benefits of keeping the distributional hand hidden from the defense outweigh the benefits of having the strong but well-defined hand as declarer. The unrevealed diamond void and/or 4 card spade holding could well be worth a trick or two on misdefense.
#12
Posted 2006-August-20, 16:17
#13
Posted 2006-August-20, 16:50
#14
Posted 2006-August-31, 04:48
my intermediate opinion
With this hand i want my part to bid the game (have to force) 4♥.
For small slam, my part should have ♠AQx ♥Ax or Qx ♦no matter ♣AK. This hand is possible to my part hand, or not? I like to try a slam verification.
So .. i like this auction:
1NT - 2♦
2♥ - 2♠! GF, 4x♠ and 5+x♥ and a nice hand.
now here my part should bid his hand:
- weak/strong, with/without 3x♥'s
- weak/strong, with/without 4x♠'s
etc.. even then i have room to bid 4♦ cuebid if my part have a strong hand with fit... or show 6x♥ .. or whatever i want to show .. or not
Regards, Adi Bichea (BIL member)
♣♦♥♠
#16
Posted 2006-August-31, 05:40
In my experience using 4♦/4♥ as transfers is something that is far more popular in the ACBL than in the UK. Frequently you will find that people use a South African Texas style, with 4♣/4♦ being transfers and 4♥/4♠ being natural - but this treatment means that you cannot use Gerber (a major problem for some, of course).
Paul

Help
