BBO Discussion Forums: 9-15 5-card major openings - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

9-15 5-card major openings

#1 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2006-August-25, 08:23

1) The auction begins 1-(2) and you hold:

a) xxx Ax KQJxxx Qx
bee) xx Ax KQJxxx Qxx
c) xx K107x KQ7x Jxx (partner reopens with a double)

Do you do the same thing that you would do with these types of hands in standard (if you held 2 fewer HCP) or do you have a different philosophy?

-Noble
0

#2 User is offline   keylime 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: FD TEAM
  • Posts: 2,735
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nashville, TN
  • Interests:Motorsports, cricket, disc golf, and of course - bridge. :-)

  Posted 2006-August-25, 21:22

a) xxx Ax KQJxxx Qx
bee) xx Ax KQJxxx Qxx
c) xx K107x KQ7x Jxx (partner reopens with a double)

Hand 1: That six card suit is rather alluring, and with the A-x of hearts being offensive values, you need some mechanism to find out if pard has a full opener versus a shape hand (this predicates that 9-10 point balanced hands are mostly passed initially). With Larry and I we use 2NT as either an offensive limit raise or a weak hand that's getting out in 3 of a suit beneath opener - this is a clear 2NT call.

Hand 2: Missing that 3rd spade, bidding 3 seems right, but can really hang partner if they opened a 9-10 count with spades-clubs. However, double leaves you in a worse situation - if LHO trots out their cutesy courtesy raise you're in trouble. I think you got to bid and hope for the best - the 5-2 4S game looks reasonable on this layout and you're ruffing hearts in the right hand.

Hand 3: Pard was kind enough to reopen for us, showing a full hand with tolerance for anything you call. If playing MPs, I pass and try for a top - with that nice side suit of diamonds and probably 2 heart winners in the slot, the field in general may not a) reopen with a double, B) may stretch to a contract that has poor play and c) +300/+500 should get you a good segment of MPs, only losing to the game bids that are making, which is unlikely - pard probably has 2 hearts. However at IMPs, things become a little different because of the fear of -470/-670, especially at Swiss. At Swiss I take a call out of fear that if red on white, a double swing might occur. At KO's, it depends on where you are in the match - if behind you probably are swinging at it is and therefore you're put to a guess on what your counterparts' actions will be; I pass and try for the maximum simply because the caliber of opponents we play at would make the same types of actions. If ahead tho, I take insurance and make a call - probably 2NT feels right.
"Champions aren't made in gyms, champions are made from something they have deep inside them - a desire, a dream, a vision. They have to have last-minute stamina, they have to be a little faster, they have to have the skill and the will. But the will must be stronger than the skill. " - M. Ali
0

#3 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,310
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2006-August-26, 00:40

This depends a bit on the style of 9-15 opening. If you open basically "all 9s" then I agree with treating the responding hand as 2 points lighter and bidding accordingly. Thus I would make a limit raise on the first hand, double (planning to correct to diamonds) on the second, and pass on the third (close between pass and 2 though and might chicken out at IMPs).

However, the style of 9-15 opening I typically play (which I think you play also) generally opens 7 loser hands, and in the presence of a real fit one can bid as though opener had serious values. In this case I game force on hand one (fit jump perhaps?), but still double first on hand two and have the same decision on hand three.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users