BBO Discussion Forums: To bid or not to bid....invitational - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

To bid or not to bid....invitational or forcing, that is the question..

Poll: How to respond to 3[he] (26 member(s) have cast votes)

How to respond to 3[he]

  1. Invitational (25 votes [96.15%])

    Percentage of vote: 96.15%

  2. Forcing (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. Other? (1 votes [3.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.85%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-July-28, 06:17

Hand to follow....without interference, on the sequence 1 1 1 3 is 3H invitational or forcing?
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#2 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2006-July-28, 06:36

Without any specific agreement otherwise, invitational.
0

#3 User is offline   joker_gib 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,384
  • Joined: 2004-February-16
  • Location:Belgium

Posted 2006-July-28, 07:38

FrancesHinden, on Jul 28 2006, 01:36 PM, said:

Without any specific agreement otherwise, invitational.

I agree and think it's fairly standard to go through 4SF to have a forcing sequence, isn't it ?

Alain
Alain
0

#4 User is offline   SoTired 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,016
  • Joined: 2005-June-20
  • Location:Lovettsville, VA

Posted 2006-July-28, 07:49

After 1C 1H 1S:
weak: pass, 1N, 2C, 2H, 2S
invite: 2N, 3C, 3H, 3S, 3D(/ 55)
GF: 2D (4SF), 3N, 4C, 4D (splinter with spade support), 4H, 4S
It costs nothing to be nice -- my better half
0

#5 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2006-July-28, 08:48

Since 1-2 is still GF in most standard descriptions, the auction above is invitational... When not playing GF jumps, you need specific agreements about sequences like these. Bidding through 4th suit GF or invite is most important.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#6 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2006-July-28, 08:54

joker_gib, on Jul 28 2006, 08:38 AM, said:

FrancesHinden, on Jul 28 2006, 01:36 PM, said:

Without any specific agreement otherwise, invitational.

I agree and think it's fairly standard to go through 4SF to have a forcing sequence, isn't it ?

Alain

Agreed !!
0

#7 User is offline   adhoc3 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 247
  • Joined: 2005-September-16

Posted 2006-July-28, 09:09

Given 4th suit forcing is on(this is not a problem I believe), 3H is invitational as for me. 7 cards or more, need some control, a hand better than bidding 2H.
0

#8 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2006-July-28, 11:45

i'd consider 3H there to be from 9-11/12 points, invitational
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#9 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,826
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-July-28, 15:44

Hi,

first question, what would a 2H response
to the opening bid mean?
Strong / weak / ultra weak ?

if strong => inv.
if Weak => forcing
if Ultra weak => inv.

If reverse Flannery => inv.
(depends on your 4th suit forcing agreements)

With kind reards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#10 User is offline   zasanya 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 747
  • Joined: 2003-December-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thane,Mumbai,Maharashtra,India
  • Interests:Chess,Scrabble,Bridge

Posted 2006-July-30, 07:44

I voted other
With my regular P 3 preemptive 4+cards .2=3 card support passable
2nt= support invitational and 2=forcing.
YUK thought opps were bidding 1 and 1.Sorry

This post has been edited by zasanya: 2006-July-31, 01:39

Aniruddha
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
0

#11 User is offline   sfbp 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 249
  • Joined: 2003-March-14
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-July-30, 09:07

another plug for XYZ

This scheme allows you to have it all:

immediate weak jumps over 1 (to 2) 0-6 HCP

after given sequence:
Pass "i made my one and only bid" 5-6 points 4-5 hearts, tolerance
2 drop dead, probably 5 cards, 7-9 points (less HCP with no spade tolerance)
2 some invitational hand (pard doesnt know which yet, he has to bid 2)
2 game forcing 5 hearts (possibly some other pattern and not giving up on slam)
3 game forcing (the STRONG JUMP SHIFT hand)
2N 4 hearts 5-6 clubs, less than game, pd must bid 3


(and there are various other possibilities too, notice the unbid sequences). For example your 3 bid after the 2 2 puppet/relay can be the same hand in standard that you intend by 3 in the original point, ie invitational with 6 s.

No special need to learn all this in detail - once you have the structure the meaning of the bids becomes clear.

Stephen
Stephen Pickett
co-founder HomeBase Club, author of BRidgeBRowser
0

#12 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2006-July-30, 23:56

In standard its invitationnal. You have to bid 4th suit to set up GF.

But its a lame way to play.

A better way is using 4th suit as all the invitationnal hand and the 2nd level bid arte to play and all jump as GF but nobody play this way.

Ben
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#13 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2006-July-31, 01:01

benlessard, on Jul 31 2006, 03:56 PM, said:

In standard its invitationnal. You have to bid 4th suit to set up GF.

But its a lame way to play.

A better way is using 4th suit as all the invitationnal hand and the 2nd level bid arte to play and all jump as GF but nobody play this way.

Ben

There is a reason why n one plays it your way. With a good hand the slow approach is necessary to elicit more information. Your approach is not very sensible.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#14 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2006-July-31, 01:18

Quote

      There is a reason why n one plays it your way. With a good hand the slow approach is necessary to elicit more information. Your approach is not very sensible. 



i agree that with slammish hand the slow way is preferable. But playing at the 2 level with invitationnal hand is so much more important.


standard way

1d--1s--1nt-- 3s INV

1d--1h--1s----3h INV

1d --1h--1s---2c---???----2 or 3h GF

1d--1s---1nt----2c---???---2 or 3s GF


1d--1s---1nt---2h followed by 3h or 3h directly (to play)



Reversed way

1d--1s--1nt-- 3s GF

1d--1h--1s----3h GF

1d --1h--1s---2c---???----2 or 3h INV

1d--1s---1nt----2c---???---2 or 3s INV

1d--1s---1nt---2h To play



I can tell you that you will gain many imps by playing the reversed method or something similar.


a shapely 10-11 pts facing a minimum opening often go down at the 3 level.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users