Pass or Pull?
#1
Posted 2006-July-24, 18:29
♠AQ9xx, ♥A9xx, ♦98xx, ♣---
2 passes to you and you open 1♠. Pard bids a SF 1N. You try 2♥, p, p, 3♣ on your right, you pass, LHO passes and pard greets it with a x.
Do you sit or not?
#4
Posted 2006-July-25, 05:34
Here, we know that there are a certain number of hands where partner will double and it is right to pull. Equally, there will be some where it is right to double. It's guessing which is more likely (along with the associated gains and losses: relevant even at matchpoints!) that's the question. My instinct here is that pass is better in the long run.
I certainly can't know that partner is salivating, though.
#5
Posted 2006-July-25, 06:09
Sorry, I doubt that and run.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#6
Posted 2006-July-25, 07:56
#7
Posted 2006-July-25, 09:50
If this were imps, I'd pass like a shot, since partner, knowing that I could be this weak, will have 3♣ beaten opposite this hand. He won't be afraid to pass and collect +50 if his hand is not truly good defensively.
But at mps, we were about to play 2♥ in an uncontested auction... he expected us to get a modest plus score and he cannot pass 3♣ merely because we MIGHT have this piece of c**p. We MIGHT have this, but we might equally well hold AKxx Axxx Kxx x, for example.
Add to the mix the fact that he did not bid over 2♥ and the odds are getting pretty good that the opps hold more hcp than we do.. and while hcp are far from everything, they also hold more trump than we do ... and that is not a healthy sign.
I say this knowing full well that I may be turning a plus into a minus. I also say this as someone who, when playing with a less-experienced partner for the first time, always tells partners, during the pre-game discussion: never pull my penalty doubles
#8
Posted 2006-July-25, 11:13
#9
Posted 2006-July-25, 11:28
Most likely if partner had four hearts he would not be doubling here. If partner had two spades and three hearts he correct to spades. So partner probably has some pattern like 1345 or possibly 1354 with good clubs. In any case I will lead the spade ace and continue a spade for partner to ruff. Even if pd has only one natural trump trick and no diamond cards, we may set via two aces, two ruffs, and partners trump trick. And who knows, partner can be 1336 and this could go for a huge number.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#10
Posted 2006-July-25, 11:29
#11
Posted 2006-July-25, 12:08
#12
Posted 2006-July-25, 14:26
I held this hand and passed. -570 later I was wondering if I did the right thing.
I thought the E player bid the hand a little strangely. I'd open, and if I passed, I'd certainly find a call over 1N.
I gave the hand to Chris Larsen who thought pass was pretty clear too. He thought pard should have a maximum of 2 spades and 3 hearts and thought a club stack was fairly evident. I appreciate Mikeh's comments and they echoed what my other regular partner said - who pulls.
My thoughts: Sure we are in 3rd chair, but this is a hand that everyone opens. I'm a little worried about my club void but my major suit aces are huge here. Why can't pard hold something more like: x Kxxx, Kxxx, QJTx?
#13
Posted 2006-July-25, 14:46
Can't really blame partner too much for not bidding 3H in pass out seat, either, as his hand looks pretty defensive as well. Maybe the real problem is north did not raise 2H to 3H the first time. Seems to have not done so is somewhat wishy-washy: pass the first time in case you have opened light, then double the second time around in case you have full values.
#14
Posted 2006-July-25, 14:52
did I open in 3rd seat?
Did partner see, that
I opened in 3rd seat?
Yes.
Do I have place to hide?
No.
=> Pass.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: I dont like the double by partner,
he has a fit, he has the King of spades
and shortage in spade.
Either he passes or he bids 3H, direct
or delayed, I prefer direct, after all I
could have a real opener, and if they
dont bid 3C we may miss game.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#15
Posted 2006-July-25, 15:17
I think I am convinced I should have passed the x of clubs, pls change my vote.
#16
Posted 2006-July-25, 16:08
Then he compounded matters by making a fit-denying penalty double.
While I can understand (and came very, very close to making) the pass of the double by south, I cannot come close to condoning N's actions.
#17
Posted 2006-July-25, 16:17
His decision to cloud the issue by doubling rather than balancing 3H is a VERY poor one.
Why cloud the issue when you have at least 8 cards in H ?
It is important to not makes bids that may be missinterpreted and result in a disaster, and if this was a card showing or cooperative double, then that is just what happened.
#18
Posted 2006-July-26, 01:29
#19
Posted 2006-July-26, 01:37
Partner bid very badly by doubling and should also have to 3H ather than passing 2 on the previous round.
Get a new partner.

Help
