lenght or suit quality
#1
Posted 2006-July-11, 02:07
Kx
Kx
AKQx
8xxxx
what is your bid what is your follow up.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#2
Posted 2006-July-11, 02:35
1♠ - 2♣
2♦ - 3♦
...
2♥ - 2NT
...
2♠* - 3♠
...
2NT - 3NT
...
3♣ - 3♦
* I bid my longest suit first regardless of quality.
** shows 6+ in my world after a 2♣ response.
Roland
#3
Posted 2006-July-11, 05:45
Walddk, on Jul 11 2006, 03:35 AM, said:
2♦ - 3♦
...
2♥ - 2NT
...
2♠* - 3♠
...
2NT - 3NT
...
3♣ - 3♦
* I bid my longest suit first regardless of quality.
** shows 6+ in my world after a 2♣ response.
Roland
Same except for the 2nd one. I'd bid 3N showing 15-17.
#4
Posted 2006-July-11, 07:02
#5
Posted 2006-July-11, 07:39
2C.
Over 2S, I bid 3D, which shows 5-4,
I take it that 2S in this seq. does not
promise a 6 card.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#6
Posted 2006-July-11, 13:01
I am about to disagree with you all, but I currently feel strongly that one should respond 2 diamonds. If this hand belongs in clubs, partner will bid them. I believe in bidding where my values are located. If one responds 2C, in a close slam investigation, opener is likely to assume that some of your values are in your first bid suit. In addition, i now have no rebid problems should partner rebid 2H or 2S: I can either take a preference to spades or rebid a forcing 2NT despite my strong club stopper, and see what 3rd bid partner makes.
All of the above assumes that one is playing 2/1GF. If not playing 2/1 and if playing that an initial 2NT response is forcing, then I might select a different initial action.
DHL
#7
Posted 2006-July-11, 13:51
There was a hand type quqite similar to this in the spingold finals one year. World champions at both tables bid the strong 4 card minor rather than the weak 5 card suit. Maybe these guys knew what they were doing, but it seems to me that concentrated values will be move useful knowledge to partner than a suit he would have to have great cards in before you would consider reaching for slam.
#8
Posted 2006-July-11, 14:02
However, we will have difficulty making slam in ♣ unless his hand is strong enough that he will at some point be able to bid ♣ naturally.
We will most definitely NOT want partner to get excited about Axxx in ♣, as he might well do after a 2♣ response.
Picture AQxxx Axx x Kxxx.... wouldn't we all get really happy if we opened 1♠ and heard 2♣?
We'd feel committed to ♣, and on a bad day even 5 is too much.
On the other hand, compare AQxxxx Ax Jxxx x after 2♣. We'd not like our hand very much and there is an argument for 2♠ rather than 2♦.
When you are considering a suit as trump for a high-level contract, suit quality counts and I agree 100% with 2♦
BTW, I believe that the sequence 1♠ 2♦ 3♣ shows extras so on that auction, I'd be willing to look into ♣ as a trump suit.. after all, for slam purposes the 5th card is worth the Q when partner announces a decent suit...
#9
Posted 2006-July-11, 14:32
Partner will play me for 14-15 hcp and stoppers in h and D, less than 3s and therefore not great clubs.
#10
Posted 2006-July-11, 16:21
partner bid 2h.
1s----2c----2h----???
over 2nt or 3d he will bid 3nt.
over 2s he will bid 3s.
1s----2d----2h---- ???
over 3clubs or 2nt or 2s he will bid 3d....now what ?
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#11
Posted 2006-July-11, 16:25
benlessard, on Jul 11 2006, 05:21 PM, said:
partner bid 2h.
1s----2c----2h----???
over 2nt or 3d he will bid 3nt.
over 2s he will bid 3s.
1s----2d----2h---- ???
over 3clubs or 2nt or 2s he will bid 3d....now what ?
1s=2c
2h=2nt
3nt=p
seems like a typical everyday auction.
My partner knows I got 14-15/16 hcp, 2 spades and D stoppers. Balanced or semi-balanced hand
#12
Posted 2006-July-11, 16:56
Winston
#13
Posted 2006-July-11, 18:18
I initially responded 2 diamonds.
Over 2H I shall bid 2NT (forcing in 2/1)
over 3D I shall bid 3S.
I'm liking my initial 2D response more and more: starting to look like a 30 hcp deck for this hand.
Is partner now bidding 3NT?
DHL
#14
Posted 2006-July-11, 18:21
Double !, on Jul 11 2006, 07:18 PM, said:
I initially responded 2 diamonds.
Over 2H I shall bid 2NT (forcing in 2/1)
over 3D I shall bid 3S.
Is partner now bidding 3NT?
DHL
#15
Posted 2006-July-11, 18:24
post said that opener rebid 3D over 2S, 2NT, or 3C.
DHL
#16
Posted 2006-July-11, 18:26
Double !, on Jul 11 2006, 07:18 PM, said:
I initially responded 2 diamonds.
Over 2H I shall bid 2NT (forcing in 2/1)
over 3D I shall bid 3S.
I'm liking my initial 2D response more and more: starting to look like a 30 hcp deck for this hand.
Is partner now bidding 3NT?
DHL
I bid exactly the same way.
#17
Posted 2006-July-11, 18:28
Another rule: don't bid bad suits in a potential slam auction.
#18
Posted 2006-July-11, 20:17
#19
Posted 2006-July-11, 23:28

Help
