Are there any good choices?
#21
Posted 2006-June-24, 06:37
#22
Posted 2006-June-24, 16:08
whereagles, on Jun 24 2006, 07:13 AM, said:
I agree wholeheartedly that if action is to be taken it should be taken now - my experience on these hands is over the long haul it's best to just shut up and let the opponents struggle trying to go plus - usually any plus our way is OK, but occassionally there is going to be a big swing on these types hands and all you can do is hope your counterpart holding the same tickets does the same thing you do.
I do agree with Phil that in a short swiss match it is probably right to take borderline action as you don't have time to "grind them down", but this hand still to me doesn't fit the ticket for even borderline action - it's all defensive with very little offense unless you get lucky an find a huge fit.
Anyway, that's my thinking for what it is worth.
Winston
#23
Posted 2006-June-24, 17:41
Double is pretty dangerous, as they'll be quick to (redouble and) double at these colors. A good agreement about running will, however, probably be helpful:
If pard bids 2♣, and the opps double:
Running to 2♦ shows equal length (in the reds) or longer diamonds
Redouble shows longer hearts (the more expensive strain)
This scrambling agreement is discussed in the current Bridge World in an MSC write-up (on the auction P 2S P P; X P 3C X; ?).
(I'm not certain why this is the agreement they mention [or how standard it is] instead of xx = equal or longer ♥ and 2♦ = longer diamonds, but in any case, it helps us here.)
Andy
#24
Posted 2006-June-24, 18:15
This seems to be the perfect hand to invoke Hamman's and others rule of saying well bid partner and concentrating on the next hand. I see no reason to blame partner and put her in a bad mood for the rest of the session.
I x...but.......am willing to listen and learn.
#25
Posted 2006-June-25, 10:38
#26
Posted 2006-June-26, 00:53
I would prefer pass as a second choice. But all three bids are fine.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#27
Posted 2006-June-26, 05:18
- hrothgar
#28
Posted 2006-June-26, 07:16
#29
Posted 2006-June-26, 20:23
#30
Posted 2006-June-27, 02:09
#31
Posted 2006-June-27, 12:59
I feel it is usually helpful to just overcall a 5 card major instead of double.
You are not expecting partner bid heart first with 3 hearts, aren't you?
if the emaciated spot cards make you nervous, think about this:
the best way to score spot cards is letting them be trumps.
Usually, it is not the weak suit, but the perspective of having a fit worries me most.
However, any concern of misfit is just far too remote at this point.
#32
Posted 2006-June-27, 23:04
X is 2nd best and very reasonnable as long as you pass 2 or 3 clubs ...or play same level conversion. (or exclusion over take-out X)
2♥ is the kind of bid you make when you play too much matchpoint or you dont get doubled enough. IMHO no expert player will make that call.
1nt deserved major punishment.
if the hand goes
1♠---pass----2♠---pass all around ill have no regrets.
Ben
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#33
Posted 2006-June-27, 23:42
pclayton, on Jun 23 2006, 06:50 PM, said:
I second that.
#34
Posted 2006-July-03, 01:32
bridge blog001:
http://cf71632485.spaces.live.com/blog/cns...!1015.entry
bridge blog002:
http://cvl7163cf2485...st-22291-1.html
"You are not thinking. You are merely being logical". - Neils Bohr
#35
Posted 2006-July-10, 14:21
hrothgar, on Jun 23 2006, 06:07 PM, said:
Red versus White
RHO opens 1♠
You hold
Name your poison
I think if I pass now then I will have to pass after 2♠-p-p. I really don't want to do that, so I will double now and get it off my chest.
-Noble

Help
