The minority and unpopular view was to open a weak 2 or 3 D but we passed, what now and why?
BW deal
#1
Posted 2006-June-14, 13:15
The minority and unpopular view was to open a weak 2 or 3 D but we passed, what now and why?
#2
Posted 2006-June-14, 13:24
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#3
Posted 2006-June-14, 13:25
I must be consistent. If I am such a chicken that I won't open this 2D or 3D, I certainly won't preempt a preempt with it
Double is way too clever for me.
Peter
#4
Posted 2006-June-14, 13:40
#5
Posted 2006-June-14, 13:59
#6
Posted 2006-June-14, 14:03
#7
Posted 2006-June-14, 14:15
2S may have been garpage,
but it could also a min. opener.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8
Posted 2006-June-14, 14:47
If it walks like a chicken and passes like a chicken, it's a chicken
Peter
#9
Posted 2006-June-14, 17:01
#10
Posted 2006-June-14, 17:19
jdonn, on Jun 14 2006, 09:40 PM, said:
I double also because it's MP's.
Less confident however. I would not be surprised if opp made a heavy preempt in 3th hand.
#13
Posted 2006-June-16, 10:27
Action......Votes
3D............8
PASS........9
DOUBLE....7
2NT..........1
Eisenberg: Pass, I am too old to double....
Woolsey, Kokish: Double. Selling out to two spades with a stiff and ...holding half the deck.....if north does not pass the double, that figures to be good.
Rodwell/Wolff: 3D. Double too likely to result in minus 670.
Bramley: 2nt. Too much offense to pass..... shot for two places to play
#14
Posted 2006-June-16, 22:31
#15
Posted 2006-June-16, 23:31
#16
Posted 2006-June-18, 03:29
#17
Posted 2006-June-18, 08:55
jdonn, on Jun 14 2006, 02:40 PM, said:
I see the choices on this hand as being between putting a red card and putting agreen card onthe table.
I am not quite as confident as jdonn seems to be about partner being able to convert the double to penalty, but the bidding makes it sound that way. My concern is that partner might expect a little more from my hand and with less shape if I balance includinga couple of higher honors to help partner get out of his/her hand without potentially giving away a trick (oh, well, i can always convert 3C to 3D as an elcX). My problem with a 3D balance is 1) this hand could very likely be a misfit, and 2) bidding 3D sort of violates the principle of "if I couldn't make this bid before, what makes me think I can bid now at a higher level, especially when the opps haven't demonstrated that they have a fit yet stopped at a low level" (making balancing a more appropriate action to consider.)
Personally, contrary to popular and "expert" opinion, i would have preferred to open this hand 2D. My reasons are three-fold: i have ways to show this hand, it describes my hand in close to one bid (always an objective of mine), and it rates to make life easier on my P in competitive situations. My decision to open or not might have been different had the 4-card major been spades, (there is so much difference between holding hearts vs. spades If my 4-card major). The principle that one should not open a weak 2 bid with an outside 4-card M seems to be too rigid, and I suspect that this contributes to opening 2D being a minority viewpoint. I play relatively disciplined weak 2-bids, but i think the hand should be opened. I like to get in the first shot whenever possible, especially when the action forces the opps to start making decisions at the 2-level.
But, then again, besides being a bidding dinosaur, i play a few very unconventional treatments and creations, and i have to use the approach that seems to work better for meormy partnerships as opposed to what the "book" says. The above is my reasoning, faulty as it might be in the opinion of many.
DHL
#18
Posted 2006-June-18, 09:34
Free, on Jun 18 2006, 04:29 AM, said:
BW Magazine does not publish the whole deal/history of their poll hands.
P=P=2S=P
P=?