Inability to have a relationship
#1
Posted 2009-June-14, 00:23
#2
Posted 2009-June-14, 00:30
#3
Posted 2009-June-14, 00:35
jdonn, on Jun 14 2009, 01:30 AM, said:
I don't drink it makes me wanna jump off a cliff
#4
Posted 2009-June-14, 00:38
I think that in many ways, the Orthodox (jewish) ideas about love can be applied to non-religious relationships. In short, love and attachment form from living together, and mainly from GIVING. The more that you give someone of yourself (speaking emotionally, not materially) the more attached you become to them. This is a very short summary, but it should give you the gist. I'm not capable of giving a more nuanced summary of this, because I don't believe it is the whole and complete truth.
I think that the main point of love is finding someone that you are compatable with, who has similar goals in life, and comes from similar background. And of course, someone who's company you enjoy. The "relationship" part starts off with the "getting to know you part". If that lasts, there's then the ACTUAL relationship, where you love spending time together. You share activities, and MOMENTS, and that's part of what creates the bond between you. You give of your time, and your love, and of yourself and the other person does the same.
This may not sound very sentimental, and I realize that. I was never a romantic person. I never used to have "telationships" that lasted more than a few months at a time, because I never got out of the initial stages. I won't talk about my current relationship.
#5
Posted 2009-June-14, 00:54
You should find out his secret. I suspected at one time that she's made-up, but others assure me that she isn't.
#6
Posted 2009-June-14, 01:08
Most relationships that end teach us things about ourselves, and about what we need in another person. If we take our relationships seriously, each one will help us to be more ready for the right relationship when it shows up. Just because we don't find the right circumstances for a relationship doesn't mean we never will.
There are 2 very important parts to having a successful relationship. One is to choose the right person. Everyone knows that. The other one is more important. Be the right person! If we can do that, then when something does come along, we are ready to benefit from it.
#8
Posted 2009-June-14, 01:19
Where were you while we were getting high?
#9
Posted 2009-June-14, 02:29
Elianna, on Jun 13 2009, 10:38 PM, said:
I more agree with your post than disagree, but I don't think you need similar goals (except what is encompassed in compatible) and I certainly don't think you need a similar background.
I also think there are a lot of wise ideas/advise about relationships that have stuck with me that seem sort of mostly right about something important aspect of things while certainly not being a full picture of everything love and relationships are about.
Quote
is a good example. Others include:
Quote
Or
Quote
Or
Quote
Or
Quote
But I have to say the idea of one soul mate seems pretty silly to me. First of all, the odds of their only being one person out of 6 billion that is right for you seems sub-optimal. Secondly, you can only really choose to be with someone right now. For in the future both you and they will likely be very different.
Also, while what is natural isn't always right, it is pretty clear from evolutionary biology that it isn't natural for people in general to mate faithfully for life.
#11
Posted 2009-June-14, 03:52
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#12
Posted 2009-June-14, 07:02
Quote
I'm sure they share a lot of 'properties' or 'characteristics'. I wouldn't recommend you having a love relationship with your partner or trying to teach/play bridge with your other half. It rarely works.
I'm sure some people are not suitable for longtime relationships. I remember reading about this Dutch law-maker who was trying to get 7-year marriages into the legislature. In the end I think it's about giving and accepting you're with this person for the rest of your life. If you can't do that then it's hard or impossible.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#13
Posted 2009-June-14, 07:21
as for justin's question, i think there are many people incapable of long term relationships, but i think it's a choice (whether subconscious or not) they make... i think it's usually because a person is afraid of losing the best relationship (with him/herself) s/he has ever had
#14
Posted 2009-June-14, 07:39
That said, I sometimes wonder if the reason why it won't work for me is that it is something you have to learn at a young age. Or at least there may be certain aspects of it with which it is advantageous to build up some experience at a young age. Close friendships, flirting, sex, whatever.
I think there have been several wonderful posts in this thread. I especially like Eliiana's post. Also agree with Jimmy that there is a difference between loving someone and being in love with someone.
As for qwery_hi's reference to evolutionary theory: Pinker and Dawkins see romantic love as a way of assuring partner of our fidelity. One obvious objection to that is that fake love would work just as well as real love, and have some obvious advantages. But maybe it is just too difficult to pretend to love someone.
#15
Posted 2009-June-14, 08:19
When two halves meet, they have no choice but to join and form one whole, but have nothing left to give; when two wholes meet, that is beauty, that is love.
Or to put it another way - if you are looking for someone who can make you happy you will always be looking.
#16
Posted 2009-June-14, 09:52
Look at Martel and Stansby, a long term relationship if I ever saw one, enduring beyond marital changes. And I expect it will survive the final double that cost their team a victory in the current USBF championships.
It seems to me that I wasn't really capable of forming long term relationships until I was clear in my own mind about exactly what my own expectations were and what I was willing to put into each relationship to make it successful. So I agree with this:
h2osmom, on Jun 14 2009, 02:08 AM, said:
Knowing what qualities one finds really vital in a long term relationship is also important, and it takes awhile to nail that down. For me, the key personal ingredients are intelligence, irreligion, and a view that life is one great adventure. Unacceptable traits include cloying behaviors, whining, and jealousy. The initial screening process improves the odds that you'll hit it off with a person you date.
When you are ready for a long term relationship yourself, it's also important to be fair to the other person:
matmat, on Jun 14 2009, 02:09 AM, said:
That's a funny way of making the point, but the point is right. If you fool the person you want to be with, you've shot yourself in the foot when the deception comes to light.
So know yourself, know what you want, and be honest:
Elianna, on Jun 14 2009, 01:38 AM, said:
No relationship is perfect, but it doesn't have to be perfect to add wonderful times to one's life!
The infliction of cruelty with a good conscience is a delight to moralists — that is why they invented hell. — Bertrand Russell
#17
Posted 2009-June-14, 12:28
Mbodell, on Jun 14 2009, 12:29 AM, said:
Elianna, on Jun 13 2009, 10:38 PM, said:
I more agree with your post than disagree, but I don't think you need similar goals (except what is encompassed in compatible) and I certainly don't think you need a similar background.
I don't mean career goals; I mean as in number of kids, type of relationship one is searching for, commitment plans, where you would like to live, etc.
By similar background, I mean religion level, education level, etc. This may not be true for everyone, but if I were working for a matching company, the first thing I would look at would be those two categories when I was pairing up people.
#18
Posted 2009-June-14, 13:18
Consider this. Maybe you are like my grandfather and like me in a sense. Maybe for the first 8 years of your adult life your soulmate would have landed you in prison if you had dated her, and maybe for the next 8 years or so you would avoid dating her like the plague, for fear of the jokes.
My grandfather married a woman 8 years his younger after he had settled down and accomplished the growth needed to be ready for her. The same happened for me. She emerged out of nowhere.
Until then, disasters and messes, but fun getting dirty.
So, my advice is to not worry about it and just grab the nasty where you can until the time is right. It may be later.
-P.J. Painter.
#19
Posted 2009-June-14, 13:22
#20
Posted 2009-June-14, 13:51
PassedOut, on Jun 14 2009, 10:52 AM, said:
If you get 3 out of 3 of these, I think you have decent chances. The most sensible thing I ever heard about thinking twice before splitting up came from my favorite cousin's husband who said the problem is all that work you did is down the drain and now you have to break someone else in. And from a former neighbor, who wrote a book with 2 of her pals about their lives: if I knew then what I know now about myself, I think I could have figured out how to make it work. I thought she was going to say she'd have left him earlier! That's probably the most mature thing I've ever heard in my life. He most definitely blew it with that woman.