BBO Discussion Forums: I was tempted to just bid 6 spades here - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

I was tempted to just bid 6 spades here OPINIONS ON THAT THOUGHT PLEASE?

#1 User is offline   sceptic 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,343
  • Joined: 2004-January-03

Posted 2006-June-03, 13:39


Scoring: IMP


West North East South

 -     1♣    2♣    2♦
 4♠    5♣    Pass  Pass
 5♥    Dbl   Pass  Pass
 Pass  

0

#2 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,278
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edinburgh

Posted 2006-June-03, 14:27

You have bid the hand sensibly. Partner will often not be this good so just focus on a reasonable contract.

In terms of contemplating an immediate 6♠, consider a 'typical' reasonable hand for partner:

♠AQxxx
♥AQxxx
♦xx
♣x

Now slam is on a finesse and break. And partner could be weak/worse than this (♥KQJxx for example and slam has no play). So bidding 6♠ is a real gamble.

Bidding a slam requires partner to have a strong Michaels and he would have done something over 5♣ with that.

Paul
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#3 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,725
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2006-June-03, 14:45

cardsharp, on Jun 3 2006, 11:27 PM, said:

You have bid the hand sensibly. Partner will often not be this good so just focus on a reasonable contract.

In terms of contemplating an immediate 6♠, consider a 'typical' reasonable hand for partner:

♠AQxxx
♥AQxxx
♦xx
♣x

Now slam is on a finesse and break. And partner could be weak/worse than this (♥KQJxx for example and slam has no play). So bidding 6♠ is a real gamble.

Bidding a slam requires partner to have a strong Michaels and he would have done something over 5♣ with that.

Paul

Playing good/bad Michaels, this hand is impossible
Alderaan delenda est
0

#4 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-June-03, 15:25

Paul, I think you miss the point of bidding 6♠ -- it will often be a good sacrifice against 6m when it goes down.
I would probably bid 5♠ since there is a good chance 6♣ isn't making (on partner's singleton diamond lead), but I wouldn't criticize 6♠.

Arend
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#5 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,240
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-June-04, 01:55

Hi,

the adv. of bidding 5H / 5S, that you may
buy the hand on the 5 level, which will be
cheaper than buying the hand on the 6
level.

Another point: just hide the dbl fit, simply
repeat your spade suit.

Be certain to make up your mind, how high
you are prepared to go, before you bid 4S.

With kind regards
Marlowe

PS: In the end, you have to get it right, any sensible
strategy can work, the slow approach / the fast
approach.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#6 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2006-June-04, 05:46

I second Arend's comments.


I don't see any reason to introduce hearts. This tells the opponents that we have a double fit, which can only help them. If I just bid 5S directly, I will likely make it. After this auction they might find the ruff.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users