Official Water Cooler Cricket Thread Baseball? Start your own thread...
#241
Posted 2006-December-05, 04:32
I can't believe Jeffrey positively wanted to get up early and watch TV this morning. Sleeping through it all was much more relaxing as well as less depressing.
#242
Posted 2006-December-05, 08:18
Walddk, on Dec 1 2006, 11:11 AM, said:
1. Ashley Giles (Captain)
2. Geraint Jones (1st officer)
3. Ashley Giles
4. Geraint Jones
5. Herman Fletcher (Duncan's cousin from Twit)
6. Ashley Giles
7. Geraint Jones
8. Heather Fletcher (Duncan's niece from Berwick-above-Twerp)
9. Ashley Giles
10. Oliver Fletcher (Duncan's uncle from Nuts)
11. Freddie Flintoff (wicket keeper)
BOSS: DUNCAN FLETCHER
3rd assistant water carrier: Monty Panesar.
Excellent decision, Duncan! You got it your way, and you got the result you deserve. Get out, and let someone who knows something about cricket take over!
The worst part, really, is that after the debacle you even defend your selection of Gilo. "We want to bat to 8". How pathetic. If you don't resign, I hope the ECB has a few sensible people who want to get rid of you sooner rather than later.
I have a feeling that they will get the support of thousands of English cricket fans and the tabloids. It won't be pretty reading tomorrow (Wednesday).
Roland
#243
Posted 2006-December-05, 12:29
the saint, on Dec 4 2006, 09:07 AM, said:
Do I know Cricket...
I'm not happy.
The problem is that with Flintoff's ankle being dodgy, he can't carry a full workload, so we can't play him at 7, a keeper at 8 and have 3 specialist bowlers. Although I think its the only shot we have, but it means that Monty has to play because he can bowl all day. Colly is a bit of a pop-gun especially on these pitches and with the sorry excuse that is the Kookaburra ball. The problem with 4 bowlers is that we don't even look like taking wickets with 5...
Maybe Saj and Monty in for Gilo and Anderson. And even Plunkett for Harmy if he cannot get a wicket. Saj and Plunkett are supposed to be able to hold a bat a bit...
Yes, I'm gutted, but I have to cling to some hope.
#244
Posted 2006-December-05, 16:33
WTF!!!!
Akhtar and Asif decision overturned by PCB!!!!
Sean
#245
Posted 2006-December-05, 18:03
#246
Posted 2006-December-06, 12:58
BTW, who was envious like I was at Adelaide's weather?
#247
Posted 2006-December-08, 22:09
Sean
#248
Posted 2006-December-09, 03:15
#249
Posted 2006-December-14, 05:42
FrancesHinden, on Nov 24 2006, 04:54 PM, said:
...though our batting, as usual, seems to be leaving something to be desired
#250
Posted 2006-December-14, 06:38
FrancesHinden, on Dec 14 2006, 12:42 PM, said:
FrancesHinden, on Nov 24 2006, 04:54 PM, said:
...though our batting, as usual, seems to be leaving something to be desired
Bell was unfortunate to get a good ball straightaway. The hawkeye view of Cook's last three dismissals, showing that he has been out each time to exactly the same ball, is both damning and (hopefully) helpful.
p
#251
Posted 2006-December-14, 07:19
cardsharp, on Dec 14 2006, 02:38 PM, said:
Excuse me, a number 3 batsman was "unfortunate to get a good ball straightaway". Perhaps he should have approached McGrath and asked him:
"Hi mate, could you bowl a few looseners to begin with, please?. I would like to play myself in".
"Sure buddy, take guard".
Out was Bell for a second ball duck. He should surely have had a word with McGrath right away.
"That's no fair, mate. You didn't keep your promise. That ball was too good for me".
Roland
#252
Posted 2006-December-14, 10:35
I believe I suggested earlier in this thread that Saj and Monty for Gilo and Anderson was the way to go. And it seems someone has given Harmy his Christmas present - a new radar - early this year.
#253
Posted 2006-December-14, 13:37
No I mean, sincerely - in your heart of hearts. What was that? Oh yes, I just had a flashback from Day 5 Adelaide.
nickf
sydney
#254
Posted 2006-December-15, 01:43
Still, at least in this test we have some tailenders with a bit of character.
Geoff
#256
Posted 2006-December-15, 18:30
#257
Posted 2006-December-16, 05:00
Not that we are likely to get 556 or whatever it is, but it doesn't exactly help.
#258
Posted 2006-December-16, 07:43

Help
