helene_t, on May 17 2006, 08:40 AM, said:
Actually, if we're talking about a public bridge event, discriminating against obese people is illegal in civilised countries.
I guess this is an interesting question. Is it a "public" bridge event?
Private clubs can discriminate in any way they wish. There are men's clubs, women's clubs, and golfer's clubs, etc. I know of bridge clubs that discriminate on bridge ability for full membership. As long as it's a private club and receives no public funding, I don't see what the problem is. Of course, if the members do not like the rules in the club (and cannot get enough people to go along to change them), then they can "vote with their feet" and choose another club.
Now another question all together is what discrimination should and shouldn't be allowed by the national organisation? I cannot imagine the national organisation would care about a dress code. But if a club discriminated otherwise (age, gender, religion, etc.) then the national organisation should step in and say they cannot be affiliated.
So back to the dress codes. Who cares? If the majority of the members think there should be one, so be it. If enough members think it should be relaxed, bring it forward at the AGM. My personal opinion? I don't really care that they require long pants. I guess having a more relaxed code in the summer might be warranted. However, I certainly would want some dress code (e.g. shoes and a shirt!). It's just a matter to what degree.