BBO Discussion Forums: TWalsh for PC ? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

TWalsh for PC ?

#1 User is offline   Syl20 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 49
  • Joined: 2004-June-19

Posted 2006-May-18, 08:25

Hi all,

Some thoughts I had concerning the ability to use twalsh after the polish 1 opening:

1/ = 7+H, 4+/
1 = 0-6H any
1NT+ = same as usual.

Of course the drawback is the handling of 1 1 beginning:
1NT = 12-14H balanced
2 = 15+H with clubs
other = strong.

I don't think it could be that dangerous when 12-14H opener faces a 0-6H responder since opponents could interfere and let us out of the auction, or double but there is nothing worst than being doubled after a weak nt opening.
In addition, if N°4 doubles and N°2 holds, there are still many ways to survive.

I would be interested by your remarks.

Regards
Sylvain
0

#2 User is offline   david_c 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,178
  • Joined: 2004-November-14
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Mathematics;<br>20th century classical music;<br>Composing.

Posted 2006-May-18, 08:40

One of the things I really like about PC is being able to stop in 1NT when opener has 18-20 balanced opposite a negative. I wouldn't want to give that up.
0

#3 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,516
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-May-18, 08:42

I think your 1-1-1N sequence is really dangerous. In particular if opponents adopt to your methods and pass with a strong hand over 1.

They can always double 1N if they have a good lead, as it will be -180 or -380 at worst, but +300/+500 very well possible.

Arend
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users