what call do you make?
good hand, but....
#2
Posted 2006-May-09, 03:38
Or 3NT if pard is the sort of person who doesn't like cuebids.
#3
Posted 2006-May-09, 03:58
#4
Posted 2006-May-09, 04:12
In this case 2H, assuming this
shows a 6 carder.
Partner will make a move most of
the time we will have game, so
you wont miss game often.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#5
Posted 2006-May-09, 04:30
Quote
You're joking? I don't know anyone that plays 1NT as forcing in this sequence.
Quote
shows a 6 carder.
Partner will make a move most of
the time we will have game, so
you wont miss game often.
2♥ shows a desire to play in 2♥ and partner will move precisely 0% of the time over it.
#6
Posted 2006-May-09, 10:23
I think 2N is sensible; its a value bid and we might be able to back into a 6-2 ♥ fit.
3♥ and 2♠ just don't feel right.
#7
Posted 2006-May-09, 10:30
#8
Posted 2006-May-09, 12:58
#9
Posted 2006-May-09, 13:39
I bid 3♠ here to show I want him to choose between 3NT and 4♥ and I have no help in spades.
3♥ would show better hearts and can be passed
2NT would be probably with some help in spades (not sure)
2♠ seems to ask for a minor
Who knows, maybe 3♠ carries the right message.
Luis
#10
Posted 2006-May-10, 00:13
With 17 HCPs, a 6 card suit opps. a 8-10 hand, I am just too fat to play 1 or 2 NT.
Partscores with about 26 HCPS and length are not often a winning descission.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#11
Posted 2006-May-10, 01:35
luis, on May 9 2006, 07:39 PM, said:
I bid 3♠ here to show I want him to choose between 3NT and 4♥ and I have no help in spades.
3♥ would show better hearts and can be passed
2NT would be probably with some help in spades (not sure)
2♠ seems to ask for a minor
Who knows, maybe 3♠ carries the right message.
I think it's too risky to bid 3♠ here. Being an undiscussed bid, pard may take it for a strong 0544 or maybe 6 solid hearts, good hand and no stopper. There is no guarantee pard is going to interpret 3♠ as 6 weakish hearts and nothing in spades.
Incidently, I believe there's a case for 3♥ to be forcing. 1NT isn't your usual 5-10, possibly unbalanced. It's about 8-10, usually balanced and with a stop. You can always lower the requirements for 3♥ to a min hand and good suit, though. (With a 1-suited med hand of 15-17 you just force to game.)
#12
Posted 2006-May-10, 08:06
matmat, on May 9 2006, 03:18 AM, said:
N......E......S......W
........P......1♥......1♠
1NT..P......?
what call do you make?
Playing Standard, 1H-(1S)-1N shows ~8-9 HCP Responder w/ S's stopped.
we have 17 HCP and a 6 H's. We therefore belong in 3N or 4H.
Make whatever bid(s) will get Us there.
3S! is a nice but potentially too sophisticated choice. A good Responder will think along these lines after 1H-(1S)-1N-pa;3S!
"OK, that was a GF cue bid. GOP already heard me say I have S's stopped, so why is he asking me if S's are stopped? Because he needs a way to tell me he has 6th H in a GF hand."
2S! should also work:
...2S!-pa-2H...4H or
...2S!-pa-foo..2H => GF hand w/ 6+H
The upside is 2S! is less likely to be misunderstood. The downside is an extra round of bidding often tells the opponents how to defend more accurately.
Given your soft H's and stoppers in the short suits, 3N may play better then 4H even if We do have a 62 H fit, so just bidding 3N is not irrational either. If GOP has hidden 3card support, they should routinely bid 4H.
#13
Posted 2006-May-11, 23:37
foo, on May 10 2006, 09:06 AM, said:
I'll bid 3♥...then3NT or 4♥
http://cf71632485.spaces.live.com/blog/cns...!1015.entry
bridge blog002:
http://cvl7163cf2485...st-22291-1.html
#14
Posted 2006-May-12, 00:08
civill, on May 12 2006, 12:37 AM, said:
foo, on May 10 2006, 09:06 AM, said:
I'll bid 3♥...then3NT or 4♥
Assuming that there are no typos in your post...
...you do know that Responder can pass 1H-(1S)-1N;3H-??
1H-(1S)-1N;3H is Invitational opposite an ~8-9 point Responder.
Meaning ~16 points.
Since with your ~19 point "foot" you never want Responder to pass below game, you have to make a rebid that is GF or find a sequence that is GF.
K9xxxx is just not a good enough trump suit to leap to 4M with.
Just rebidding 3N is awefully unilateral.
Cue-bids are 100% forcing and make it easy to establish a GF.
#15
Posted 2006-May-12, 19:03

Help

N......E......S......W
........P......1♥......1♠
1NT..P......?