BBO Discussion Forums: Hand from our IMP league match (II) - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Hand from our IMP league match (II)

Poll: Your rebid (playing Precision) (14 member(s) have cast votes)

Your rebid (playing Precision)

  1. Pass (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 2 Hearts (8 votes [57.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 57.14%

  3. 3 Clubs (1 votes [7.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.14%

  4. 3 Hearts (undiscussed) (5 votes [35.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.71%

  5. Other (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2006-May-05, 10:42

You are playing Precision with your ex-pard and look at (red on red): ♠void ♥KQT8xx ♦xx ♣K6xxx

Pard opens 1♠ and you try 1N (agree? by the way, we don't play 2/1 as GF). Pard tries 2♣ which promises 2+.

Now what?
"Phil" on BBO
0

#2 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2006-May-05, 11:10

Hard to believe 3♥ is undiscussed..but simple things first. Do I agree with 1NT over 1♠? The answer is no. Being vulnerable I am taking the high road and bidding 2♥ with this hand. This is a very good hand.

Having bid 1NT, I am not bidding 2♥, too huge an underbid. I am not passing, as I have game ambition, not 3♣ as that will not get the job done, so I guess here I have to bid 3♥. Better, to start 2♥ imho.
--Ben--

#3 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2006-May-05, 17:38

2♥ for me
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#4 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2006-May-06, 17:33

Since this is precision, the chances of a game are more remote, so I don't feel the need to bid 2♥ over 1♠. Thus 1NT seems fair.

Now I'll bid 4♣.
0

#5 User is offline   1eyedjack 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,575
  • Joined: 2004-March-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2006-May-06, 18:30

Having a bit of trouble with the system here. If 2/1 is NOT GF, on what hands may opener rebid 2C on as few as doubleton, and what is the rationale?

That said, I think that there is no possible meaning for 3H other than a big H-C 2-suiter in context.
Psych (pron. saik): A gross and deliberate misstatement of honour strength and/or suit length. Expressly permitted under Law 73E but forbidden contrary to that law by Acol club tourneys.

Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. mPosted ImagesPosted ImagetPosted Imager-mPosted ImagendPosted Imageing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.

"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"

"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
0

#6 User is offline   nickf 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 774
  • Joined: 2003-June-07
  • Location:Chatswood, Sydney

Posted 2006-May-06, 18:59

I think opposite a limited opening, 3C is enough.

pclayton, on May 6 2006, 02:42 AM, said:

You are playing Precision with your ex-pard.

However, I'm curious though - did this person become your ex-partner before or after this match?

nickf
sydney
.

#7 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2006-May-07, 11:03

We stopped playing about 2 years ago. It wasn't my intention to play with him on this team, but one of the members wouldn't make himself available, so we had to juggle the partnerships a little.

I bid 2♥ as well and pard passed with: ♠AQ9xx ♥Jx ♦KT9 ♣Axx. At the time, I thought he should have opened a 14-16 1N.

At the other table, his hand (John Swanson) opened 1N playing a 15-17 NT! David Weiss Texas'd with mine. Chris can beat the game with a trump lead and a diamond through, but led the ♣Q. I think game is excellent from his side, but only fair from mine.

I'm not sure what my LHO will lead against 4♥, but against 2 I got the ♣10 so I made an easy 10 tricks.

I think in our old system notes we had 3♥ defined as a splinter for clubs, so I didn't want to risk it. I'm not sure he's going to game anyway, although the scoring dictates he should.
"Phil" on BBO
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users