BBO Discussion Forums: Frustrating Match - Hand IV - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Frustrating Match - Hand IV Last hunt for 5+ IMPs

Poll: What's your action? (22 member(s) have cast votes)

What's your action?

  1. 4C (8 votes [36.36%])

    Percentage of vote: 36.36%

  2. Pass, lead a trump (12 votes [54.55%])

    Percentage of vote: 54.55%

  3. Pass, lead a heart (2 votes [9.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

  4. Pass, lead a diamond (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. Pass, lead a club (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. Other (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   sfbp 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 249
  • Joined: 2003-March-14
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-May-03, 09:58

I don't play (or play against) the multi - so i have never had to reason this type of sequence before. Thanks for the problem!

Could partner have 5 hearts? It seems to me that his second double tends to confirm that he doesn't. What do I know?

In that case if spades are 4-1 we are toast in 3 spades - but I don't think so.

I place the ♥K on the table before I change my mind. Then I pick up the bidding cards.

Stephen
Stephen Pickett
co-founder HomeBase Club, author of BRidgeBRowser
0

#22 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2006-May-03, 15:18

I think there's a good chance that spades are 6331. Pass might work but I hate passing because I don't have an attractive alternative. So Ill content myself with 4C.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#23 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2006-May-04, 06:14

At the table I bid 4♣ with no confidence in it being right. Passing would have been way more successful - it doesn't matter what you lead as long as it isn't a diamond. At the time, I missed the inference about partner's likely heaviness in high cards from the auction (aren't you lucky you get it spelled out in the problem posting?) as I spent the first few minutes working out what double-then-double actually meant in our methods!


Partner has
A
AQx
J9xx
AQJxx

and you get +500 from passing; +130 or -50 from bidding (nobody tried 3NT, which makes).
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users