Opps are playing penalty doubles of preempts How does it change your strategy?
#1
Posted 2006-April-18, 08:13
#2
Posted 2006-April-18, 08:19
3any-P-P-DBL * TAKEOUT
P - PAss <--- penalty pass
If anything I might preempt a little more, because they lack the weapons to compete effectively without a takeout double handy. I guess the five card and very weak 6 card preempts might, however, be a little less likely.
#4
Posted 2006-April-18, 08:26
I used to play a scheme through 3♣ called Weiss where an immediate double of a natural preempt was pen-oriented. It was rather interesting.
#5
Posted 2006-April-18, 09:30
#6
Posted 2006-April-18, 09:54
#7
Posted 2006-April-18, 10:34
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
#8
Posted 2006-April-18, 10:42
zasanya, on Apr 18 2006, 04:34 PM, said:
Funny that when Fishbein was played, a preempt had to have KQJT or thereabouts. Now that doubles are for take-out, people open on jack-high suits.. LOL.
#9
Posted 2006-April-18, 11:16
MickyB, on Apr 18 2006, 05:13 PM, said:
Silly me... I always thought that player's weren't supposed to alter their preemptive style/methods based on the opponents defenses. In fact, I can recall at least one appeal from a North American Nationals where the player argued that his opponents passed a hand that they would have otherwise preempted with based on the fact that he was playing penalty oriented methods.
#10
Posted 2006-April-18, 11:20
hrothgar, on Apr 18 2006, 12:16 PM, said:
Seriously? I would love to see that appeal. I believe you that it exists, but I really want to read it. This rule sounds like fiction to me, you can preempt or not on any hand you feel like any time you feel like, for whatever reasons you feel like.
What if the opponents had the agreement that if I preempt, they must double me and pass it out there? You had better believe I would open 3♦ with nine solid diamonds.
#11
Posted 2006-April-18, 12:50
jdonn, on Apr 18 2006, 06:20 PM, said:
hrothgar, on Apr 18 2006, 12:16 PM, said:
Seriously? I would love to see that appeal. I believe you that it exists, but I really want to read it. This rule sounds like fiction to me, you can preempt or not on any hand you feel like any time you feel like, for whatever reasons you feel like.
What if the opponents had the agreement that if I preempt, they must double me and pass it out there? You had better believe I would open 3♦ with nine solid diamonds.
If you pass a preempt hand, you can always consider it a psych...
#12
Posted 2006-April-18, 13:02
jdonn, on Apr 18 2006, 08:20 PM, said:
What if the opponents had the agreement that if I preempt, they must double me and pass it out there? You had better believe I would open 3♦ with nine solid diamonds.
Here's the thread... (Ain't Google a grand thing)
Only reason that I remembered this is that it involved Bo-Yin Yang who used to be a fixture at the MIT bridge club
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.b...c4b0890cd98e3d7
#13
Posted 2006-April-18, 13:10
hrothgar, on Apr 18 2006, 07:02 PM, said:
jdonn, on Apr 18 2006, 08:20 PM, said:
What if the opponents had the agreement that if I preempt, they must double me and pass it out there? You had better believe I would open 3♦ with nine solid diamonds.
Here's the thread... (Ain't Google a grand thing)
Only reason that I remembered this is that it involved Bo-Yin Yang who used to be a fixture at the MIT bridge club
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.b...c4b0890cd98e3d7
Very interesting.
I think that the problem was that if you change your style based on your opponents methods then you have to announce it.
But then if you announce you change your style they can change their methods and that never ends? Is there a solution?
A: We preempt wild
B: Then we play penalty doubles
A: Oh then we preempt solid
B: Then double is takeout
Repeat
#14
Posted 2006-April-18, 13:24
The pair that calls first have to decide their methods first.
#15
Posted 2006-April-18, 14:05
#16
Posted 2006-April-18, 18:40
#17
Posted 2006-April-18, 23:10
whereagles, on Apr 18 2006, 11:42 AM, said:
zasanya, on Apr 18 2006, 04:34 PM, said:
Funny that when Fishbein was played, a preempt had to have KQJT or thereabouts. Now that doubles are for take-out, people open on jack-high suits.. LOL.
Thats why I think double for penalty has merit.IMO it is the Jack top preempt which is difficult to handle and leads to unusual result.
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
#18
Posted 2006-April-19, 02:42
- Vulnerable we use decent preempts so no real problem there
- NV vs NV is a little agressive, I might make them more solid, just in case
- NV vs V, we play garbage preempts: 0-7hcp with 5+ card suit (basicly it's like 3-level lorenzo's ) The whole point of this opening style is that opponents won't penalize you anyway, because they have soooo much more to score. So I'd still get in agressively. They may have slam, and I can go -6. We usually find some kind of fit, which gives us the few tricks we need.
#19
Posted 2006-April-19, 06:16
I smell fear!! LUNCHTIME!
On a similar note, I know a pair who play Lebensohl even though they continually mess it up. So I open a Weak Two on an excuse and a following wind against them.
I figured that 4♥ was a fair distance away, my side cards would take off the opponents' contract and that they wouldn't be able to compete effectively over a 3♥ opening without a penalty double available, so that was what I bid. As it happened, both 4♥ and 5♣ were making (partner has 2 aces, 3 hearts and a stiff club)