BBO Discussion Forums: Variation to BWDH - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Variation to BWDH

#21 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2006-April-11, 14:49

Good point Phil. Fortunately they didn't lead a trump. Also, as Jdonn already stated, my response was questionable and the result can be blamed on my choice at least as much as on MickyB's.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#22 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,794
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-April-11, 15:00

I agree 100% with all the bids, this hand is more difficult than most seem to consider but with all that said I thought all the bids were clear cut.
0

#23 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2006-April-11, 15:10

mike777, on Apr 11 2006, 04:00 PM, said:

I agree 100% with all the bids, this hand is more difficult than most seem to consider but with all that said I thought all the bids were clear cut.

Now here is a man who does not result! :)
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#24 User is offline   HeartA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,016
  • Joined: 2004-October-17

Posted 2006-April-11, 15:34

Hannie, on Apr 10 2006, 04:27 PM, said:

Wow Josh, 3♦!?!

3♦ would be my choice, too. wtp?
Senshu
0

#25 User is offline   mikestar 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 913
  • Joined: 2003-August-18
  • Location:California, USA

Posted 2006-April-12, 10:50

This is the sort of hand where you curse yourself for not playing Precision--of course, we Precisionistas curse ourselves for playing it on on certain other hand types. If perfect methods were possible, they would have been discovered by now.
0

#26 User is offline   civill 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 189
  • Joined: 2004-December-06
  • Location:China

Posted 2006-April-13, 23:25

It's too early to support ♠,so I'll bid 2♦ for NT contract or 3♥ for 17HCPs and 6-card suit.
bridge blog001:
http://cf71632485.spaces.live.com/blog/cns...!1015.entry

bridge blog002:
http://cvl7163cf2485...st-22291-1.html
0

#27 User is offline   000002 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 337
  • Joined: 2005-August-02

Posted 2006-April-14, 06:00

To show the whole !


i learned to hate whichever 2♦ or 2♥,
i like 3♥ if it's natural bidding,
i accept 3♠ with a little reluctant,
i vote the artifactual 2nt .
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users