BBO Discussion Forums: Percentages? No way! - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Percentages? No way!

#1 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2003-December-13, 06:59

A hand I played last night in my local club. I play 6C and I get a club lead:

AQ9863
86
K4
962

-
AQ1075
AQ7
AKQJ10

So I start playing the percentage play: goal is to discard a heart on DQ, ruff 2 hearts and discard another heart (in my hand this time) on SA, losing only 1 heart unless they are 3-3 divided when I'd make +1.
I play DK, DA and DQ and east ruffs! Change of plan... I overruff, and go for the Heart finesse. Hearts now have to be 3-3 and the King in front, or maybe 4-2 with the jack falling. Bam! HK in east and another club. I had to lose only 1 heart anymore, because they were 3-3 divided... I went one down. Even if I didn't overruff, I went down, because east had another trump.

There was a winning play: start directly with HA and a small heart, because I have to ruff only one (3-3 divided) heart and then I have 12 tricks.

This hand is a typical example of the fact that percentages are not always right!

Would you have played my way, or the winning way?

Free
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#2 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2003-December-13, 08:26

i think (at 6C) i'd lead HA, diamond to king, toss a heart on SA, low heart toward HQ/10, covering whatever east played (if i can).. sometimes east gets antsy and plays the HK if he holds it, sometimes west has K doubleton, but always i avoid a guess..

i have no idea if the percentages favor this or some other play
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#3 User is offline   Trpltrbl 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,230
  • Joined: 2003-December-17
  • Location:Ohio
  • Interests:Sailing, cooking, bonsaitrees.

Posted 2003-December-26, 16:58

Quote

A hand I played last night in my local club. I play 6C and I get a club lead:

AQ9863
86
K4
962

-
AQ1075
AQ7
AKQJ10

So I start playing the percentage play: goal is to discard a heart on DQ, ruff 2 hearts and discard another heart (in my hand this time) on SA, losing only 1 heart unless they are 3-3 divided when I'd make +1.
I play DK, DA and DQ and east ruffs! Change of plan... I overruff, and go for the Heart finesse. Hearts now have to be 3-3 and the King in front, or maybe 4-2 with the jack falling. Bam! HK in east and another club. I had to lose only 1 heart anymore, because they were 3-3 divided... I went one down. Even if I didn't overruff, I went down, because east had another trump.

There was a winning play: start directly with HA and a small heart, because I have to ruff only one (3-3 divided) heart and then I have 12 tricks.

This hand is a typical example of the fact that percentages are not always right!

Would you have played my way, or the winning way?

Free

Unless there is a 100% play there is always a change that r percentage play isn't working :)
That's why it is called % play hehehe But I would have played Heart Ace and go to dummy with the Di K and play a heart up. Maybe not best % play but that's what my feeling tells me to do. I have gone down before and I am sure I will go down again hehehe.

Mike ;D
“If there is dissatisfaction with the status quo, good. If there is ferment,
so much the better. If there is restlessness, I am pleased. Then let there
be ideas, and hard thought, and hard work.”
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users