Multi Wilkosz New convention?
#1
Posted 2006-March-11, 16:05
a. balanced hand with 17-18 points (could also be 18-19 or 19-20, whatever fits best into your system)
b. weak 5-5 two-suiter, major+other
It seems to work, the responses are
pass = weak, (4)5+♣
2♦ = all hands that does not fit into other bids. Opener bids cheaper major with a 5-5 and 2NT with a balanced hand. Opener may user higher bids to show 6-5 or better, 2♦ usually includes some strength (about 7-14)
2♥/♠ = to play, against both handtypes
2NT = asking, GF, normal Wilkosz responses (3NT free for balanced alternative)
3♣ = invitational three-suiter, short spades
higher = as in Wilkosz, not sure if one should use 4-level bids.
2♣-2♦-2♥-?
2♠ = pass or correct
higher = natural, should probably be invitationally oriented. Could probably develop some paradox-like stuff.
2♣-2♦-2[NT]-?
3♣ = Stayman
3♦ = to play, all other rebids are natural GF
It has a lot common with standard multi, so maybe multi-Wilkosz could be allowed where multi is allowed?
It could be used even in a natural system, all you need is to use 2♦ as strong.
#2
Posted 2006-March-11, 17:11
Would prefer to restrict the weak hand types, so that 2♣ shows 18-19 bal or two suiter with ♠s and another suit. Then:
Pass: to play
2♦ transfer to ♥s - 2♠ now shows ♠s and a minor
2♥ transfers to ♠s - 2♠ or 2NT shows bal, 3X shows two suiter
2♠ pass or correct - pass with two suiter, bid 2NT if bal and now system on
2NT strong ask
3♣ pass or correct with two suiter, bid 3NT if bal without 4/5♥s, 3♠ if bal and 4/5♥s
3♦ with long suit, to play
etc.
#3
Posted 2006-March-11, 17:51
weak 2♦ opening OR
5+ Spades and 4+ Hearts (weak) OR
23-24 HCP balanced
#5
Posted 2006-March-12, 02:18
hrothgar, on Mar 12 2006, 12:51 AM, said:
weak 2♦ opening OR
5+ Spades and 4+ Hearts (weak) OR
23-24 HCP balanced
I've played that for a while, but it's brown sticker, not allowed for 'sure'...
Dunno what you'd like to play with 2M, but if you really want to play all 2-suiters with strong options included, following is played a lot around here:
2♣ = weak with both Majors (44+, 54+, 55+, whatever you like in current vulnerability) OR semi GF OR NT 22-23
2♦ = weak with 1 Major OR GF any suit OR NT 24+
2M = weak with 5M and 4+m (Muiderberg), which is usually 55+ when V
2NT = 20-21
It works ok, but strong 3-suiters are still a problem. You obviously don't have the control like other strong openings, but they seldom come up and you have a pretty frequent 2-level opening structure.
#6
Posted 2006-March-12, 04:33
Free, on Mar 12 2006, 03:18 AM, said:
hrothgar, on Mar 12 2006, 12:51 AM, said:
weak 2♦ opening OR
5+ Spades and 4+ Hearts (weak) OR
23-24 HCP balanced
I've played that for a while, but it's brown sticker, not allowed for 'sure'...
Interesting, it's allowed in the EBU (so long as your strength for both the weak options is about the same) as all of the weak options deny the suit opened.
#7
Posted 2006-March-12, 17:41
Free, on Mar 12 2006, 09:18 AM, said:
It works ok, but strong 3-suiters are still a problem. You obviously don't have the control like other strong openings, but they seldom come up and you have a pretty frequent 2-level opening structure.
Why not include the strong 3-suiters into the multi as well? Did I miss something here?
--Sigi
#8
Posted 2006-March-12, 17:48
#9
Posted 2006-March-12, 20:47
http://cf71632485.spaces.live.com/blog/cns...!1015.entry
bridge blog002:
http://cvl7163cf2485...st-22291-1.html
#10
Posted 2006-March-13, 03:16
#11
Posted 2006-March-13, 10:31
DrTodd13, on Mar 13 2006, 12:48 AM, said:
:-)
Having a strong-three suiter in the Multi is a very common, if not standard, treatment (at least in my club, if not in most of Germany, if not in most of Europe).
--Sigi
#12
Posted 2006-March-14, 05:37
Quote
I've seen it before but it seems far from standard. For me a "standard" Multi shows either:
♣ (strong)
♦ (strong)
♥ (weak)
♠ (weak)
or
NT (strong)
#13
Posted 2006-March-19, 08:06
Gerben42, on Mar 14 2006, 06:37 AM, said:
Quote
I've seen it before but it seems far from standard. For me a "standard" Multi shows either:
♣ (strong)
♦ (strong)
♥ (weak)
♠ (weak)
or
NT (strong)
Well, Gerben, the difference with your "standard Multi" is very small:
This one shows either:
♣ (strong) -> OUT
♦ (strong) -> OUT
♥ (weak) (+ side suit)
♠ (weak) (+ side suit)
or
NT (strong)
I think it shouldn't be a problem at all (but I know it is a problem since the people in power have ruled Wilkosz as Brown Sticker and Multi as an exception).
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg

Help
