Page 1 of 1
Life after preempt
#1
Posted 2006-March-10, 05:05
Matchpoints, intermediate field, system: 2/1, you hold:
♠ J5
♥ QJ3
♦ JT5
♣ QT932
All vuln
RHO you LHO pard
3♦ . pass pass dbl
pass ??
Your bid?
♠ J5
♥ QJ3
♦ JT5
♣ QT932
All vuln
RHO you LHO pard
3♦ . pass pass dbl
pass ??
Your bid?
#2
Posted 2006-March-10, 05:16
4C, wtp?
Do I have a 4 card mayor? No
Do I have the power and trump length to pass? No
Do I have the power and stopper to bid 3NT? No
What is left?
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: Of course, I could try to be clever and Pass hoping
for 200, but since I am better than the field (am I?), I
will try to go plus, and try to win on a other board.
Do I have a 4 card mayor? No
Do I have the power and trump length to pass? No
Do I have the power and stopper to bid 3NT? No
What is left?
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: Of course, I could try to be clever and Pass hoping
for 200, but since I am better than the field (am I?), I
will try to go plus, and try to win on a other board.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#3
Posted 2006-March-10, 05:31
P_Marlowe, on Mar 10 2006, 12:16 PM, said:
Do I have a 4 card mayor? No
Do I have the power and trump length to pass? No
Do I have the power and stopper to bid 3NT? No
Do I have the power and trump length to pass? No
Do I have the power and stopper to bid 3NT? No
4C, wtp?
Alain
#5
Posted 2006-March-10, 07:34
4♣. Double is for take-out, is it not? So I take it out in my longest suit. Maybe partner is 4522 or 5422 and preferred a double to 3MA, but I can't know, so anything but 4♣ would be master-minding, pass included.
Since this is presented as a problem, there must be more to it than this. Did partner tank before he doubled? If he did, I'm not in a better position, because I am not allowed to take advantage of the UI.
Roland
Since this is presented as a problem, there must be more to it than this. Did partner tank before he doubled? If he did, I'm not in a better position, because I am not allowed to take advantage of the UI.
Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
#6
Posted 2006-March-10, 07:46
Hmm. Longest suit at the lowest level clearly isn't the correct call here because it's presented as a problem. But it's what I'd bid.
#9
Posted 2006-March-10, 09:13
4♣ is clear, but I'm sure we can come up with hands where 3NT wins the day.
For example if partner has:
♠Qxxx
♥AKxx
♦Q
♣AKxx
But it is a pretty contrived example and I'm not going to try be a hero on this hand.
For example if partner has:
♠Qxxx
♥AKxx
♦Q
♣AKxx
But it is a pretty contrived example and I'm not going to try be a hero on this hand.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
#10
Posted 2006-March-10, 10:24
I agree with Gerber. My problem will come on the next round: is this hand really strong enough to ask for kings (via 5♣)?
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#11
Posted 2006-March-10, 12:04
Thx all. 4♣ is best, yes. Pard held:
♠ AKxx
♥ KTx
♦ --
♣ AKTxxx
You'll get to 5 or 6♣ now. As long as you don't "try" for something like pass or 3♥, all is well.
♠ AKxx
♥ KTx
♦ --
♣ AKTxxx
You'll get to 5 or 6♣ now. As long as you don't "try" for something like pass or 3♥, all is well.
Page 1 of 1

Help
