BBO Discussion Forums: PC: Transferbids after 1Club opening - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

PC: Transferbids after 1Club opening transferbids in polish club?!

#1 User is offline   extrasolid 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: 2004-April-23
  • Location:Neuruppin in Germany (70km NW of Berlin)

  Posted 2006-February-24, 08:45

Hello,

we play an interesting polish-club-system with some nice features (eg GF-raises in the majors with a following relaissystem, 2 weak, at least 4-4 in the majors). If anybody is interested he can write to extrasolid@gmx.net :D

Our last improvement is an exchange of the meaning of 1/. 1 shows 4+spades, 4 hearts are still possible. Then 1 from responder shows 4+hearts, no -fit. After 1 - 1* - 1NT - 2 (magister) opener shows threecardsupport for hearts or 4spades with 2. Now 2NT has to be sign-off :D . Otherwise you could not search for a better partgame than 1NT.

Has anybody an idea how the exchange of the meanings could work better? The problem is not to miss a game with 45??

Ulrich
0

#2 User is offline   DJNeill 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 455
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hillsboro, OR USA
  • Interests:current events, long-distance cycling

Posted 2006-February-24, 09:07

Hi Ulrich,
Play an enhanced 2-way checkback a la WJXXI. I am sure you can figure out a way to encode what you want in that structure somewhere.
link

Thanks,
Dan
0

#3 User is offline   extrasolid 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: 2004-April-23
  • Location:Neuruppin in Germany (70km NW of Berlin)

Posted 2006-February-24, 09:34

:D Nice link; its not too easy when you do not understand one word of the polish language!

The 2-way-checkback is not really a solution, because you cant find your 4-4 Spade-fit cheaply; after 1 1* 1NT 2* 2* you can bid 2 to play. But you can not find the 4-4-fit in Spades which anybody finds after 1 1 1 2 PPP!

Ulrich
0

#4 User is offline   glen 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,637
  • Joined: 2003-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, Canada
  • Interests:Military history, WW II wargames

Posted 2006-February-24, 10:22

Play two-way NMF, so that:

2 forces 2, and after opener bids this, responder passes with signoff or bids with any game invite, or bids 3NT to offer choice of game with 5s

2 is either:
1) Any Game Force
2) A signoff with 5+s and 4s

Opener assumes 2) at first and bids 2 or 2 - then responder passes with 2) and bids again with 1) - the cheapest bid asks opener to continue to describe hand.

So, for example,
1-1(showing s)--1NT-2--2(prefers s)-2 establishes a game force, says nothing about s, and asks for a futher description.
'I hit my peak at seven' Taylor Swift
0

#5 User is offline   extrasolid 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: 2004-April-23
  • Location:Neuruppin in Germany (70km NW of Berlin)

Posted 2006-February-24, 10:39

:D Nice one; NOW i understand; thinking slow but at last...

I have suggested it to my P!

Ulrich
0

#6 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2006-February-24, 12:13

I think Transfer Checkback has 2 as 54 NF. 2 is a puppet to 2, as in Two-Way Checkback, and 2 is a transfer to hearts.
0

#7 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2006-February-27, 05:40

In my system I have included these "reverse major" bids also.

Basically, to deal with 5 4 hands is a problem, I use 1 2 = 5 4 NF.

Basically you are in the same boat as everyone who plays that 1 1 1NT does not deny 4 and showing a balanced hand first is more important. 1- or 2-way Checkback of some sort is the solution.

1 2 shows both minors, invitational.

This solves the problem that you have no bid after 1 1 1 (after 1 rebid from opener WJ uses 2 as the strong minor-oriented hand. No such bid is available if partner bids , however).

Now another advantage is that you can use 1 1 1 2 as a 6-card suit, 1 denying the very weak jump shift (i.e. 4/5)
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#8 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2006-February-27, 05:50

I used to play these inverted Majors. What we did was following:
- With weak hands, just start showing first (1 bid) even with longer . Partner shows a 4 card by bidding 1 or something else. When responder now rebids 2, he has a weak hand with 5+ and 4. With 5 and 4, start the same, but rebid 2 (since partner doesn't have 4 anyway).
- With inv+ hands, show your longest Major first, and use full checkback (3-level responses also show the hand with maximum) to find out what you want.

This worked out great a lot of times! Biddings like 1-1-1NT-2 were no problem for us, but for other systems they were. Other hands didn't have much problems as well.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#9 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2006-February-27, 22:09

Free, on Feb 27 2006, 06:50 AM, said:

This worked out great a lot of times! Biddings like 1-1-1NT-2 were no problem for us, but for other systems they were. Other hands didn't have much problems as well.

that shows 5 hearts and 4 spades? why not just open flannery :D
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#10 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2006-February-28, 03:07

<whacks Luke> Partner opened, and... NEVER!
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#11 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2006-March-01, 00:41

An interesting way to reply to 1c is



1d = waiting denies 5M unbalanced

1h = 5s

-------1s-----1nt--S+ diam
---------------2c -- H
---------------2d-- 6s
---------------2h--S+C



1S = H+ C
1nt = H+ D
2c = 6H
2d = H+ S 0-8 or GF
2h = 5H + 4s 9-11 inv
2s + 5h + 4s GF 12 +


our 1c opening is 12-19 bal or 15-17 any shapes.


all Bids are 0 +
inv bids are 7-8



Its allow to GF early without playing positive or negative responses.

And its alos permit you to relay whatever you pts range wich is the key to a successfull relay bidding system IMHO.


Drawback is

you cannot stop in 2c unless opener is 15-17 with clubs.
you cant stop in 1nt if opener or responder have a 5M unbalanced.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users