[pclayton]

While I appreciate this work of the volunteers, I am concerned that the level of some of the subject matter is more focused on the beginner and int (-) instead of the Int (+) / Adv.

[hrothgar]

I was vaguely considering working on a lecture, however, I wanted to check whether the topic would be of general interest:

The lecture would focus on the use of simple inversions to make more effective use of bidding space. For example: Assume that a partnership has agreed to use the auction

2♥ - 2N

to ask for shortness. Following a 2♥ opening, the partnership might consider inverting the 2♠ and 2N responses. (2♠ asks for shortness and 2NT would show a forcing hand with Spades). In a similar fashion, any people chose to use the auction 1♥ - 2♠ as their Jacoby NT try raise. There are a number of other examples of varying complexity... The Kaplan inversion is potentially the most complex sub-topic.

[jillybean]

Please post any comments, suggestion, and questions here and not to the ‘i-abc lesson thread’
That thread is being used for lesson information only and is used to notify people of upcoming lessons, each post generates an email.

Thanks

[jillybean]

pclayton, on Jan 19 2006, 04:10 PM, said:

While I appreciate this work of the volunteers, I am concerned that the level of some of the subject matter is more focused on the beginner and int (-) instead of the Int (+) / Adv.

I don’t have the experience to really gauge if the lessons are suitable for beginners, intermediate or advanced but I do trust the people who are giving lessons and that they will use material appropriate for the audience. I do think we are offering something that is not otherwise available to BBO members.

As more people offer to run sessions maybe we will see advanced+ lessons, Richards suggestion seems more suitable for advanced players.

The feedback we have been getting is very positive, if there are other topics of interest please tell us and similarly, if you are willing to host a session.

thanks.
jb

[zasanya]

I am intermediate-advanced player.The topic I would like to learn about are
(1) Competitive auctions.(I know about the Law of Total Tricks.)
(2) Overcalls and subsequent action by advancer.
(3) Handling preempts especially 4 level preempts.
(4)The action after responder of a weak 2 opener psyches in your suit.
I would like to attend the session but will be satisfied with lecture notes.The reason I may not be able to attend is that the sessions are generally held at time unsuitable to players from India.

[Chamaco]

zasanya, on Jan 20 2006, 09:19 AM, said:

(3) Handling preempts especially 4 level preempts.

From the point of view of bidding, this one gets my vote big time, together with any topic about handling 5 and 6-level decisions, both from the hand evaluation viewpoint as well as specific gadgets/agreement:
how to make a slam try, how to show/deny 1st control in opp suit, how to show /deny 2nd round control in opps suit, forcing pass issues, etc.

[42]

Hi!
I would really appreciate to participate and follow the lessons but I live in Europe and the timescedules so far didn't fit for me Unfortunately I must go to work for 20 more years and they want me to come in the morning
My favourites for lessons would be:

• in the field of competition --> to distinguish better strength and distribution
  
• slam bidding; to find slams that don't have many HCP
  
• Doubles

Caren

[luis]

I don't know what you are talking about :-) but...
I've done a series on competitive bidding for the BIL and one about the Law also for the BIL. While they were intended for BIL members they could be interesting for more advanced players, as I say beginers are beginers because they are learning not because they are idiots so even if some topics look complex it's surprising to see how they can absorb the ideas and improve.

[kenberg]

My preference:

Mikeh has announced an upcoming session with himself and three others playing randomly dealt hands and commenting on the fly, with discussion to follow. Far and away, this sort of thing is my first choice. I am interested in hearing the thoughts of solid experienced players on the choices that come up in everyday bridge. A recent auction began 1H-Pass-2H-2S(by partner). When RHO bid 4H I had to choose between the 4S sac and hoping I had the defense to beat 4H. I strongly believe it is these everyday choices, rather than exotic conventions, that determine winning and losing. No one gets all of these right, but better players get more of them right. I express my gratitude for those willing to put themselves out there, explaining their thoughts, fully aware that on any given hand their choice might be disastrous.

Ken