BBO Discussion Forums: competing at low level - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

competing at low level would you continue?

Poll: What's you choice here? (32 member(s) have cast votes)

What's you choice here?

  1. pass (7 votes [21.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.88%

  2. 2NT (5 votes [15.62%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.62%

  3. 3D (3 votes [9.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.38%

  4. 3H (16 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  5. I would have bid 2H(WJS) before (1 votes [3.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.12%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   adhoc3 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 247
  • Joined: 2005-September-16

Posted 2006-January-04, 08:50

QJx AJT9xx xx Qx

Vul vs Non

PD opened 1D in 2nd place:

pass-----1D----pass-----1H
dbl-------2D----2S-------???

Pard's hand hide below:

Spoiler


Anything wrong with this sequence?

Regards,

Jack
0

#2 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2006-January-04, 09:17

I'd just pass. The spade and club values are defensive, and partner will a stiff spade is likely to balance.
0

#3 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2006-January-04, 10:01

Since pard will have 6 diamonds 99% of the time, I would bid 3. If pard can't find another bid after this, we probably belong in a partscore anyway. If he bids 3 or 3, I'll gladly oblige with 4 and 3NT respectively.

At matchpoints there's a case for bidding 3.
0

#4 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,638
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2006-January-04, 10:34

I'll go with 2NT. This points us towards the most likely game. Some possible hands:

xx xx KQJTxx AKx (fortunately the auction basically marks spades to be 4-4)
xx xx AQJTxx Axx (after winning the third spade, an easy 3nt if behave)
xx Qx AJTxxx AJx (there will be some interesting guesses to make, but 3NT/4 has play)

I would not expect partner to balance on any of these hands. The third hand might pass 2NT, but this also is an okay spot (2NT probably makes, we have maybe 6 tricks on defense against 2).
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#5 User is offline   toothbrush 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 94
  • Joined: 2005-April-05
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:bridge and golf

Posted 2006-January-04, 10:50

I still have ambition for game when partner bid voluntary 2. With at least 22hcp together and a certain fit I'm pretty sure I won't let them play 2 undoubled.
I prefer bidding 3. To bid NT, I need more support in (3card with a top honour)
0

#6 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,723
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-January-04, 12:20

awm, on Jan 4 2006, 11:34 AM, said:

I'll go with 2NT. This points us towards the most likely game. Some possible hands:

xx xx KQJTxx AKx (fortunately the auction basically marks spades to be 4-4)
xx xx AQJTxx Axx (after winning the third spade, an easy 3nt if behave)
xx Qx AJTxxx AJx (there will be some interesting guesses to make, but 3NT/4 has play)

I would not expect partner to balance on any of these hands. The third hand might pass 2NT, but this also is an okay spot (2NT probably makes, we have maybe 6 tricks on defense against 2).

Ditto

btw object to partner's opening bid, prefer pass not 1D.
0

#7 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2006-January-04, 18:19

i'd bid 3
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#8 User is offline   tysen2k 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 406
  • Joined: 2004-March-25

Posted 2006-January-04, 18:41

3 with 3 as a close second.

Tysen
A bit of blatant self-pimping - I've got a new poker book that's getting good reviews.
0

#9 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,289
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2006-January-05, 00:16

I'm a believer that the free redid should actually show a reason to bid - not just, Oh, I've got an extra diamond stuck in here with my hearts sort of bid. Although it's close, I don't think partner can figure out just quite this much hand if I pass - certainly not the 6th heart in a pretty good suit. If we do have any game coming it is most likely a heart game so I'm going to try 3H.

Winston

P.S. I just looked at the hand and see no reason to trot out a free 2D bid when you can pass and show weakness and no great reason to bid. The pass actually makes it easier to bid 3H as there is a greater expectation of a usable fit.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
0

#10 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2006-January-05, 03:41

whereagles, on Jan 4 2006, 04:01 PM, said:

Since pard will have 6 diamonds 99% of the time, I would bid 3. If pard can't find another bid after this, we probably belong in a partscore anyway. If he bids 3 or 3, I'll gladly oblige with 4 and 3NT respectively.

At matchpoints there's a case for bidding 3.

Partner has 6 only 65% of the time, the other 35% he has 7+ :P

I would bid 3 withno strong conviction.
0

#11 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2006-January-05, 10:55

Fluffy, on Jan 5 2006, 09:41 AM, said:

Partner has 6 only 65% of the time, the other 35% he has 7+ :P

Hum.. yes :P
0

#12 User is offline   Kalvan14 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 839
  • Joined: 2005-October-20

Posted 2006-January-06, 04:54

3 for me. Too good a suit, and the black Qs can complement pard's values
0

#13 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,842
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-January-07, 04:57

Hi,

scraped, ignored the auction.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#14 User is offline   bearmum 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 757
  • Joined: 2003-July-06
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 2006-January-07, 07:44

adhoc3, on Jan 5 2006, 03:50 AM, said:

QJx AJT9xx xx Qx

Vul vs Non

PD opened 1D in 2nd place:

pass-----1D----pass-----1H
dbl-------2D----2S-------???

Pard's hand hide below:

Spoiler


Anything wrong with this sequence?

Regards,

Jack

PASS wtp ?
0

#15 User is offline   adhoc3 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 247
  • Joined: 2005-September-16

Posted 2006-January-07, 08:20

Quote

The pass actually makes it easier to bid 3H as there is a greater expectation of a usable fit.
:)
0

#16 User is offline   HeartA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,016
  • Joined: 2004-October-17

Posted 2006-January-07, 19:05

H is too good to be ignored.
Senshu
0

#17 User is offline   jdeegan 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,427
  • Joined: 2005-August-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Economics
    Finance
    Bridge bidding theory
    Cooking
    Downhill skiing

Posted 2006-January-08, 00:32

:P The majority votes for 3 over 3. My problem with this is that pard is marked with 6 or 7 diamonds, one or two spades, and there are seven clubs to be divided between two hands (assuming doubler has four clubs). The point is that there is not much room for hearts in pard's hand. 2-1-6-4 or 2-1-7-3 patterns will play a trick better in diamonds most of the time.
0

#18 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,723
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-January-08, 00:55

jdeegan, on Jan 8 2006, 01:32 AM, said:

:P  The majority votes for 3 over 3.  My problem with this is that pard is marked with 6 or 7 diamonds, one or two spades, and there are seven clubs to be divided between two hands (assuming doubler has four clubs).  The point is that there is not much room for hearts in pard's hand.  2-1-6-4 or 2-1-7-3 patterns will play a trick better in diamonds most of the time.

I very respectfully disagree, the real problem is partner should pass not open the bidding.
0

#19 User is offline   foo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,380
  • Joined: 2003-September-24

Posted 2006-January-09, 13:08

adhoc3, on Jan 4 2006, 09:50 AM, said:

QJx AJT9xx xx Qx

Vul vs Non

PD opened 1D in 2nd place:

pass-----1D----pass-----1H
dbl-------2D----2S-------???

Pard's hand hide below:

Spoiler


Anything wrong with this sequence?

Regards,

Jack

Pass is not a Logical Alternative in my mind.

A= PD's simple rebid denies a Maximum, it does not guarantee a minimum. If he has 14-15 HCP, we probably belong in game. If our hands have nice stoppers in the side suits between us and PD has a good suit, we may have 9 tricks in 3N on even less than 24 HCP. If our hands fit well and PD has 3 's we may be able to make 4. Etc.

B= We have an Invitational hand, not a minimum. We owe PD a 2nd bid.

C= We have both stoppers and 6 's (PD only knows about 4 of them)

"C" is actually a problem since you have an embarrassment of riches and not enough room to show both.

I'd bid 3 since 4M is the preferred Game in Bridge and PD can always accept by bidding 3 when they don't have 2 's and need a stop from us for 3N. There is the risk that PD has a minimum w/ only 1-H (although a void is unlikely given that PD can't have many given our hand and the auction), but the odds favor PD having 2-3 's.
0

#20 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-January-09, 13:21

toothbrush, on Jan 4 2006, 11:50 AM, said:

I still have ambition for game when partner bid voluntary 2. With at least 22hcp together and a certain fit I'm pretty sure I won't let them play 2 undoubled.
I prefer bidding 3. To bid NT, I need more support in (3card with a top honour)

Does the voluntary bid show extras, or full values or just long(er) diamonds. I would expect the latter and pass to see if pard wants to carry on.
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users