Help
Winstonm, on Dec 31 2005, 09:12 AM, said:
----------
KQ109642, 4, KJxx, x.
---------
As much as I'd like to bid 4S with this hand, it simply doesn't qualify in my definition so I'd have to content myself with 3S if I were to bid. Does this risk missing game? No doubt. But on the other hand, it helps partner know what to do when I do jump to game.
-----------
AKJ10xx, AQ, KQxx, x. When I bid 4S with this hand, partner is in better position to evaluate his control cards for slam.
-----------
Winston
KQ109642, 4, KJxx, x.
---------
As much as I'd like to bid 4S with this hand, it simply doesn't qualify in my definition so I'd have to content myself with 3S if I were to bid. Does this risk missing game? No doubt. But on the other hand, it helps partner know what to do when I do jump to game.
-----------
AKJ10xx, AQ, KQxx, x. When I bid 4S with this hand, partner is in better position to evaluate his control cards for slam.
-----------
Winston
Take the hand(KQ109642, 4, KJxx, x.) i will jump 4♠ too.but i should bid a double at the firt with the another hand (AKJ10xx, AQ, KQxx, x.) is it any problem to start a t/o double?
Is these the essential reason for our divergence?
And i oppugn that you can hold ♦KJXX when opps overcall 5♦ and you partner will pass your balanced double after his own forcing pass:
3♣- 4♠- 5♦- pass
pass -double-pass-pass?
is it an actual affair on the table ?he has sigleton or void on ♦ with an 9hcps to opening hand{since 5♦ deny 5♣ contract ,it's the most possibility a special 7-4 suiter contain ♦+♥}