Full hand hiden below.
Lookout
#2
Posted 2005-December-22, 00:43
1N-2S* Club transfer
2N*-3S** *Accepts transfer. **Shortness, game force
4H*-P *I don't have spades either. How about a 4/3?
#3
Posted 2005-December-22, 01:05
1NT-2C-2H-3C*-3D*-3H*-4H-p
2C=stayman but might not have 4m(can show assorted shapes later)
2H=4Hs
3C*=shortness in 'a' major
3D*=asks
3H*=short spades
4H=to play
Regards,
Robert
#4
Posted 2005-December-22, 01:46
Either it makes or not.
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#6
Posted 2005-December-22, 05:27
It is possible that 4H is better (as here), but the way to find out is not via Stayman. If partner has QJx in ♠ and xxxx in ♥ then I am not sure that 4♥ is the place to be.
Eric
#7
Posted 2005-December-22, 06:43
Uninformative auctions in such hands should be a long term winner (defenders may err on opening lead and/or early switches), even if in a few hands we land in inferior contracts.
#9
Posted 2005-December-22, 08:04
#10
Posted 2005-December-22, 08:24
mcphee, on Dec 22 2005, 02:04 PM, said:
Agree with this completely. In my experience it is a serious error to show shortness in this auction with a "game only" hand that contains a singleton Ace or King (and with some hands containing a singleton Queen). Showing your spade shortness with this hand amounts to begging your partner to make the wrong decision. For example, with Qxx of spades partner will rarely opt for 3NT. Even with Axx he will often choose to play in clubs. Sometimes he will be right, but more often than not you will end up in a silly 5 clubs instead of a cold 3NT.
Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
#11
Posted 2005-December-22, 10:29
fred, on Dec 22 2005, 09:24 AM, said:
mcphee, on Dec 22 2005, 02:04 PM, said:
Agree with this completely. In my experience it is a serious error to show shortness in this auction with a "game only" hand that contains a singleton Ace or King (and with some hands containing a singleton Queen). Showing your spade shortness with this hand amounts to begging your partner to make the wrong decision. For example, with Qxx of spades partner will rarely opt for 3NT. Even with Axx he will often choose to play in clubs. Sometimes he will be right, but more often than not you will end up in a silly 5 clubs instead of a cold 3NT.
Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
I agree and 3N would have been my call as well; the purpose of the post was so show that rather broadly accepted methods are available to pursue hands of this type if one is so inclined (I am not so inclined on this hand- I bid 3N.) One hand that worked out well does not prove or disprove anything.
Winston
#12
Posted 2005-December-22, 17:38
fred, on Dec 22 2005, 09:24 AM, said:
mcphee, on Dec 22 2005, 02:04 PM, said:
Agree with this completely. In my experience it is a serious error to show shortness in this auction with a "game only" hand that contains a singleton Ace or King (and with some hands containing a singleton Queen). Showing your spade shortness with this hand amounts to begging your partner to make the wrong decision. For example, with Qxx of spades partner will rarely opt for 3NT. Even with Axx he will often choose to play in clubs. Sometimes he will be right, but more often than not you will end up in a silly 5 clubs instead of a cold 3NT.
Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
Well said, Mcphee and Fred. I do completely agree with you both
#13
Posted 2005-December-22, 18:03
♠K might be the stopper.
As to the full hand: Too bad ♠ Ace is off side. The West hand would lead a small spade to our king. Next!
Your partner was masterminding. For example if partner has:
North: QJx,Axxx,QJx,KQx
Same 3NT, same lead to King and Ace, claim. Good luck in 4♥!
#14
Posted 2005-December-22, 20:59
http://cf71632485.spaces.live.com/blog/cns...!1015.entry
bridge blog002:
http://cvl7163cf2485...st-22291-1.html

Help

Your partner opened 1NT 15-17 after 3 passes, what's your observation on future? What would you bid?