It is your turn, pd
#1
Posted 2003-October-06, 12:42
S: J9XX
H: TXX
D: AXX
C: XXX
sitting south, you heard west, as dealer, opened 1H and pd overcalled 1S. East passed and you raised to 2S. West passed and pd made a game trial with 3c. Now, east came in with 3d.
1) What do you do?
2) Suppose you pass, pd dbl, what do you do now?
#2
Posted 2003-October-06, 13:11
I'm not in this problem because I'd have passed 1s :-) as far as I know 1 level overcalls are not forcing and I'm very happy to play 1s 4333 pattern with one ace and no values, argh. The 9th trump is an illusion without a ruffing feature in my hand.
Had I bid 2s, which I don't like over a 3c game trial I'd have bid 3s inmediately. Hope 3s means "I should have passed 1s pd"
Once pd reopens with a double I bid 3s. "Why did I bid 2s, why why...."
I guess that the 1s overcall is wrong and pd should have doubled 1h.
Luis
#3
Posted 2003-October-06, 13:29
secondly, if pd dbl 3d, would u leave it or move to 3s?
#4
Posted 2003-October-06, 13:34
Quote
S: J9XX
H: TXX
D: AXX
C: XXX
sitting south, you heard west, as dealer, opened 1H and pd overcalled 1S. East passed and you raised to 2S. West passed and pd made a game trial with 3c. Now, east came in with 3d.
1) What do you do?
2) Suppose you pass, pd dbl, what do you do now?
I join Luis is objecting to the auction. I have been known to jump to 3S with a lot less, but with 4333 and being vul, 3S immediately is out of the question. Also, I don't want to encourage partner to lead a spade so raising spades is a little iffy.
However, I do have SEVERAL ways to raise spades on this auction (the way I play). I could use fit jumps, or 2NT useful four card raise or better (just less than limit raise to game force), 3H as mixed raise fpir card raise, and 2H as constructive 3 card raise or better, so the way I play, this 2S bid promises not very much more than I actually hold. Still, I would not bid 2S, but primarily because I do not want to encouraging partner to bid on or to lead a spade. If you force me into this auction, I would bid 3S over the optional double at IMPS, as I can't risk them making for game. At matchpoints, I will go with the LOTT and pass. I expect partner to have 3 diamonds for his double, so they are in a seven card fit. East likely has six, maybe seven. But the risk of them making for a game swing, with East likley having six... what the heck, it is only matchpoints. Partner will be happy I have a trump trick and three trumps.
And finally, of course, I do not PASS over 3DIAMONDS, as pass and then bid is strong than pass and pull. So the second assumption is wrong too... So in reality, over 3D I bid 3S at both imps and matchpoints.
Ben
#5
Posted 2003-October-06, 14:42
I recognize the danger that a 2S raise might encourage partner to lead a spade. However, I am more worried that passing will lead partner to expect that I have a doubleton in Spades rather than guess that I chose to supress 4 card support.
I'm not sure whether I agree with Ben that passing over 3D and then pulling a reopening double to 3S shows a strong hand. Logically this would apply if a forcing pass had been established, however, it doesn't seem to make sense on this hand.
#6
Posted 2003-October-06, 15:00
Quote
This really is not a fine point. This is generally accepted methods, when you have found a fit, and when your partner has FORCED you to a specific level (say 2 or 3 level), then the weakest bid is to complete the bidding to the three level. Let me give a couple of example auction (other than the one in this thread).
1H-P-3C (bergen)-X
3H <<-- weaker than any other bid
1H-P-3C-3D; (?) -- we all play maximal dbl, I am sure, but pass is stronger than 3H
(1H)-1S-(2H)-3H 3H = limit raise or mixed raise
DBL-P <<--- game try, again bidding 3S
Again, I don't think this rule is unusual... so that, on any of these auctions, if partner now makes an optional double back in, to bid your suit again is BETTER than if you bid it immeidately... or at least the way I play. This is also right out of a variety of books, including my "bridge bible" partnership bidding by R/S.
Ben
#7
Posted 2003-October-06, 15:42
I understand that point that you are trying to make, however, I am not sure whether I accept it as an optimal treatment.
Case in point.
Suppose that the auction has started
1S - 2S
3C
I agree with your assertion that the 3C response forces us to 3S.
However, lets contrast this with the auction
(1H) - 1S - (P) - 2S
(P) - 3C - (3D) - ???
I fail to understand why I am now "FORCED" to bid in this auction.
Yes, partner has made a game try.
Yes, if RHO had passed over 3C, I would be obligated to bid.
However, RHO's 3D now permits me to pass.
I fail to see why I am obliged to bid an immediate 3S with some crappy hand.
This seems like a wonderful way to turn +100 from defending 3D into -50 declaring 3S.
#8
Posted 2003-October-06, 16:07
First, consider the auction
1H - (P) - 3C - (X), where 3C is an artifical bid showing 4+ card trump support and a constructive raise. In this auction, defining a Pass by Opener as
"I want to play 3CX" seems to be of limited utility.
In this case, it is certainly reasonable to say that pass followed by pull is stronger than an immediate pull.
Equivalently, in an auction like
(1H) - 1S - (2H) - 3H
(X) - Pass
it would be ridiculous to define a pass as showing a hand that wants to declare 3HX.
However, this situation is very different from the case in which RHO has made a natural 3 level overcall. its been a while since I read Robson and Segal, however, I seem to recall that most of their discussions of forcing pass establishment had to do with 5 level auctions rather than 3 level auctions. I agree completely that there are auctions at the 3 level in which a forcing pass can be established, however, the original example really doesn't seem like it should be one.
#9
Posted 2003-October-06, 16:43
S: J9XX
H: TXX
D: AXX
C: XXX
sitting south, you heard west, as dealer, opened 1H and pd overcalled 1S. East passed and you raised to 2S. West passed and pd made a game trial with 3c. Now, east came in with 3d.
1) What do you do?
2) Suppose you pass, pd dbl, what do you do now?
Quite frankly I cannot imagine passing with 4 trumps and an Ace, so 2S is clear cut for me. As Richard points out, "bridge is a bidder's game".
The shape is poor but so what? In the presented auction I pass 3D and after pd's X I bid 3S.
#10
Posted 2003-October-06, 17:16
#11
Posted 2003-October-06, 17:32
#12
Posted 2003-October-06, 19:05
In a section of R/S Partnership Bidding at Bridge (entitled “Passing to show strength”), (page 149+) they said (remainder quoted from their book in green)….
“You may be surprised to learn that there is another sort of forcing pass in fit auctions that lays no claim to the hand. Often, in fact, it will be clear that the hand belongs to your opponents….
Using an ‘idle’ bid: We will start with a fairly simple auction: 1S – (P) – 3C – (3D); P – (P) – ? Your 3C bid showed a fit-raise to the three level; so should you now bid 3S automatically and go back to sleep? Would you ever pass?....
Obviously it would be a strange state of affairs if you allowed the opposition to play 3D undoubled on this sequence. After all, you’ve already announced an offensive raise to 3S. Therefore the auction :
1S – (P) – 3C – (3D); P – (P) – P
should not exist. Does that mean partner’s pass is an ‘idle’ bid - simply a ‘transfer’ to 3S? No. Clearly opener should be able to invite 4S - either by bidding 3S or by passing. (On this sequence opener could bid 3H but why shouldn’t that guarantee a heart suit?)
You might think it is more ‘natural’ for pass to show the weaker hand. But there are good reasons for playing the bids the other way round - that is, 3S showing a hand unwilling to progress further; with pass indicatinga stronger hand. First, pass is more flexible. It can be used to keep the bidding low on strong hands - it is forcing, and therefore unlimited. It allows partner to make a return game try in many auctions - in the sequence above, for example, responder can bid 3S to show interest, without committing the partnership to game. Also, it gives partner the chance to double with a maximum defensive hand in the context of the auction - which could be just what the doctor ordered. Secondly, 3S denies the opponents flexibility when they are most likely to require it.
If this concept (A kind of Principle of Fast Arrival) appeals to you, or if you want to know more, get the Book by Robson and Segal and read it for yourself.
Ben
#13
Posted 2003-October-06, 19:08
Quote
I play all doubles that are not conventional for takeout before a fit is found (a transfer after 1NT or 2NT, and any preempt by us I assume we have a fit). Once a fit is found, DBLS become as Ron said, good defense for the auction to date kind of thing.
#14
Posted 2003-October-07, 03:45
Quote
S: J9XX
H: TXX
D: AXX
C: XXX
sitting south, you heard west, as dealer, opened 1H and pd overcalled 1S. East passed and you raised to 2S. West passed and pd made a game trial with 3c. Now, east came in with 3d.
1) What do you do?
2) Suppose you pass, pd dbl, what do you do now?
1) be very angry at partner and pass
2) be very angry at partner again/still, and bid 3S...
The way I play it, if I have an invitational hand or better I make a cuebid. Now I can have 0 HCP and 3-3-3-4. Your partner described his hand well enough, and if you raise to 2- or 3- or even 4-level, he should count his cards and bid on with 14 cards and pass with only 13 cards (I heard that line somewhere on this forum and I think it's great). That means I have NO GAME INTEREST, so he shouldn't even try!
#15
Posted 2003-October-07, 05:23
and i agree with the pass showing a stronger hand than a direct 3S (after 1S/p/3C/3D/p/p)... makes sense to me
#16
Posted 2003-October-07, 06:30
S; AKQX
H: AJX
D: X
C: KXXXX
West holds:
S; TX
H: KQ9XX
D: JTXX
C: AX
3dx-1. 4s should be made easily.
#17
Posted 2003-October-07, 07:21
1. I play raptor with any strength, so after 1 Heart, I had an easy 1 NT bid. If that had get me into the "cold" game? Don`t think so.
2. I surely had bid 2 Spade with responders hand.
3. I have no idea, if pass and later bidding is stronger or vice versa. But I had believed, that passing and pulling is very weak.
4. That is why I had passed first and bid 3 Spade later.
5. I dislike the X from your pd. Does he really prefer to play 3 D X to 3 Spade? But I must admit, that I had seen no better bid avaiable. Maybe 3 Heart to get you to 3 NT with a 3343 hand :-)
But ihmo this is the price for the 1 Spade bid with just 4 Spades.
6. I doubt, that 4 Spade is a good contract:
You need trumps 3-2 (68%), a heart finesse (about 90% cause of the bidding), the ace of club onside and you must develop your club suit without letting them ruff.
Should be wrong to bid game here.
Kind Regards
Roland
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#18
Posted 2003-October-07, 08:16
Like Roland, I don't believe the North hand has a double REGARDLESS if you play pass by south show minimum hand or more than minimum (which I play). If you play it shows more than a minimum, the correct bid with north is probably 4S over (3D)-P-(P)-?. If you play it as a minimum, double is STILL WRONG. This is not a place where takeout doubles apply. Playing if passing over 3D shows weakness, with the north hand I would bid 3H. In this situaion, over 3D, a 3S bid would be to play, so 3H is a "re-game try." IT is NOT trying to get into 3NT (although you may end up there). The reason being it is the only bid left open to you below 3S. Therefore it is a general game try.
Now, back to RAPTOR for a minute. With the north hand over 1H, I would bid 1NT showing spades and a longer minor. South would bid 2S (a signoff), but north with 5 loser hand will make a game try over this by bidding 3S. (The rare 4 loser hand would make someother game try or simply bid game). As south, with only one cover card (diamond ACE) and 4333 distribution, I have an easy pass of the pass the game try at all forms of the game except at IMPS when vulnerable. At imps vulnerable, I will at least consider bidding game as I really hate missing vulnerable games at imps.
Ben
#19
Posted 2003-October-07, 08:41
4s is not that bad i think. c ace is marked onside with a passed east who bid 3d later. the only problem is you may encounter a forcing defense with d lead.
One more question, would my pass after 3d show 3card raise and 3s show a 4card raise?
Raising to 2s is correct i think no matter what pd have. It should be a two way shot. It is very effective if west has a good hand.
2s should not encourage pd too much. if i have a good hand, i will start with a cuebid. 2s should show a min hand like what i have here to a max hand with 8/9 points.
#20
Posted 2003-October-07, 09:20
(1H) - 1NT - (P) - 2S
(P) -
At this point in time, if the 1NT bidder choses to make a game try, he should do so by bidding 3C and showing his suit rather than 3S.

Help
