To bid or not to bid
#1 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-December-08, 02:01
A ) new suits are forcing
and
B ) new suits are non forcing?
#3
Posted 2005-December-08, 03:20
A) Pass. All other alternatives are guesses, hoping luck is in. My style, with a good hand and no fit I have to cue bid and then bid - not always great but this is defensive bidding and it lacks in accuracy. I also have jump shifts to encourage as well as some numbers of NTs. But when I have an OK hand with a reason to bid and no fit I'm stuck playing this as forcing but non-forcing at least I can keep the auction alive with a medium type hand.
B) 2H. Not only should this be non-forcing but it should deny spade support.
C) 1D-2C-P-2H. Now, after the 2-level overcall, advancer's bid should be a 1-round force.
Winston
#4
Posted 2005-December-08, 04:09
Kalvan14's two votes are 100% correct(they agree with mine)
1) pass 2)2H
The decision is not even close on 1)
On 2) I am making the bid based on a possible heart game. If the Heart suit were a minor, I would pass here.
The lead directing part of a 2H call also causes me to lean towards bidding rather than a pass.
I changed from transfer advances to non forcing suits to get the 'lead advantage.'
Bdding 2Ds and putting down Kx or KJx in LHO's suit and have the lead come 'into' LHOs suit was a bothersome part of transfer advances.
Regards,
Robert
#5
Posted 2005-December-08, 04:38
ii) 2H
If partner is a fan of 'girlie' overcalls (i.e. would think 1S is correct rather than 2S on KQxxx and out) I pass on both.
#8
Posted 2005-December-08, 10:05
One idea, I like is new suits BELOW their opened suit are forcing (so here, 2♣ would be forcing). And from their suit up to partners suits are "transfers". So here, after, the choice would be.
(1♦) - 1♠ - (pass) - ?
- 2♣ = forcing
- 2♦ = shows hearts, weak or strong. If with ♠ support, this would lead directing. Partner doesn't have to complete the transfer
- 2♥ = constructive raise to 2♠
- 2♠ = "competetive weak raise"
- 2NT = strong game try, with ♠ fit
- 3 level new suit, fit jump
- 3♦ = mixed raise.
#11
Posted 2005-December-08, 10:48
Fluffy, on Dec 8 2005, 11:19 AM, said:
I suspect a mis-read of the problem...
For me, the 1st one is very close: but I tend to bid on these hands so the truth is I'd probably bid 2♥
On the second, 2♥ is clear
I play transfer advances anyway (so would swap these problems for others), and would bid 2♦ on both: altho this hand is not great for the method because I am sort of caught between having a good hand and a bad one. If partner merely accepts the transfer, that to me says that he would pass a weak 2♥ opening, so I am done despite that good ♠A and the hidden 5 card side suit.
#12
Posted 2005-December-08, 10:54
FrancesHinden, on Dec 8 2005, 05:38 AM, said:
ii) 2H
If partner is a fan of 'girlie' overcalls (i.e. would think 1S is correct rather than 2S on KQxxx and out) I pass on both.
1) pass
2) 2H with trepidation.
Yes, one partner plays "girlie" overcalls at fav. vul. I would not be surprised if my RHO has a huge hand with spades.
Qxxxx=xx=Kxxx=Qx by partner would not shock me.
#13
Posted 2005-December-08, 12:49
mikeh, on Dec 8 2005, 04:48 PM, said:
Fluffy, on Dec 8 2005, 11:19 AM, said:
I suspect a mis-read of the problem...
Ugh sorry. I missread it.
I change my votes for 1NT and 1NT
#14 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-December-08, 12:51
#15
Posted 2005-December-08, 13:07
#16
Posted 2005-December-08, 18:43
Btw, given the posted hand, it will take some convincing to make me play NT.

Help
