ugly hand your plan?
#1
Posted 2005-September-25, 18:06
Both vul.
♠9864
♥AKQ
♦982
♣875
N E S W
2♠ P P
X P ?
2♠ was weak, by a solid player, who would always hold 6 cards 1st seat vul.
2N by you here (after partner's double) would be lebensohl
Your bid, and if you choose 2N (lebensohl) your plan over 3♣
#2 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-September-25, 18:11
#3
Posted 2005-September-25, 18:19
#4
Posted 2005-September-25, 21:19
Only question remaining is passing 2♠, opponents will have around 18 HCP, with 10 of them in ♠, rest of the HCP in the outside suits, missplaced in dummy, at MP pass would be very risky, but our best chance for a top. At IMPs its a suicided, so I'll just try 2NT+3♥
#5 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-September-25, 22:10
shoeless, on Sep 25 2005, 07:19 PM, said:
In leb 2N then 3H is a signoff whereas 3H directly is constructive. It's not liek when pard opens 1N because there you can pass, here you are forced to bid.
#6
Posted 2005-September-25, 22:59
#7
Posted 2005-September-25, 23:19
#8
Posted 2005-September-26, 01:46
Passing is out, this means I will bid 2 NT,
intending to bid 3H over 3C.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted 2005-September-26, 01:52
#10
Posted 2005-September-26, 07:57
#11
Posted 2005-September-26, 08:15
Options are 2NT (lebehnshol) or 2NT (scramble) depending upon your agreement with partner or three of a suit. Clearly scramble would work better here as you could pass partners rebid. Sadly, I play lebehnshol here, which so 2NT followed by 3♥. Obviously I am not entirely happy with this choice.
#12
Posted 2005-September-26, 08:25
How many defensive tricks are we providing to pard ?
I would guess at most 2.
How many defensive tricks does pard provides for his double ?
If he has a normal double, he will (hopefully) provide 2-3 tricks.
So are we going to risk to colect only 5 defensive tricks ? Or walking on a tight rope to fdefeat the contract by 1 doubled ?
I gues that from my choice not to defend doubled, everybody (who still did not knw that) will finally discover I am a bad defender
#13
Posted 2005-September-26, 09:27
This hand is so ugly that I would go with the others : 2NT leb and then 3♥
Alain
PS : I will never pass that !
#14
Posted 2005-September-26, 10:53
My analysis fails if opener has AKQxxx, because then opener has no outside entries for the forcing defense.
#15
Posted 2005-September-26, 14:00
#16
Posted 2005-September-26, 15:00
Al_U_Card, on Sep 26 2005, 04:00 PM, said:
Watch out... incoming!!!!
Well, I am not ready to rule out partner having five hearts... it is hard to bid 3♥ vul on jack fifth (at best). I am also not willing to bid 3♠ because how many ♠ do you think partner can have? Two, three at most. IF he has three, at least they can't lead one. But all of us are worried about finding a place to land at the three level and you are forcing to the three level (in most cases)...after all, if partner has enough with a spade stopper to make 3NT playable, you would have heard 2NT or 3NT balance bid out of him.
On the other hand, who knows, some of the time 3♠ will work out... .just in the long run, it seems wacky
#17
Posted 2005-September-26, 15:04

Help
