http://tinyurl.com/py2c38n
I think it would be preferable if in this auction GIB gave preference to 3S
Page 1 of 1
Giving Preference with 3
#2
Posted 2014-September-06, 13:37
actually the 3♦ bid was also wrong as it denies 3-card spades support
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#3
Posted 2014-September-07, 15:25
To address Helene's point first, I believe that GIB plays support doubles through 2H. That is how I do it and it's the most common treatment.
To the main point, and without being personal, I believe that Fred Gitelman should be quite embarrassed, from a business perspective, to be promoting a bridge-playing program that has been in use for quite some years, and that is still making egregious blunders such as this. Perhaps GIB is too small a part of the overall BBO enterprise to merit investing sufficient resources to improve the programming and bid descriptions to a decent level. I saw a recent hand with similar bidding where GIB incorrectly failed to take a S preference with Qx vs xx in H, but the pass of 3H here defies any rationality.
For my part, I will say that I am paying to play in ACBL games with these GIB robots, and as a consumer I demand better.
To the main point, and without being personal, I believe that Fred Gitelman should be quite embarrassed, from a business perspective, to be promoting a bridge-playing program that has been in use for quite some years, and that is still making egregious blunders such as this. Perhaps GIB is too small a part of the overall BBO enterprise to merit investing sufficient resources to improve the programming and bid descriptions to a decent level. I saw a recent hand with similar bidding where GIB incorrectly failed to take a S preference with Qx vs xx in H, but the pass of 3H here defies any rationality.
For my part, I will say that I am paying to play in ACBL games with these GIB robots, and as a consumer I demand better.
#4
Posted 2014-September-09, 07:43
Thanks for reporting.
Fixed in next version. It won't find problem to pick the fit call.
Btw, 3♠ would have mean: 5+ ♦; 3+ ♠; 10-14 total points
Fixed in next version. It won't find problem to pick the fit call.
Btw, 3♠ would have mean: 5+ ♦; 3+ ♠; 10-14 total points
#5
Posted 2014-September-09, 08:59
Page 1 of 1