norths bid 2nd round south bid
#7
Posted 2020-April-22, 14:30
'minimum, balanced, no spade stopper' - okay, I'm 5=4 in the minors, but is that really worth mentioning with this random 13-count that actually would hope to play in hearts?
And absolutely, playing a K/S style weak NT, this is a weak NT. Partner's going to expect more than this for 1♦.
#9
Posted 2020-April-23, 03:16
Cyberyeti, on 2020-April-22, 14:39, said:
I am no fan of Support Doubles in the context of a weak NT system. But that is because we use Double to show the strong NT type hand. Distinguishing four and five-card club holdings is far less important in my opinion.
#10
Posted 2020-April-23, 03:55
Tramticket, on 2020-April-23, 03:16, said:
With my regular partner, we don't actually play that often, so saving effort in remembering system via blanket agreements is useful, we just play this for all the "3 suits bid" auctions and it's much more valuable where you would have to bid the suit at the 3 level. The knowledge when partner has 3 of them that you have 5 is important.
#12
Posted 2020-April-23, 13:45
mycroft, on 2020-April-22, 14:30, said:
'minimum, balanced, no spade stopper' - okay, I'm 5=4 in the minors, but is that really worth mentioning with this random 13-count that actually would hope to play in hearts?
And absolutely, playing a K/S style weak NT, this is a weak NT. Partner's going to expect more than this for 1♦.
this is 11.8 CCCC count. 11.6 without the 9s. Kaplan's point count.
So it is too weak for a K-S opening.
CCCC hates two honors doubleton: the ♥ J only counted .45 .
#16
Posted 2020-April-23, 18:16
#17
Posted 2020-April-23, 21:17
dbl would show 3 card h (support dbl)
1nt minimum with good ♠ stopper
2♣ 5-5 non forcing
2♦ 6+ card non forcing
2♥ 4 card fit non forcing
2♠ game forcing
2nt invite 16-17 good ♠ stopper
3♣ 5-5 game forcing
3♦ 6+ card game forcing (or if agreed barrage 7+ card)
3♥ invite 4 card
3♠/4♣ splinter (or if agreed a cue) 4+ card ♥
3nt to play 18+ good ♠ stopper
4♦ cue 4+ card ♥
4♥ to play
4♠/5♣ exclusion BLW 4+ card ♥
4nt RKC 4+ card ♥
#18
Posted 2020-April-24, 03:26
johnu, on 2020-April-23, 18:16, said:
Please stop patronising somebody who actually knows what's played in his own part of the world.
I actually had to look up what an Altoid was, they're pretty much unknown here despite being invented here.
#19
Posted 2020-April-24, 11:27
Cyberyeti, on 2020-April-24, 03:26, said:
I actually had to look up what an Altoid was, they're pretty much unknown here despite being invented here.
I think (I hope) he was referring to your making an accidental pun. You said FOR US. But the first time I read that, I thought you meant "For the USA."
Keep well.
Mike
#20
Posted 2020-April-24, 11:34
bluenikki, on 2020-April-23, 13:37, said:
Do you believe this is unbalanced?
Of course it is. You have 9 cards in the minors, and you have to show partner that now, so that he can make an intelligent decision at his next turn. If you pass, West is likely to raise to 2S. Now what is your partner supposed to do with:
xxx
Qxxxx
KQx
xx
or
xxx
Axxx
xx
Kxxx
He is stuck guessing, and if I'm your partner, I'm probably just going to pass unless I'm NV at MPs, and maybe even then. You don't want me to pass; you want me to bid 3m. It might make; we might push them to 3S; and even if we go set, at MPs, we'll likely go set less than -110. You have to show your minor holdings immediately, so that partner has an easy 3D on hand 1 or 3c on hand 2.
Cheers,
mike