BBO Discussion Forums: pet peeve thread - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 57 Pages +
  • « First
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

pet peeve thread

#1021 User is offline   kenberg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,212
  • Joined: 2004-September-22
  • Location:Northern Maryland

Posted 2016-April-29, 07:09

View PostPhil, on 2016-April-28, 22:08, said:

There is a set of words that I use but get tripped up by my spellchecker.

- Agendize
- Incentivize

Am I a neanderthal?


You get tripized by your spell checker maybe? It is trying to un-neanderthize you. Just disablize it, establize who is boss.
Ken
2

#1022 User is offline   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,408
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2016-April-29, 09:53

View PostPhil, on 2016-April-28, 22:08, said:

There is a set of words that I use but get tripped up by my spellchecker.

- Agendize
- Incentivize

Am I a neanderthal?
No, you're a Suit. Try installing the en-Manglement language pack - it will synergize your dynamic and orientate your vision. :-)
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#1023 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2016-May-16, 01:42

Replying to a survey with "oh yea? they asked only 1000 people out of millions! that's ridiculous!"

This is somehow even more annoying because it is a superficially very convincing argument and you can't dismiss it without explaining sampling theory and confidence intervals in detail. By the time I'm finished, the other party will have moved on to some other topic.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#1024 User is offline   shyams 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,655
  • Joined: 2009-August-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2016-May-16, 02:27

View Postgwnn, on 2016-May-16, 01:42, said:

Replying to a survey with "oh yea? they asked only 1000 people out of millions! that's ridiculous!"

This is somehow even more annoying because it is a superficially very convincing argument and you can't dismiss it without explaining sampling theory and confidence intervals in detail. By the time I'm finished, the other party will have moved on to some other topic.

Would you really attempt to explain to the other person in such a situation? I'm impressed by your patience and tolerance!
If I were in the situation, I'd simply brand the other person a duffer and move on.
0

#1025 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2016-May-16, 02:44

Yes. Well, at least normally I do so because I used to be one of those people - at least in the sense that I had the intuition that asking just 1000 people from a million can't be enough. In fact (not writing to you shyams in particular, just for people who might not realize this), if we ask 1000 out of 1M and got 50% of yeses, the confidence interval is somewhere between 47-53% or 46-54% at 95 or 99% level. The funny thing is that (essentially) the same confidence interval applies if the total population were 100M or any larger number {of course in real life larger populations will be more difficult to sample representatively}.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#1026 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,694
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2016-May-16, 04:49

The best way of explaining it to the public is to tell the story of George Gallup versus The Literary Digest for the 1936 Landon-Roosevelt election. The problem with poling is rarely sample size but rather constructing the sample to be representative of the entire population.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#1027 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2016-May-16, 08:48

View PostZelandakh, on 2016-May-16, 04:49, said:

The best way of explaining it to the public is to tell the story of George Gallup versus The Literary Digest for the 1936 Landon-Roosevelt election. The problem with poling is rarely sample size but rather constructing the sample to be representative of the entire population.

How does this story (which, as far as I can gather, is about random polling vs asking readers of a particular magazine) explain anything about apparently small but sufficient samples? Of course representativeness is important but I was talking about the misconception that one needs to ask a significant number of people (compared to the total population) before drawing conclusions about the general public.

edit: oh, the Literary Digest survey was based on 2.3 million (whoa) people while Gallup on 50,000. OK then I kind of understand what you mean, although I don't know if it's totally convincing to outsiders, since it covers why large samples aren't guaranteed to work in practice but not why very small samples could work in principle. Well, in any case, I know my way of explaining is completely unconvincing so I might try yours next time.

This post has been edited by gwnn: 2016-May-16, 08:53

... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#1028 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,694
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2016-May-16, 09:13

View Postgwnn, on 2016-May-16, 08:48, said:

edit: oh, the Literary Digest survey was based on 2.3 million (whoa) people while Gallup on 50,000.

Exactly, this was the turning point in polling methodology. Before Gallup it was assumed that more respondents meant a more accurate poll and a great deal of time and expense went into creating samples as large as possible. Afterwards it was realised that a small but well-constructed sample offered a much more accurate representation of the general population. It is simply a practical example illustrating what the maths says and shows in a simple way that the viewpoint of the "audience", despite being seemingly logical, is wrong.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#1029 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2016-May-17, 08:13

This reminds me of those silly polls on TV programs asking silly questions, getting 80%+ responses because people who vote are all sheeps watching and trusting the biased program.

People who lose money to vote on those polls is one of those things that makes me feel appart from humanity.
0

#1030 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2016-May-17, 09:19

View Postmycroft, on 2016-April-29, 09:53, said:

No, you're a Suit.


....feeling the burn :(
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#1031 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2016-May-28, 03:27

Pronouncing determine as deter+mine, which is the de facto standard at scientific conferences by non-natives. Before you say it, yes, I know it's petty and I mispronounce everything too. I also know that it would be more logical if pronunciation were additive like that!
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#1032 User is offline   kenberg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,212
  • Joined: 2004-September-22
  • Location:Northern Maryland

Posted 2016-May-28, 04:29

View Postgwnn, on 2016-May-28, 03:27, said:

Pronouncing determine as deter+mine, which is the de facto standard at scientific conferences by non-natives. Before you say it, yes, I know it's petty and I mispronounce everything too. I also know that it would be more logical if pronunciation were additive like that!


I was recently in Oregon and discovered that the last syllable is pronounced like gun rather than gone. I also discovered that Oregonians are quite insistent about this. See https://www.facebook...80546898870520/ among many other sites.

One of the newspapers addressed how the various presidential candidates pronounced, or mispronounced, the name of their state. Hillary did not much campaign there, so they described her pronunciation as ignoregon.

I am happy to pronounce it as the natives wish, as long as I do not have to agree that their choice is in any way the natural one.

I don't think I have ever heard someone pronounce determine so that it rhymes with deter swine. I just go to the wrong conferences.
Ken
1

#1033 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2016-May-28, 05:53

View PostFluffy, on 2016-May-17, 08:13, said:

This reminds me of those silly polls on TV programs asking silly questions, getting 80%+ responses because people who vote are all sheeps watching and trusting the biased program.

People who lose money to vote on those polls is one of those things that makes me feel appart from humanity.


These "polls" are lotteries, offering prizes. That is why people are charged for voting (I do not see how they can lose money actually, but they can spend it). What is not immediately obvious is how much money goes into the prize fund and how much to the organisers.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
0

#1034 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2016-May-28, 05:56

I have heard epi-tome and crew-dights from native speakers. And of course nearly everyone pronounces for-tay when they mean fort (forte, as in strength. It is French for strong, not Italian for loud).
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
0

#1035 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,570
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2016-May-28, 11:59

View Postkenberg, on 2016-May-28, 04:29, said:

I was recently in Oregon and discovered that the last syllable is pronounced like gun rather than gone. I also discovered that Oregonians are quite insistent about this. See https://www.facebook...80546898870520/ among many other sites.

One of the newspapers addressed how the various presidential candidates pronounced, or mispronounced, the name of their state. Hillary did not much campaign there, so they described her pronunciation as ignoregon.

I am happy to pronounce it as the natives wish, as long as I do not have to agree that their choice is in any way the natural one.

It wasn't until I had a friend in college from Missouri that I learned that they pronounce the last syllable as "ruh" rather than "ree".

But I'll also forgive them if they don't know how to pronounce Worcester. And only native Bostonians pronounce that city as Bahstahn instead of Bawstun -- I don't think any of them expect the rest of the country to adopt their accent.

But face it, spelling and pronunciation in English is a mess, because the language is such a melting pot of other languages.

#1036 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,570
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2016-May-28, 12:02

On The Daily Show this week (I think Thursday night's show) one of the correspondents was making fun of Trevor Noah (who is from South Africa, but I suspect most Americans would mistake his accent for British) for his pronunciation of "controversy" -- he says "con-TROV-er-sy" in stead of "CON-truh-ver-sy" like normal Americans.

#1037 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,194
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

Posted 2016-May-28, 12:50

Funny, I would say con-tro-VER-sy.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#1038 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,570
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2016-May-28, 20:37

View Posthelene_t, on 2016-May-28, 12:50, said:

Funny, I would say con-tro-VER-sy.

I just checked several online dictionaries, they agree with my pronunciation. The primary emphasis is on "con", the secondary emphasis is on "ver". But they also say that the British pronunciation emphasizes "tro".

The primary emphasis switches to "ver" when you say "controversial". Maybe that's what you're thinking of?

#1039 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2016-May-29, 02:11

Did you check the dictionary for Danish-German-Dutch accent in English? :P
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#1040 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,194
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

Posted 2016-May-31, 04:33

In Esperanto it is kon-tro-ver-SI-o I think.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

  • 57 Pages +
  • « First
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

15 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 15 guests, 0 anonymous users