vg|C 2017 Reisinger Semifinal 2,Round 2 of 9,B,4,6,Nickell,0,Bramley,0| rs|4HNx=,,5HEx=,,2SW+1,| pn|Weinstein,Woolsey,Levin,Bramley,South,West,North,East|pg|| qx|o4|st||md|2SQJ854HJT7DQT92C2,SA9762HKDA743C864,SKHQ986432DJCAJ95,ST3HA5DK865CKQT73|sv|b|mb|1S|mb|3H|an| |nt|ahollan1: duelling kingletons|pg|| mb|d|an| |mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sT|pc|s4|pc|sA|pc|sK|pg|| pc|s7|pc|dJ|pc|s3|pc|s8|pg|| nt|fabsayc: greedy return|pg|| nt|ahollan1: isn't play & defense in BAM supposed to be greedy?|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|hK|pc|h2|pc|h5|pg|| mc|10|pg|| qx|o5|st||md|3SAKQ53H3D73CQJ982,SHAKJ96DAQJ842C73,S976H84DK965CAK65,SJT842HQT752DTCT4|sv|n|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1S|mb|2S|an|Michaels|nt|ahollan1: i thought i would use general answer rather than double dummy analysis of 52 cards that we could see [compared to woolsey only seeing 26 plus 2 cards from trick 1]|pg|| mb|3H|an|support|nt|ahollan1: you bid our suit - i bid yours|pg|| mb|5H|nt|ahollan1: i wonder if 3@H is specifically 3-fit |pg|| nt|ahollan1: some use 2N to show 4+fit others use 2N as transfer to show @C so i can't be specific about 3@H|pg|| mb|p|an|forcing|nt|ahollan1: bid 'em - push 'em up - way up|pg|| mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|nt|fabsayc: i wonder if forcing passes make sense at BAM|pg|| mb|p|pc|sK|nt|ahollan1: i wonder how many pairs make system adjustments for the once-a-year BAM event|pg|| nt|ahollan1: unless they roll it into all matchpoint agreements|pg|| nt|fabsayc: not many, thats why i raised the point|pg|| nt|ahollan1: actually are the mid-week nationally rated team events in the fall also BAM?|pg|| nt|fabsayc: yes|pg|| pc|h6|pc|s6|pc|s2|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d5|pc|dT|pc|d7|pg|| pc|d2|pc|d6|pc|hT|pc|d3|pg|| pc|h2|pc|h3|pc|hA|pc|h4|pg|| pc|d4|pc|d9|pc|hQ|pc|c9|pg|| pc|h5|nt|warrens: making 6 easily|pg|| pc|s5|nt|fabsayc: only 5|pg|| mc|11|pg|| qx|o6|st||md|4SKQHK9854DJ83CQ42,ST6HAJ2DAQT42CAKT,S9832HQ6DK76CJ985,SAJ754HT73D95C763|sv|e|nt|warrens: sorry, 5. |pg|| nt|warrens: we'll see if he bet correctly|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: would 2nd round ruffing finesse in @D gain the overtrick?|pg|| mb|1C|an| |nt|ahollan1: 1@C = 16+unbal or 18+BAL|pg|| nt|fabsayc: yes|pg|| mb|p|mb|1D|an| |mb|1H|nt|ahollan1: 1@D = 0-8 [note not 0-7]|pg|| mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2H|an| |nt|ahollan1: 1N = 18-19|pg|| mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|hQ|nt|Vugraphzfc: bramley said 1nt 17 19|pg|| pc|h3|pc|h5|pc|h2|pg|| pc|h6|pc|h7|pc|h8|pc|hJ|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 3rd /4th seat 1N used to be 15-17|pg|| nt|ahollan1: looking at the list of open tables -- something went very wrong this round|pg|| nt|ahollan1: there is no "C" closed room, no "B" tables at all, some "A" tables still open from round 1 and then other problems|pg|| pc|s6|pc|s2|pc|sA|pc|sK|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d3|pc|dQ|pc|dK|pg|| pc|c8|pc|c3|pc|cQ|pc|cA|pg|| nt|ahollan1: unless there are vugraph operators for every table it is brutal coordinating vugraph in this event|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d7|pc|d9|pc|d8|pg|| pc|d4|pc|d6|pc|s4|pc|dJ|pg|| pc|s5|pc|sQ|pc|sT|pc|s3|pg|| pc|hK|pc|hA|nt|ahollan1: especially since acbl won't allow designated vugraph tables which require special notification for pairs to move there rather than follow the yellow brick road|pg|| mc|9|pg||