vg|41st WBTC-BBO5-BB,RR16,I,17,32,CHINA,0,ENGLAND,0| rs|4SE=,5SE-1,4HE=,4HE=,3NE=,4SW=,3CN+1,2HW-1,4HN=,4HN=,3DW=,3HNx-3,2HE+1,1NS=,2HEx-2,2DS=,2CS+1,3CN=,3NS-1,3NS-1,4SN=,4SS=,4HS-2,4SW-2,2SN-1,2SN-1,3NN=,3NN=,3NEx+2,3NE+1,2HN+1,4HN=| pn|SHI,ROBSON,JU,FORRESTER,GOLD,WANG,BAKHSHI,ZHANG|pg|| qx|o17|st||md|3SAQ9HK9542DQ974C9,S8743HAJ83DKT86CQ,STHT7DJ53CJT85432,SKJ652HQ6DA2CAK76|sv|o|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2C|an| |nt|iverson200: Hi all|pg|| mb|p|nt|iverson200: welcome to Round 16 of the bridge world teams championships|pg|| mb|2D|an| |nt|iverson200: between China and England|pg|| nt|iverson200: http://www.worldbridge.org/repository/tourn/bali.13/microsite/RunningScores/Asp/RoundTeamsConditStatClassicMod.asp?qtournid=980|pg|| mb|p|mb|2N|an| |mb|p|nt|iverson200: running score is here, China is ranked 8th, England 9th|pg|| mb|3S|mb|p|mb|4S|nt|iverson200: there are 21 rounds in the qualifying stage, 8 will qualify for the Knock Out stage|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|iverson200: so this is a crucial match for both teams|pg|| mb|p|pc|c9|pc|cQ|nt|iverson200: 1NT = 15-17 2@c is relay to 2@d, declarer shows 5c @s and maximum|pg|| pc|c5|pc|c6|pg|| pc|s3|pc|sT|pc|sJ|pc|sQ|pg|| pc|h2|pc|hJ|pc|h7|pc|h6|pg|| pc|s4|nt|iverson200: a @h here put declarer to test but he does not have too much choice other than taking the finesse|pg|| pc|c2|pc|s6|pc|s9|pg|| mc|10|nt|iverson200: so he will lose 3 trump tricks for = |pg|| pg|| qx|c17|st||md|3SAQ9HK9542DQ974C9,S8743HAJ83DKT86CQ,STHT7DJ53CJT85432,SKJ652HQ6DA2CAK76|sv|o|mb|p|mb|1C!|mb|1H|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|4D!|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|d|mb|r|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|4N!|mb|p|mb|5D!|mb|p|mb|5H!|mb|p|mb|5S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|h2|pc|h3|pc|h7|pc|hQ|pg|| pc|c6|pc|c9|pc|cQ|pc|c2|pg|| pc|s3|pc|sT|pc|sJ|pc|sQ|pg|| pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|d3|pc|d2|pg|| pc|s4|pc|c3|mc|10|pg|| qx|o18|st||md|4S542HAJ3D2CKJ8765,ST93HQ5DAK953CA92,SAJ876HT6DJ86CQ43,SKQHK98742DQT74CT|sv|n|nt|iverson200: E might open 2@h here|pg|| mb|2H|nt|iverson200: as they play it as 9-12, semi-constructive|pg|| nt|iverson200: with weaker hand he would open 2@d (3-8 in a major)|pg|| mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|d2|nt|iverson200: On 17, China went too high after a precision 1@c opening end up in 5@s but the unlucky trump layout makes it -1|pg|| nt|iverson200: so a good start for England by earning 10 imps|pg|| pc|dA|pc|dJ|pc|d7|pg|| nt|iverson200: S can either get 1 ruff and 1 trump or 2 trumps, so it is likely to be made|pg|| nt|iverson200: @d J signals entry in @s|pg|| pc|s3|pc|sA|pc|sQ|pc|s2|pg|| pc|d6|pc|dQ|pc|h3|pc|d3|pg|| pc|c8|pc|cA|nt|iverson200: declarer will go back to his hand and play a trump to Q|pg|| pc|c4|pc|cT|pg|| pc|s9|pc|s6|pc|sK|pc|s4|pg|| pc|h4|nt|iverson200: so 4@h can't be defeated|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|hQ|nt|granguru: Forrester politely waits for SHi to decide|pg|| pc|h6|pg|| pc|h5|pc|hT|mc|10|nt|granguru: and claioms|pg|| nt|granguru: claims*|pg|| nt|iverson200: Hi John|pg|| pg|| qx|c18|st||md|4S542HAJ3D2CKJ8765,ST93HQ5DAK953CA92,SAJ876HT6DJ86CQ43,SKQHK98742DQT74CT|sv|n|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|2D|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|3H|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|s2|pc|sT|pc|sA|pc|sQ|pg|| pc|c3|pc|cT|pc|cJ|pc|cA|pg|| pc|h5|pc|h6|pc|hK|pc|hA|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c2|pc|c4|pc|h2|pg|| pc|h4|pc|h3|pc|hQ|pc|hT|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d6|pc|d4|pc|d2|pg|| mc|10|pg|| qx|o19|st||md|1SQT96HQJT62DT5C65,SAKJ52H9D8642CQ73,S83HA54DQ73CKJT98,S74HK873DAKJ9CA42|sv|e|mb|2D|an| |nt|granguru: hi luo|pg|| nt|granguru: 3NT EW|pg|| nt|iverson200: 2@d = weak in both majors|pg|| nt|iverson200: at least 4-4 in NV|pg|| mb|p|mb|2H|mb|2N|mb|p|nt|iverson200: E is worried about @s, but he has to bid something|pg|| mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|iverson200: knowing opener has 4 card @s W just raises to 3nt without showing his @s suit|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|h9|pc|h4|pc|h3|pg|| nt|granguru: E will claim fast as there is only one line|pg|| pc|hT|nt|iverson200: declarer has 9 tricks because both @s and @d finesse work|pg|| nt|granguru: @HK @DA @S finesse @d finesse and claim|pg|| pc|d2|pc|hA|pc|h7|pg|| pc|h5|pc|hK|nt|granguru: S can give more time to the play throwing @D10 on @DA|pg|| pc|h2|nt|iverson200: right :) S is the danger hand now|pg|| nt|granguru: but even playing @DAK the can can be made|pg|| nt|iverson200: but a minor suit throw in would equally work|pg|| nt|dbl me: ...remembering that a specific sing. is a frequent as a specific doub.|pg|| pc|c3|pg|| pc|dA|nt|granguru: endplaying N |pg|| pc|d5|pc|d4|pc|d7|pg|| pc|s7|pc|s9|pc|sA|pc|s8|pg|| nt|granguru: now @D finesse is a forced play|pg|| pc|d6|pc|d3|pc|dJ|pc|dT|pg|| pc|dK|pc|c5|pc|d8|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|d9|pc|h6|pc|s2|pc|cT|pg|| nt|dbl me: Decl. guarded against sing. sQ, consistent w the bidding|pg|| pc|s4|pc|s6|pc|sJ|pc|s3|pg|| pc|sK|pc|c8|pc|h8|pc|sQ|pg|| pc|c7|pc|c9|pc|cA|pc|c6|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|c19|st||md|1SQT96HQJT62DT5C65,SAKJ52H9D8642CQ73,S83HA54DQ73CKJT98,S74HK873DAKJ9CA42|sv|e|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1C|mb|1D|mb|d|mb|1S|mb|d|mb|2N|mb|p|mb|3H!|mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|h4|pc|hK|pc|h2|pc|h9|pg|| pc|s4|pc|s6|pc|sJ|pc|s3|pg|| pc|d4|pc|d3|pc|dA|pc|d5|pg|| pc|s7|pc|s9|pc|sK|pc|s8|pg|| pc|sA|pc|cJ|pc|h3|pc|sT|pg|| pc|d2|pc|d7|pc|dJ|pc|dT|pg|| pc|dK|pc|sQ|pc|d6|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|c6|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pc|cA|pg|| mc|10|pg|| qx|o20|st||md|2SK976H53DK962CT63,S83HAQ762DJT74CJ9,SA5HKT94DQCKQ8542,SQJT42HJ8DA853CA7|sv|b|nt|iverson200: board 18 was a push|pg|| mb|p|nt|iverson200: Forrester have been declaring 3 consecutive hands, he must be very happy|pg|| mb|2C|an| |nt|granguru: nice 2@C Pre|pg|| mb|2S|nt|iverson200: 2@c = 11-15 6+@c or 5@c+4M|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|granguru: not so much as no euros involved :)|pg|| mb|d|mb|p|nt|granguru: informative X|pg|| mb|3C|nt|iverson200: N would not compromise this time as he reopens the bidding with a X, potentially showing @c + @h|pg|| nt|dbl me: Some would chanc a 3C call w the S hand, but farvfrom clear.|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sQ|nt|iverson200: yes, disciplined first pass, in case partner gets too excited|pg|| pc|s6|pc|s8|pc|sA|pg|| pc|dQ|pc|d5|nt|iverson200: 3@c is quite a good contract|pg|| pc|d2|pc|d7|pg|| pc|s5|pc|sT|pc|sK|pc|s3|pg|| nt|dbl me: The X by N was risky unless it is systemically understood as not bringing d's into the picture.|pg|| pc|h3|pc|hA|pc|h4|pc|h8|pg|| nt|iverson200: the hand plays out itself from now, so likely +1 or +2|pg|| pc|cJ|pc|cK|pc|cA|pc|c3|pg|| pc|c7|nt|iverson200: kibitzers point out on previous board a @c switch at trick 2 would give declarer some trouble in collecting 9 tricks in 3NT|pg|| pc|cT|pc|c9|pc|c2|pg|| nt|iverson200: certainly true, but very hard to find the defence|pg|| pc|h5|pc|h7|pc|hK|pc|hJ|pg|| mc|10|nt|iverson200: esp. after partner encourages @h|pg|| pg|| qx|c20|st||md|2SK976H53DK962CT63,S83HAQ762DJT74CJ9,SA5HKT94DQCKQ8542,SQJT42HJ8DA853CA7|sv|b|mb|p|mb|1C|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|cK|pc|cA|pc|cT|pc|c9|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|h3|pc|h2|pc|h4|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s7|pc|s8|pc|sA|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|c7|pc|c3|pc|cJ|pg|| pc|dQ|pc|dA|pc|d2|pc|d4|pg|| pc|h8|pc|h5|pc|hA|pc|h9|pg|| pc|dT|pc|s5|pc|d3|pc|dK|pg|| pc|c6|pc|h6|pc|c4|pc|s2|pg|| pc|s3|pc|c2|pc|sJ|pc|sK|pg|| pc|s6|pc|d7|pc|hT|pc|s4|pg|| mc|7|pg|| qx|o21|st||md|3SAQ8HK653DA5CJT97,SJ7653HJDKQ72C864,STHAQT982DJ986CQ5,SK942H74DT43CAK32|sv|n|nt|granguru: declarer should have taken @HK at once|pg|| mb|2H|mb|p|nt|dbl me: however, decl. noted the encouragement ass well|pg|| nt|dbl me: as|pg|| nt|granguru: rite|pg|| mb|2N|an| |nt|granguru: a good reason to duck|pg|| nt|granguru: easy 4@H NS|pg|| nt|iverson200: 2@h = weak, 2nt= relay|pg|| mb|3D|nt|granguru: s passing by 2NT to show strengh and support|pg|| nt|iverson200: 3@d = minimum in this vul, good suit, i think N makes the 3@d bid|pg|| nt|dbl me: W wants a d lead, but has a place to go if opps have no trouble doubling|pg|| mb|p|nt|iverson200: well it is W who makes the bid?|pg|| nt|vugraphzcz: yes|pg|| nt|iverson200: an interesting lead directing overcall at 3 level|pg|| mb|p|nt|iverson200: semi-psych to disrupt opponents' bidding|pg|| nt|granguru: stopping 3NT just in case at the same time...|pg|| nt|dbl me: Unfortunately, that bid basically prevents a gainful 4S sac.|pg|| nt|granguru: 4@H will be nevertheless reached |pg|| nt|granguru: even more with @DAx|pg|| nt|dbl me: (unfortunately only from EW's viewpoint) :-)|pg|| nt|granguru: S looking for the losers he is covering|pg|| nt|iverson200: 4@s is good sac but few would find their @s fit, I expected bidding would reach 4 level in 2 bids at some other tables|pg|| nt|iverson200: by passing 3@d, N has shown a non-max hand, otherwise he would bid 3@h|pg|| mb|4H|mb|p|nt|granguru: N must have just a few @D for W bidding ..and then more @C |pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|granguru: but vul vs not 4@H is almost automatic|pg|| nt|iverson200: S would go anyways|pg|| nt|iverson200: yes|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c7|pc|c8|pc|c5|pg|| pc|d3|nt|granguru: xie xie says Ju to SHi|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d2|pc|d6|pg|| pc|h3|pc|hJ|pc|hA|pc|h4|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|h7|pc|h5|pc|c6|pg|| nt|granguru: xie xie means Thank you in cantonese|pg|| pc|cQ|nt|dbl me: Ironically, W is too weak to bid 3S, but feels it is ok to bid a 4-card suit at the same level ;-)|pg|| mc|10|nt|granguru: chinese|pg|| pg|| qx|c21|st||md|3SAQ8HK653DA5CJT97,SJ7653HJDKQ72C864,STHAQT982DJ986CQ5,SK942H74DT43CAK32|sv|n|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|cA|pc|c7|pc|c4|pc|c5|pg|| pc|d3|pc|dA|pc|d7|pc|d6|pg|| pc|h3|pc|hJ|pc|hA|pc|h4|pg|| pc|hT|pc|h7|pc|h5|pc|c8|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|cK|pc|c9|pc|c6|pg|| pc|d4|pc|d5|pc|dQ|pc|d8|pg|| mc|10|pg|| qx|o22|st||md|4SJ9HT4DJ432CQJT54,SA43HDAKQ97CAK983,SKQT2HAK8652DT5C7,S8765HQJ973D86C62|sv|e|mb|p|nt|iverson200: Passing 3@d might show a maximum hand on previous board while 3@h on his own shows minimum, we don't know what their agreement is, but i think S would go to 4@h no matter what|pg|| mb|p|mb|1D|nt|dbl me: Here W has a tough hand to describe|pg|| mb|1H|mb|p|mb|p|nt|iverson200: 1@d shows 5+@d in their system|pg|| nt|granguru: S is SHI-ZHENG-JUN, not SHI-HAO-JUN|pg|| mb|3C|nt|iverson200: E/W plays 5card @d/@h/@s openings|pg|| mb|d|mb|3D|nt|dbl me: W intends to double h's at any level next time|pg|| mb|p|nt|granguru: playing in @d is obviously better than @C as the cards lie|pg|| nt|iverson200: a big misfit hand, now W needs to shut down|pg|| nt|dbl me: 3S anyone?|pg|| nt|iverson200: he feels he has not fully shown his strength yet, 3@c can be on a 16 count|pg|| nt|iverson200: but does his hand warrant another bid, given E passes first round of bidding|pg|| nt|dbl me: He must try once more with a 3- loser hand|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|granguru: great pass|pg|| nt|dbl me: excellent discipline|pg|| nt|iverson200: he passes! an amazing decision looking at 4 hands|pg|| pc|hA|nt|granguru: the jump vul vs not indicates already around 9 tricks|pg|| pc|h3|pc|hT|nt|dbl me: He may have taken N's x more seriously than N himself! ;-)|pg|| pc|d7|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c7|pc|c2|pc|c4|pg|| nt|iverson200: yes, great pass, forseeing possible huge misfit|pg|| nt|granguru: will go1 or 2 down|pg|| nt|granguru: but surely winning points|pg|| nt|granguru: must play a small @C|pg|| pc|c3|nt|cak1: other table are in 3hx last board|pg|| nt|granguru: to ruff a @C loser later|pg|| nt|granguru: another great play |pg|| pc|h8|pc|c6|pc|cT|pg|| nt|granguru: Robson on his best!|pg|| pc|d2|pc|dA|pc|d5|pc|d6|pg|| pc|c8|pc|dT|pc|h7|pc|c5|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s5|pc|s9|pc|sA|pg|| pc|c9|pc|h2|pc|d8|pc|cJ|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|h4|pc|d9|nt|granguru: Robson wins now the hand|pg|| pc|h5|pg|| nt|iverson200: so China would gain some imps here if England went overboard to 3@h X,despite very good play from declarer|pg|| nt|brgpro: i see this is the key match, basically these 2 teams are fighting for the 8th spot for the play off|pg|| nt|iverson200: right, Jack|pg|| mc|9|nt|dbl me: N was made to regret his earlier x of 3C...after a pass instead, this hand wd not be so clearcut to declare.|pg|| pg|| qx|c22|st||md|4SJ9HT4DJ432CQJT54,SA43HDAKQ97CAK983,SKQT2HAK8652DT5C7,S8765HQJ973D86C62|sv|e|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1C!|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|2D|mb|2S|mb|p|nt|dburn: strong club opening likely to enable East-West to stay low|pg|| nt|dburn: will not be so easy at the other table|pg|| mb|3H|mb|d|mb|p|nt|dburn: however, North-South also found it hard to stay low|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|dburn: and this will not play well|pg|| pc|d8|pc|d2|pc|dQ|pc|d5|pg|| pc|dK|pc|dT|pc|d6|pc|d3|pg|| pc|dA|pc|c7|pc|c6|pc|d4|pg|| pc|d9|pc|s2|pc|h3|pc|dJ|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|h4|pc|c3|pc|hK|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s8|pc|s9|pc|sA|pg|| pc|cA|pc|h2|pc|c2|pc|c4|pg|| pc|sT|pc|s5|pc|sJ|pc|s3|pg|| pc|c5|pc|c8|pc|h5|pc|h7|pg|| pc|s6|pc|cT|pc|s4|pc|sQ|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h9|pc|hT|pc|c9|pg|| pc|h6|pc|hJ|pc|cJ|pc|d7|pg|| pc|s7|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pc|h8|pg|| pg|| qx|o23|st||md|1SK92HKJ9DA53CKT65,SAQ83H6432DKQT9C4,S764HA85DJ874CJ82,SJT5HQT7D62CAQ973|sv|b|mb|1N|nt|granguru: Not so clear ..Japan must play against nr 1-2-3-4-6 and he is number 5..so very easy Japan could go out|pg|| mb|d|an| |mb|p|nt|iverson200: X = majors|pg|| mb|2C|an| |nt|iverson200: 1NT = 14-16|pg|| nt|brgpro: is X majors?|pg|| nt|brgpro: i doubt...|pg|| mb|p|mb|2D|an| |nt|granguru: what convention is it?|pg|| mb|p|nt|brgpro: can also be @s plus another|pg|| nt|iverson200: yes, on their cc at least|pg|| mb|2H|nt|brgpro: Lionel, |pg|| mb|p|nt|granguru: kind of modified Astro?|pg|| nt|brgpro: no|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|brgpro: X=@s plus another|pg|| nt|brgpro: 2m=this minor +@h|pg|| nt|brgpro: 2M=nat|pg|| pc|c6|pc|c4|pc|cJ|pc|cQ|pg|| nt|brgpro: this way, u can always bring ur 4 card M into the picture|pg|| pc|sJ|pc|sK|pc|sA|pc|s4|pg|| pc|h2|pc|h5|pc|hT|pc|hJ|pg|| nt|dbl me: Kib's, don't get the impression that all experts wd ebter the auction with the W hand...Andrew is aggressive after opps open the bidding.|pg|| pc|cK|nt|dbl me: enter|pg|| pc|h3|pc|c8|pc|c3|pg|| nt|granguru: So it is just a variation of Meckwell convention |pg|| pc|s3|pc|s6|pc|sT|pc|s2|pg|| pc|c7|pc|c5|pc|h4|pc|c2|pg|| pc|h6|pc|h8|pc|h7|pc|h9|pg|| pc|s9|pc|sQ|pc|s7|pc|s5|pg|| nt|iverson200: China gained 9 imps on previous board, defending 3@h X so they have overtaken England 11:10|pg|| pc|dK|pc|d7|pc|d6|pc|d3|pg|| pc|s8|pc|d4|pc|d2|pc|hK|pg|| nt|dbl me: S is now end-played.|pg|| mc|9|nt|iverson200: great play in the 4-3 fit|pg|| pg|| qx|c23|st||md|1SK92HKJ9DA53CKT65,SAQ83H6432DKQT9C4,S764HA85DJ874CJ82,SJT5HQT7D62CAQ973|sv|b|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|dK|pc|d4|pc|d2|pc|dA|pg|| pc|d5|pc|dT|pc|dJ|pc|d6|pg|| pc|c2|pc|c7|pc|cT|pc|c4|pg|| pc|d3|pc|d9|pc|d7|pc|c3|pg|| pc|h6|pc|hA|pc|h7|pc|h9|pg|| pc|c8|pc|cA|pc|c5|pc|s3|pg|| nt|dburn: strange discard, that - not in accordance with the fundamental principle "throw losers and keep winners"|pg|| nt|dburn: still, East can play @cQ and the defence can survive, but this is unnecessary pressure|pg|| pc|sJ|pc|s2|pc|s8|pc|s4|pg|| pc|sT|pc|sK|pc|sA|pc|s6|pg|| pc|h2|pc|h5|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|h3|pc|h8|pc|hT|pg|| pc|cK|pc|h4|pc|cJ|pc|c9|pg|| mc|7|pg|| qx|o24|st||md|2SKQ974HA54DKQ965C,SAT8HT6DAJ7CQT754,S62HQ87DT82CAJ963,SJ53HKJ932D43CK82|sv|o|nt|dbl me: If you play them like AR, you can bid like AR :-)|pg|| mb|1C|an| |mb|p|mb|1D|an| |nt|iverson200: 1@c = 1+ as their 1@d promises 5card @d|pg|| mb|1S|mb|p|nt|iverson200: 1@d = @hs|pg|| mb|p|mb|1N|mb|2D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|2H|nt|dbl me: E will not sell out, as a 1C opener raely has more than 3 d's|pg|| mb|d|mb|p|nt|dbl me: rarely|pg|| nt|dbl me: (though that's more poss. in their sys)|pg|| nt|dbl me: Now N's decision is far from a breeze|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|pc|sK|nt|iverson200: Double shows points, optional, winning to compete|pg|| nt|iverson200: and Shi plans to convert partner's 3@c to 3@d|pg|| nt|dbl me: The crossruff is coming...|pg|| nt|brgpro: but can we see 6 tricks for defence?|pg|| nt|iverson200: N's pass of 2@h X came a bit surprised to me as I would need a better hand to pass 2@h X|pg|| nt|brgpro: @hA, plus 2 ruffs...and 1@s 1@d and 1@c...|pg|| nt|brgpro: mybe|pg|| nt|dbl me: Yes, E cd certainly have 6 h's, but the tempo may have convinced him otherwise|pg|| nt|dbl me: (him= N)|pg|| nt|brgpro: it is not difficult for N to realize S has less than 1@c|pg|| pc|s8|pc|s6|pc|s3|pg|| pc|s7|pc|sT|pc|s2|pc|sJ|pg|| nt|dbl me: the cA|pg|| nt|brgpro: so but once he gives the @c ruff, can they still manage the @d trick?|pg|| pc|d4|pc|dK|nt|dbl me: ...only if he retains the cA|pg|| nt|brgpro: that wont be easy...|pg|| nt|brgpro: but now declarer gives the @d trick away|pg|| nt|iverson200: well now declarer plays itself|pg|| nt|dbl me: However, d's have already been led|pg|| nt|dbl me: I don't blame declarer for thinking N has more than 3 h's|pg|| nt|iverson200: board 23, England made 1NT in the other room, Robson's agreesive overcall over 1NT has paid off and they gained 6imps|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d2|pg|| pc|hT|pc|hQ|nt|dbl me: Now a very low sp. by S...|pg|| pc|h2|pc|h4|pg|| nt|dbl me: hehe. it won't come to that...|pg|| nt|brgpro: Am i missing something...|pg|| nt|dbl me: That was a deep position, not covering the hQ|pg|| nt|iverson200: E reads S as @h A/ @h Ax, on the ground that N would play A with AQ87|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c2|pc|d6|pc|c4|pg|| nt|dbl me: Why bother using dummy's d entry to play trumps this way?|pg|| pc|c9|pc|c8|pc|h5|pc|c5|pg|| pc|s4|pc|sA|pc|h7|pc|s5|pg|| nt|brgpro: but how can S have @cA?|pg|| pc|c3|pc|cK|pc|hA|pc|c7|pg|| nt|brgpro: did N pass the X with nothing?|pg|| nt|dbl me: I think Tony may have second-guessed himself here...|pg|| mc|6|nt|iverson200: right, the @h duck is questionable|pg|| nt|iverson200: one more undertrick|pg|| nt|dbl me: But again, I wd have taken casino odds that N had more than 3 trumps...|pg|| pg|| qx|c24|st||md|2SKQ974HA54DKQ965C,SAT8HT6DAJ7CQT754,S62HQ87DT82CAJ963,SJ53HKJ932D43CK82|sv|o|mb|1D|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|2D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|hT|pc|h7|pc|h2|pc|h4|pg|| pc|h6|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pc|hA|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s8|pc|s2|pc|s3|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|sA|pc|s6|pc|s5|pg|| pc|c4|pc|cA|pc|c2|pc|h5|pg|| pc|c3|pc|c8|pc|d5|pc|c5|pg|| pc|s4|pc|sT|pc|d8|pc|sJ|pg|| pc|c6|pc|cK|pc|d6|pc|c7|pg|| pc|s7|pc|cT|pc|dT|pc|h3|pg|| pc|d2|pc|d3|pc|dK|pc|d7|pg|| pc|s9|pc|cQ|pc|c9|pc|d4|pg|| pc|h9|pc|d9|pc|dJ|pc|h8|pg|| pc|dA|pc|cJ|pc|hJ|pc|dQ|pg|| pg|| qx|o25|st||md|3S72HJDKT62CKQ8752,SJT95HQT975D975C9,SQ864HAK863DA4C63,SAK3H42DQJ83CAJT4|sv|e|nt|iverson200: http://www.worldbridge.org/repository/tourn/bali.13/microsite/RunningScores/Asp/RoundTeamsConditStatClassicMod.asp?qtournid=980 running score|pg|| nt|brgpro: still shd have covered the @hQ...he was playing S to have sing. @hA...|pg|| nt|dbl me: agree...N's pass was too slow.|pg|| mb|1H|nt|iverson200: yes, he second guessed himself seeing N's @h Q|pg|| mb|d|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sJ|nt|iverson200: a tied match now|pg|| pc|s4|nt|dbl me: These days, less than 50% of champ pairs play 2C as nat. over the X :-)|pg|| nt|brgpro: will probably make 3, coffee hand|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s2|pg|| pc|c9|pc|c3|pc|cA|pc|c2|pg|| pc|cJ|pc|cK|pc|s5|pc|c6|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pc|h4|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h2|pc|s7|nt|iverson200: will score all trumps and top tricks|pg|| pc|h5|pg|| mc|9|nt|vugraphzcz: paused now, director on the table for board 24|pg|| nt|iverson200: maybe some discrepancies during explanation of bids|pg|| nt|brgpro: i dont think there will be any adjustments...|pg|| nt|iverson200: it is somewhat unusual to call the director after next board is over :)|pg|| pg|| qx|c25|st||md|3S72HJDKT62CKQ8752,SJT95HQT975D975C9,SQ864HAK863DA4C63,SAK3H42DQJ83CAJT4|sv|e|mb|1H|mb|d|mb|1N!|mb|p|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|2N!|mb|p|mb|3C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|sJ|pc|s6|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s7|pc|s5|pc|s4|pg|| pc|d3|pc|d2|pc|d9|pc|dA|pg|| pc|c3|pc|c4|pc|cK|pc|c9|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|hQ|pc|hA|pc|h2|pg|| pc|hK|pc|h4|pc|d6|pc|h5|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s3|pc|dT|pc|s9|pg|| pc|c6|pc|cT|pc|cQ|pc|d5|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|o26|st||md|4SA85HK42D876CAJ75,SKQJ62H6DKJT42C92,ST74HAQ95DA9CQ864,S93HJT873DQ53CKT3|sv|b|mb|p|nt|brgpro: he can always call director |pg|| mb|1D|an| |nt|brgpro: maybe he didnt realize it after the hand but later in the match|pg|| mb|2S|nt|brgpro: that is OK accroing to the rules|pg|| nt|iverson200: of course. :) |pg|| mb|d|mb|p|mb|2N|mb|p|nt|dbl me: NS need to stop at 3C|pg|| nt|iverson200: 1@d = 1+, 11-15|pg|| mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|iverson200: 2NT = probabl is 11-13 bal|pg|| pc|sK|nt|dbl me: Every reason to lead d's here...|pg|| pc|s4|pc|s9|pc|sA|pg|| pc|h4|pc|h6|nt|iverson200: well, you can't blame him for leading from KQJ :)|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|h8|pg|| pc|c4|pc|c3|pc|cJ|pc|c2|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c9|pc|c6|pc|cT|pg|| pc|c5|pc|d2|pc|c8|pc|cK|pg|| nt|dbl me: S gambled a lot on the assumption that W had more than 5 sp's|pg|| nt|iverson200: well, his 2@s is unusual with 5-5|pg|| pc|d3|pc|d6|pc|dT|pc|dA|pg|| pc|cQ|nt|iverson200: not enough tricks, needed to pick up @cs |pg|| nt|dbl me: indeed, but a sp duck wd prob. have induced a 2nd sp|pg|| pc|h7|pc|c7|nt|iverson200: yes, but still not enough tricks as @h break is bad|pg|| nt|dbl me: Anyone know why E did not return a sp?|pg|| pc|d4|pg|| pc|h5|pc|hT|pc|hK|pc|s6|pg|| pc|h2|nt|iverson200: W feels some pressure as he reads declarer has 4card @s and may have @d Q, but he will be all right to end play declarer|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|hA|pc|h3|pg|| mc|8|nt|iverson200: now he realizes partner may have another @s but chose to return @d|pg|| pg|| qx|c26|st||md|4SA85HK42D876CAJ75,SKQJ62H6DKJT42C92,ST74HAQ95DA9CQ864,S93HJT873DQ53CKT3|sv|b|mb|p|mb|1C|mb|1S|mb|d|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sK|pc|s4|pc|s9|pc|s5|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s7|pc|s3|pc|sA|pg|| pc|h4|pc|h6|pc|hQ|pc|h3|pg|| pc|c4|pc|c3|pc|cJ|pc|c2|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c9|pc|c6|pc|cT|pg|| pc|c7|pc|dT|pc|c8|pc|cK|pg|| nt|dburn: would have thought it more normal to discard the jack|pg|| pc|dQ|pc|d6|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg|| nt|dburn: but maybe they play a different method|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|d3|pc|c5|pc|d2|pg|| mc|8|pg|| qx|o27|st||md|1SAQHK9865D98CA542,S53HAQJDKJ643C876,SKJ97642HT4DA52C3,ST8H732DQT7CKQJT9|sv|o|nt|dbl me: W seemed to play E for his actual sp holding !|pg|| mb|1H|mb|p|nt|brgpro: an "easy" 4@s here i assume|pg|| mb|1S|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|nt|dbl me: 5C wd save a few imps|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|pc|cK|nt|brgpro: nobody is going to lead a trump with the E hand|pg|| nt|dbl me: (or d)|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c6|pc|c3|pg|| pc|d8|nt|brgpro: KQJ109 of a suit and 10x trump|pg|| pc|d3|pc|d2|pc|dT|pg|| pc|s8|pc|sA|pc|s5|pc|s2|pg|| pc|d9|pc|d4|pc|dA|pc|d7|pg|| pc|d5|pc|dQ|pc|sQ|pc|dK|pg|| mc|10|nt|iverson200: yes trump lead beats it as declarer has not enough entries to set up @hs OR get a @d ruff|pg|| nt|brgpro: only when u look at 52 cards...u will lead a trump...|pg|| nt|brgpro: but dummy is the 1NT bidder|pg|| pg|| qx|c27|st||md|1SAQHK9865D98CA542,S53HAQJDKJ643C876,SKJ97642HT4DA52C3,ST8H732DQT7CKQJT9|sv|o|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|4D!|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|c6|pc|c3|pc|cT|pc|cA|pg|| pc|d8|pc|d3|pc|dA|pc|d7|pg|| pc|d2|pc|dT|pc|d9|pc|d6|pg|| pc|h2|pc|hK|pc|hA|pc|h4|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|hT|pc|h3|pc|h5|pg|| pc|dK|pc|d5|pc|dQ|mc|10|pg|| qx|o28|st||md|2S2HAKQT75DQJ73CQJ,SQJ8653H83DK52CAT,SKT7H4D864CK87652,SA94HJ962DAT9C943|sv|n|nt|iverson200: dummy does not have enough entries*|pg|| nt|brgpro: if he has any short suit it is supposed to be @s!|pg|| mb|2S|an| |mb|p|mb|3S|nt|brgpro: besides, E has 3 small @h, of course he doesnt want the @c losers to go away before the @hs are established|pg|| mb|4H|mb|p|nt|iverson200: 2@s = 9-12|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|pc|sQ|pc|s7|pc|s9|pc|s2|pg|| nt|brgpro: @s9=@d|pg|| nt|iverson200: yes, as both attitude and count are clearly known from the bidding and play, the card will have a suit preference undertone|pg|| pc|sJ|pc|sK|pc|sA|pc|h5|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h8|pc|h4|pc|h6|pg|| pc|hK|pc|h3|pc|d4|pc|h2|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|s3|pc|c2|pc|h9|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|cA|pc|c5|pc|c3|pg|| pc|d2|pc|d6|pc|dA|pc|d3|pg|| pc|dT|pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|d8|pg|| nt|iverson200: -2|pg|| nt|brgpro: at the other table will be 1@s opening...2@s raise, so S will bid 3@h only|pg|| mc|8|nt|brgpro: dont know if W compete 3@s or not but likely either 3@h or 3@s|pg|| pg|| qx|c28|st||md|2S2HAKQT75DQJ73CQJ,SQJ8653H83DK52CAT,SKT7H4D864CK87652,SA94HJ962DAT9C943|sv|n|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|4H|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|h4|pc|h2|pc|hT|pc|h8|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h3|pc|d8|pc|h6|pg|| pc|hK|pc|cT|pc|c8|pc|h9|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|sQ|pc|d4|pc|hJ|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c2|pc|c3|pc|cJ|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s7|pc|s9|pc|s2|pg|| pc|c4|pc|cQ|pc|s5|pc|c5|pg|| pc|s6|pc|sT|pc|sA|pc|d3|pg|| pc|c9|pc|h5|pc|sJ|pc|c6|pg|| pc|d2|pc|d6|pc|dA|pc|d7|pg|| pc|d9|pc|dJ|mc|8|pg|| qx|o29|st||md|3SQ64HQJ75DAQJCQ62,ST73HAK942DK3CK97,SAJ985H3DT976CJ85,SK2HT86D8542CAT43|sv|b|mb|p|nt|iverson200: so 4@h - 2 will likely to lose a few imps|pg|| mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|p|nt|brgpro: i was told it is 4@s!! in the other room...was it doubled?|pg|| nt|iverson200: bd 27, 4@s in the other room, declarer was S, W did not find the @s lead either, for a push|pg|| mb|p|pc|d4|nt|brgpro: NS play 2 way stayman after 1NT|pg|| nt|brgpro: hence both 2M bids are nat and sign off|pg|| nt|dbl me: Here, 8 tricks are unassailable.|pg|| pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|d6|pg|| pc|d3|nt|iverson200: may have a @d ruff|pg|| pc|d7|pc|d2|nt|brgpro: after 1@d lead, EW will find their ruff |pg|| pc|dJ|pg|| nt|brgpro: -1|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s7|pc|s5|nt|iverson200: 4@s not doubled on board 28, but England will still gain 7 imps|pg|| pc|sK|pg|| nt|brgpro: disadvantage for not playing transfers|pg|| pc|d5|pc|dA|pc|sT|pc|d9|pg|| pc|hK|pc|h3|pc|h6|pc|h5|pg|| pc|s3|pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|s4|pg|| nt|brgpro: have to claim -1|pg|| pc|dT|pc|d8|pc|c2|mc|7|pg|| qx|c29|st||md|3SQ64HQJ75DAQJCQ62,ST73HAK942DK3CK97,SAJ985H3DT976CJ85,SK2HT86D8542CAT43|sv|b|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1C|mb|1H|mb|d|mb|2H|mb|d!|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|h6|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pc|h3|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s8|pc|sK|pc|s4|pg|| pc|hT|pc|h5|pc|h4|pc|s5|pg|| pc|d7|pc|d5|pc|dJ|pc|dK|pg|| pc|d3|pc|d6|pc|d4|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s7|pc|s9|pc|s2|pg|| pc|s6|pc|sT|pc|sA|pc|c4|pg|| pc|d9|pc|d2|pc|dA|pc|c9|pg|| pc|c2|pc|c7|pc|c8|pc|cT|pg|| pc|h8|pc|hJ|pc|hA|pc|sJ|pg|| pc|dT|pc|d8|pc|h7|pc|h2|pg|| pc|c5|pc|c3|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pg|| pc|h9|pc|cJ|pc|cA|pc|c6|pg|| pg|| qx|o30|st||md|4SK642HAQ2DK75C642,S975HJT4DACAT9853,SAQ8HK93D9643CKJ7,SJT3H8765DQJT82CQ|sv|o|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|2C|nt|iverson200: running scores http://www.worldbridge.org/repository/tourn/bali.13/microsite/RunningScores/Asp/RoundTeamsConditStatClassicMod.asp?qtournid=980|pg|| mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|brgpro: it looks to me...the English team have switched their partnerships, I dont know if it is allowed in this event unless you play standard systems. because all convention cards must ...|pg|| nt|brgpro: be posted 2-3 months in advance|pg|| pc|dQ|nt|brgpro: unless the summited the convention cards at that time|pg|| pc|d5|pc|dA|nt|brgpro: they|pg|| nt|iverson200: yes it looks like a 3-man rotation|pg|| pc|d3|pg|| nt|brgpro: ok|pg|| pc|hJ|nt|brgpro: but Forrester played with Gold|pg|| pc|h3|pc|h8|pc|hQ|pg|| pc|c2|pc|c8|pc|cJ|pc|cQ|pg|| pc|dT|pc|dK|pc|c3|pc|d4|pg|| pc|c4|pc|cA|pc|c7|pc|d2|pg|| nt|dbl me: 9 tricks now|pg|| nt|iverson200: well, ya, not exactly 3 man, they have 5 partnerships, I just saw|pg|| nt|iverson200: yes, no choice but to test @s 3-3 now|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|c30|st||md|4SK642HAQ2DK75C642,S975HJT4DACAT9853,SAQ8HK93D9643CKJ7,SJT3H8765DQJT82CQ|sv|o|mb|p|mb|1C|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|2D!|mb|p|mb|2S!|mb|p|mb|2N|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|h8|pc|h2|pc|hJ|pc|hK|pg|| pc|d4|pc|d2|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c7|pc|cQ|pc|c2|pg|| pc|c5|pc|cK|pc|h5|pc|c4|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s3|pc|s2|pc|s5|pg|| pc|sA|pc|sT|pc|s4|pc|s7|pg|| pc|s8|pc|sJ|pc|sK|pc|s9|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|o31|st||md|1SA8432HKQ764DTC97,S5HAJT2DA93CJT862,SK96H85DQ865CA543,SQJT7H93DKJ742CKQ|sv|n|mb|2D|an| |mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|nt|iverson200: or E with 4+@s + @d, a squeeze without count. but the @s is 3-3 so declarer collected 9 tricks|pg|| mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|nt|iverson200: 2@d = weak in majors, 5-5 in this vul|pg|| mb|p|nt|brgpro: not sure NS can beat this|pg|| pc|c9|nt|brgpro: although EW has only22 combined points|pg|| pc|c2|nt|brgpro: btidge is a game of tricks...|pg|| nt|dbl me: 5 tricks not even available|pg|| nt|iverson200: N gives S credit for his opening in this vul, X is certainly reasonable|pg|| nt|brgpro: not a game of points...|pg|| nt|iverson200: but the layout of cards is unfavorable to N/S here |pg|| pc|cA|pc|cQ|pg|| pc|s6|pc|sJ|nt|brgpro: it is just a cold contract...|pg|| nt|iverson200: S may read the X as an unusual lead|pg|| nt|dbl me: The opening lead sped up the play considerably|pg|| nt|brgpro: EW can even pick up 5 tricks in @d...|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s5|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c7|pc|c6|pc|c5|pg|| nt|brgpro: now the opening bid and lead tell E everything|pg|| nt|iverson200: so a duck would be fatal here |pg|| pc|d4|pc|dT|nt|dbl me: Now the sp suit is blocked as well|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d6|pg|| pc|d9|pc|d5|pc|d2|pc|h6|pg|| nt|iverson200: 11 tricks|pg|| nt|brgpro: 11 tricks|pg|| mc|11|pg|| qx|c31|st||md|1SA8432HKQ764DTC97,S5HAJT2DA93CJT862,SK96H85DQ865CA543,SQJT7H93DKJ742CKQ|sv|n|mb|p|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|2D!|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|h6|pc|h2|pc|h8|pc|h9|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c7|pc|c2|pc|c3|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|c9|pc|c6|pc|c4|pg|| pc|h3|pc|hQ|pc|hA|pc|h5|pg|| pc|cJ|pc|cA|pc|d2|pc|h7|pg|| pc|s9|pc|sJ|pc|sA|pc|s5|pg|| pc|s3|pc|d3|pc|sK|pc|s7|pg|| pc|s6|pc|sQ|mc|10|pg|| qx|o32|st||md|2SKJ4HATDJ76543C64,S63H6543DA92CK852,SAQT9HKQJ72DQCJT7,S8752H98DKT8CAQ93|sv|e|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|nt|iverson200: bd 29, China defended well in 2@s too for a push|pg|| nt|dbl me: 4H is pretty sweet for NS|pg|| mb|2C|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|nt|brgpro: no...|pg|| nt|dbl me: Tkaes trump leads to beat.|pg|| nt|brgpro: even EW can switch to a trump|pg|| nt|dbl me: Takes|pg|| nt|brgpro: even a @s lead|pg|| nt|brgpro: just need a trump switch|pg|| nt|brgpro: well in time|pg|| nt|dbl me: E will lead a trump with that club holding if they end in h's|pg|| nt|brgpro: 3@h is the limit|pg|| nt|iverson200: 1@h 11-15, 1NT is nonF 7-12|pg|| nt|dbl me: yup|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|pc|s5|nt|iverson200: trusting his partner to do more than 2@h with 11+ , N decides to pass, which is the winning decision|pg|| pc|s4|pc|s6|pc|s9|pg|| pc|h2|nt|dbl me: Yes, sing. Q is unexciting|pg|| pc|h8|pc|hA|pc|h5|pg|| nt|iverson200: just 9 tricks|pg|| pc|hT|pc|h4|pc|hK|pc|h9|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|s2|pc|d3|pc|h3|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|s7|nt|brgpro: with @dQ in @c, the way i know about N...he would have opened a str. 1@c|pg|| nt|rnmalik: Brd 30 that 3NT played by N here goes off the other room as @DQ was covered hahaha@H@H|pg|| nt|dbl me: Yes, that wd be a much better hand|pg|| pc|d4|pc|h6|pg|| pc|dQ|nt|rnmalik: sry|pg|| pc|dK|pc|d5|pc|d2|pg|| pc|d8|pc|d6|pc|d9|pc|c7|pg|| nt|brgpro: why is N still playing?|pg|| mc|9|nt|iverson200: board 30 was a push, Wang could underlead his @c for a set|pg|| nt|iverson200: so a missed chance for China on board 30|pg|| nt|dbl me: Thx gentlemen...enjoyed, as always :-)|pg|| nt|iverson200: that is the end of this Round, thanks everyone|pg|| nt|iverson200: thanks Jack and Richard, and of course operator and kibitzers|pg|| nt|iverson200: we will go to the other room|pg|| nt|ahalim: g zwak defence-nya|pg|| pg|| qx|c32|st||md|2SKJ4HATDJ76543C64,S63H6543DA92CK852,SAQT9HKQJ72DQCJT7,S8752H98DKT8CAQ93|sv|e|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2D!|mb|p|mb|3H|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|s5|pc|s4|pc|s6|pc|sT|pg|| pc|dQ|pc|d8|pc|d3|pc|dA|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c7|pc|c9|pc|c4|pg|| pc|c2|pc|cT|pc|cQ|pc|c6|pg|| pc|dK|pc|d4|pc|d2|pc|h2|pg|| pc|h7|pc|h8|nt|iverson200: @d Q is a clever move, as his real intention is to get a @c ruff|pg|| mc|10|nt|iverson200: running scores http://www.worldbridge.org/repository/tourn/bali.13/microsite/RunningScores/Asp/RoundTeamsConditStatClassicMod.asp?qtournid=980|pg|| nt|iverson200: Thanks all, see you in 1 hour and 10 minutes|pg|| pg||