BBO Discussion Forums: a new take on 1m-1M-2NT - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

a new take on 1m-1M-2NT GUBidding

#1 User is offline   virgosrock 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 782
  • Joined: 2015-April-07

Posted 2018-June-06, 08:30


0

#2 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2018-June-06, 09:53

The 2NT rebid is obviously wrong, was chosen because every rebid is 'wrong'. Probably better in GIB's case to just have a 3NT rebid be allowable on a 6 card suit that isn't solid. I don't think that's actually the best bid (better is like 2C then 2N), but I think it's right to keep GIB from opening or rebidding notrump with a 6 card minor in general.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#3 User is offline   virgosrock 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 782
  • Joined: 2015-April-07

Posted 2018-June-06, 09:56

View Postjdonn, on 2018-June-06, 09:53, said:

The 2NT rebid is obviously wrong, was chosen because every rebid is 'wrong'. Probably better in GIB's case to just have a 3NT rebid be allowable on a 6 card suit that isn't solid. I don't think that's actually the best bid (better is like 2C then 2N), but I think it's right to keep GIB from opening or rebidding notrump with a 6 card minor in general.


ACK (=acknowledged)

vrock
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users