BBO Discussion Forums: Extreme Burn's Law violation - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Extreme Burn's Law violation

#1 User is offline   Stephen Tu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,814
  • Joined: 2003-May-14

Posted 2017-October-06, 09:29



- I prefer 2H to 1nt though I guess 1nt isn't egregious. I actually open 2H but I guess the bot probably has higher stds for suit quality than I do.
- 2C is nuts
- passing 2C is also nuts, surely 2H or 2S is indicated at this point.
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,700
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Enschede, the Netherlands
  • Interests:matching LaTeX delimiters :(

Posted 2017-October-06, 09:37

Just when we thought GIB couldn't get worse.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   johnu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,454
  • Joined: 2008-September-10

Posted 2017-October-06, 12:05

View Postgwnn, on 2017-October-06, 09:37, said:

Just when we thought GIB couldn't get worse.


Speak for yourself :D
1

#4 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,975
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2017-October-11, 12:18

I will have it reported.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users