BBO Discussion Forums: GIB passed another cuebid :( - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

GIB passed another cuebid :(

#1 User is offline   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 338
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2017-June-18, 21:30



As a human, what would you bid over 4? I wasn't really sure, but slam seemed very likely and I thought I'd hedge my bets by allowing GIB to pick a suit.

GIBs default is to pass if it doesn't know what to do, despite the description being forcing. Perhaps it should default to something else.
0

#2 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,541
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2017-June-19, 01:39

Posted Image
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"





0

#3 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,394
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2017-June-19, 10:34

So GIB's description is that 5 is forcing to 5N and shows two or fewer .

How can it pass then. At least it must be made to realize that it can punt the ball back being forced to 5NT!

Such a shame that these things can't be made to bid better and at least be forced when its explanation is forcing and it clearly is leaving PD in a joke contract!
0

#4 User is offline   steve2005 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,657
  • Joined: 2010-April-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Canada
  • Interests:Bridge duh!

Posted 2017-June-19, 14:11

According to Gibs reckoning partnerships has 33 pts so why didn't Gib bid slam?
Sarcasm is a state of mind
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users