BBO Discussion Forums: Big Hand - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Big Hand

#1 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,418
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2017-May-20, 08:51


The weak 2H could be undisciplined at favourable. Your go.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#2 User is offline   eagles123 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Joined: 2011-June-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK Near London
  • Interests:Crystal Palace

Posted 2017-May-20, 09:08

DOUBLE
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
0

#3 User is offline   SteveMoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 2012-May-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati Unit 124
  • Interests:Family, Travel, Bridge Tournaments and Writing. Youth Bridge

Posted 2017-May-20, 09:13

I will double and over partner's:
4♠: rebid 5♥ showing fit, control, and an escape at 5♠
4N: I will rebid 5N asking partner for their better minor - I expect 2-1-5-5 and hope for xx x Axxxx Qxxxx :rolleyes:
5♣: rebid 5♦. 5♥ is too rich here.
5♦: Pass - if partner's ♦ are really 2 cards longer than ♣ (no 4N bid) and 3 or fewer ♠s, I fear we will not benefit from shape advantages.
5♥: Partner had a strong pass! 7♦ for me.
5♠: 6♥ exploring 7♠
6♣, 6♦: Raise to 7.
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
0

#4 User is offline   alok c 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 2015-February-25

Posted 2017-May-20, 11:55

6♦.This hand is too good, I will gamble because as little as 3 small ♦s & 2 black Qs/ 1 black Q with length may lead it to LS.
0

#5 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2017-May-20, 13:27

View Postlamford, on 2017-May-20, 08:51, said:


The weak 2H could be undisciplined at favourable. Your go.

I rank
  • Double = T/O. And pass 4♠.
  • 5♦ = NAT. Should be playable.
  • 4N = UNT?
  • 5♥ = CUE. Brave.
  • 6♦ = NAT. Brave and committal.

Guthrie.tech
0

#6 User is offline   Lovera 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,723
  • Joined: 2014-January-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bari (ITALIA)
  • Interests:I'm also on YOUTUBE with a channel of music songs .

Posted 2017-May-20, 13:36

View Postalok c, on 2017-May-20, 11:55, said:

6♦.This hand is too good, I will gamble because as little as 3 small ♦s & 2 black Qs/ 1 black Q with length may lead it to LS.

Ok, but if " This hand is too good" maybe is necessary don't share your lucky.
2

#7 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,418
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2017-May-21, 08:10

View PostLovera, on 2017-May-20, 13:36, said:

Ok, but if " This hand is too good" maybe is necessary don't share your lucky.

A simulation suggests that Double is likely to be the winning action. 4S is more likely to make than 6D, although both are odds on. If partner has xxxx xxx xx xxxx then double rates to gain IMPs.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#8 User is offline   Lovera 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,723
  • Joined: 2014-January-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bari (ITALIA)
  • Interests:I'm also on YOUTUBE with a channel of music songs .

Posted 2017-May-21, 09:32

View Postlamford, on 2017-May-21, 08:10, said:

A simulation suggests that Double is likely to be the winning action. 4S is more likely to make than 6D, although both are odds on. If partner has xxxx xxx xx xxxx then double rates to gain IMPs.

I usually don't believe at coincidences and simmetry points as here (20 Hcp in an hand can be read also if distributed) and probably opp can have less few. What's happen for 5♦ ?
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users