BBO Discussion Forums: weak two ATB - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 4 Pages +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

weak two ATB RS example hand from weak two thread

#61 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,023
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2017-May-18, 14:03

Would anyone else double 4S in this auction with that East hand? I wouldn't.
If something cannot go on forever, it will stop. - Herb Stein
0

#62 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,678
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2017-May-18, 15:39

I find these weak 2 discussions very amusing.

There was a day - about 30 years ago - when I considered a weak 2 bid to be a highly constructive call. I would never open a weak 2 bid with less than QJTxxx and, if the suit were that weak, I had compensating values on the outside.

Then I discovered something. When used obstructively, weak 2s (and higher level preempts) were very effective weapons against the opponents getting to their contracts. I remember distinctly playing in a North American championship pair event opening 2 vul against not on QJxxx. My opponents got to 3NT. Declarer naturally assumed that I had 6 diamonds for my bid and did not hold up enough times in the suit. This got us a near top.

Since then I have adopted a very aggressive preempting style. With one of my regular partners, our nonvul weak 2 bids are typically 5 cards (we usually open 3 if we have 6 cards). Not only that, the 5 cards can be xxxxx! It is amazing how well this works.

So, I find these discussions of the need for good suits and such so 1980s.



0

#63 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,037
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2017-May-18, 16:29

East hand posted to BridgeWinners as a Bidding Poll
0

#64 User is offline   masse24 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 290
  • Joined: 2009-April-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago Suburbs

Posted 2017-May-18, 16:51

View Postnige1, on 2017-May-18, 16:29, said:

East hand posted to BridgeWinners as a Bidding Poll

Already posted--four days ago--as a BW bidding poll here: Pass or Double?

Pass is currently running at 96%.
“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” George Carlin
0

#65 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,023
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2017-May-18, 17:25

View PostArtK78, on 2017-May-18, 15:39, said:

I find these weak 2 discussions very amusing.

There was a day - about 30 years ago - when I considered a weak 2 bid to be a highly constructive call. I would never open a weak 2 bid with less than QJTxxx and, if the suit were that weak, I had compensating values on the outside.

Then I discovered something. When used obstructively, weak 2s (and higher level preempts) were very effective weapons against the opponents getting to their contracts. I remember distinctly playing in a North American championship pair event opening 2 vul against not on QJxxx. My opponents got to 3NT. Declarer naturally assumed that I had 6 diamonds for my bid and did not hold up enough times in the suit. This got us a near top.

Since then I have adopted a very aggressive preempting style. With one of my regular partners, our nonvul weak 2 bids are typically 5 cards (we usually open 3 if we have 6 cards). Not only that, the 5 cards can be xxxxx! It is amazing how well this works.

So, I find these discussions of the need for good suits and such so 1980s 1960s.


FYP :P
If something cannot go on forever, it will stop. - Herb Stein
0

#66 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,678
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2017-May-19, 12:53

View PostWinstonm, on 2017-May-18, 17:25, said:

FYP :P


I should have said 1970s, as my bridge life goes back to 1972.





0

#67 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,023
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2017-May-19, 14:22

View PostArtK78, on 2017-May-19, 12:53, said:

I should have said 1970s, as my bridge life goes back to 1972.

:D
If something cannot go on forever, it will stop. - Herb Stein
0

#68 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,659
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2017-May-19, 14:29

View PostArtK78, on 2017-May-19, 12:53, said:

I should have said 1970s, as my bridge life goes back to 1972.


Art how old are you? I thought you are younger than me or same age.Posted Image
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"





0

#69 User is offline   johnu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,521
  • Joined: 2008-September-10

Posted 2017-May-19, 15:48

View Postmasse24, on 2017-May-18, 16:51, said:

Already posted--four days ago--as a BW bidding poll here: Pass or Double?

Pass is currently running at 96%.


One poll says to assume matchpoints, the other IMPs. A discussion about doubling at IMPs versus matchpoints deserves a separate topic.
0

#70 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,037
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2017-May-19, 16:12

View Postjohnu, on 2017-May-19, 15:48, said:

One poll says to assume matchpoints, the other IMPs. A discussion about doubling at IMPs versus matchpoints deserves a separate topic.

I (mistakenly?) assumed that it was Pairs after reading Redspawn's OP.
IMO,
  • It's close between Pass and Double
  • If opponents never make doubled contracts, then you're not doubling enough.

0

Share this topic:


  • 4 Pages +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users