BBO Discussion Forums: A tough defence - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

A tough defence You can work it out

#1 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,417
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2017-March-05, 19:35


Camrose (Home Internationals in UK, a strong event), Wales v Northern Ireland.

Partner leads the ace of diamonds. You are East. Plan the defence and give reasons!
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#2 User is offline   rhm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,090
  • Joined: 2005-June-27

Posted 2017-March-06, 05:13

Declarer can not have five hearts and six clubs, because this would give partner too many HCP in spades and diamonds and anyway partner does not hold seven good diamonds for this bidding.
So declarer is likely balanced with around 19 HCP with 3 diamonds and four hearts.
Declarer is either 3=4=3=3 or 2=4=3=4.
This means declarer has one diamond ruff, 4 club tricks, 4 trump tricks and a spade trick.
We probably have 2 diamond and a spade trick.

One possibility is to play us for 2 spade tricks.
This would require declarer to have

Kx AKTx QJx AQxx or Kxx AKTx QJx AQx

However, this defense would hardly be tough.

More likely we do not have a second spade trick, in which case the fourth trick can only come from trumps.
This will require partner to have the heart ten and the diamond queen and declarers spade trick must be slow. That requires partner to have the spade ace.

Give declarer KQ AKxx Jxx AQxx or KQx AKxx Jxx AQx and we can force him
Dump your diamond king and partner can play 3 rounds of diamonds forcing dummy to ruff.
Partner will play another diamond when he comes in with the ace of spades.
If partner has the ten of hearts we have a trump trick or declarer draws trumps immediately and never gets a spade trick.

Rainer Herrmann
0

#3 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,417
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2017-March-06, 13:40

View Postrhm, on 2017-March-06, 05:13, said:

Give declarer KQ AKxx Jxx AQxx or KQx AKxx Jxx AQx and we can force him

That was declarer's hand and your defence works, but was not found at any table. Well done again, Rainer!
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users