Help
http://tinyurl.com/jxjv598
This is a recurring theme but I have rarely seen it so extreme. I wonder what went wrong. 4♦ meant as a some kind of COG but taken as a sign off? Could it really be a simulation fluke?
Page 1 of 1
Desperate GIB tries to rescue partner
#1
- The Abbess
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,087
- Joined: 2004-April-22
- Gender:Female
- Location:UK
Posted 2016-October-01, 16:00
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#2
- - - T98765432 AQT8
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 15,085
- Joined: 2005-June-23
- Gender:Male
- Location:Las Vegas, NV
Posted 2016-October-01, 20:34
I think the real problem here is the pass of partner's 3NT is not defined. It has to be limited so that pulling later doesn't show a good hand. Then west wouldn't bid, 4 card suit or not.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,612
- Joined: 2009-September-28
- Gender:Male
- Location:China
Posted 2016-October-04, 05:59
jdonn, on 2016-October-01, 20:34, said:
I think the real problem here is the pass of partner's 3NT is not defined. It has to be limited so that pulling later doesn't show a good hand. Then west wouldn't bid, 4 card suit or not.
I think your opinion is not a realistic imagination.
First see Helene_t hand.
Second see my basic Gib hand.
Even if the pass of partner's 3NT is defined. It has to be limited so that pulling later doesn't show a good hand. Then actually west would bid 4 card suit for sure.
As we know rebid-4♣ after opp's double usually shows weakish hand, however you have no way to limit TP evaluation.
Now see Helene_t hand, 3♣ has promised 14+hcp, when west really holds 11+hcp, they have no way to sign off at four level for ever and ever.
This be a real problem in fact.
TP is not a good evaluation.
Page 1 of 1