BBO Discussion Forums: Reverse Drury - system notes incorrect - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Reverse Drury - system notes incorrect

#1 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,755
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2016-September-15, 19:09



The GIB System Notes page says:

Quote

3NT: 6322 shape, one-round force, less than 18 total points.


This appears to be incorrect.

Incidentally, 3NT is a better contract. But this is basic GIB, so no simulations were involved. Just the notes wrong, I suspect.
Reverse engineering GIB, part 1: A treatise on the insanity of bidding simulations
0

#2 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2016-September-19, 09:45

Obviously GIB should be able to pass this bid if it wants, so I would say it's the system notes that aren't quite right, not the bidding rule.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users