I admit 4♥ is big wrong. I like to call 4♥ as 4-losers convention, it is excellent.
But 5♣ is too magic ,now you see its definition is 5+♣,5+♦,3-♥,3-♠".
Is it single long suit or two long suits? How about its logc relation on 5♣?
Posted 2016-May-20, 03:54
Posted 2016-May-20, 04:05