BBO Discussion Forums: Favourable - are you finished yet? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Favourable - are you finished yet?

Poll: Favourable - are you finished yet? (12 member(s) have cast votes)

What now/before?

  1. Pass (12 votes [100.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 100.00%

  2. 5S (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. Would have bid 5S the first time round (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Other (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,907
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-July-12, 08:28



IMPs with 4 randoms at the table.
The "4 is a transfer to 4" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#2 User is offline   eagles123 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Joined: 2011-June-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK Near London
  • Interests:Crystal Palace

Posted 2015-July-12, 09:30

Yes I'm finished, we've said our hand with 4 spades. Who knows, maybe 5h is down and 5 spades is a phantom, maybe 5h makes but 5s is -4 , maybe they can make slam and 5s pushes them into it

I mean say we do bid 5 spades and it comes back around to us at 6H what then?
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
0

#3 User is offline   eagles123 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Joined: 2011-June-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK Near London
  • Interests:Crystal Palace

Posted 2015-July-12, 09:30

Yes I'm finished, we've said our hand with 4 spades. Who knows, maybe 5h is down and 5 spades is a phantom, maybe they can make slam and 5s pushes them into it

I mean say we do bid 5 spades and it comes back around to us at 6H what then?
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
0

#4 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,907
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-July-12, 09:42

Eight spades
The "4 is a transfer to 4" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#5 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2015-July-12, 11:47

Pass. You've already made a max preempt with your hand. Bidding again is bidding your hand twice. It may give the opponents a fielder's choice of doubling you or bidding on. The worst case would be to go for -500 or -800 and find that they can't make 5 .
0

#6 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,835
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2015-July-12, 12:45

bridge is a partnership game and partner, who sees the vulnerability and the bidding chose to pass. We have done a better job of describing our hand to him than he has to us, since there are a host of hands on which defending 5H undoubled is best. Sure, bidding COULD work well, but it is masterminding. It's not like we have a 9th spade.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#7 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Göttingen, Germany
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2015-July-12, 14:16

My partner kept making these calls and I kept being pissed off. I can see the vulnerability too thanks p. Leave me alone.

Edit: I do think there is such a thing as 4S and 5S but I don't like overdoing it.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#8 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,907
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-July-12, 14:49

Everyone agrees with 4 the first time around, I take it?
The "4 is a transfer to 4" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#9 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,516
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-July-12, 15:28

View PostJinksy, on 2015-July-12, 14:49, said:

Everyone agrees with 4 the first time around, I take it?

I do. This is not a case where you should consider 5S first round, even with a bit more distribution, IMO.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#10 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,653
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2015-July-12, 16:32

View Postrmnka447, on 2015-July-12, 11:47, said:

Pass. You've already made a max preempt with your hand. Bidding again is bidding your hand twice. It may give the opponents a fielder's choice of doubling you or bidding on. The worst case would be to go for -500 or -800 and find that they can't make 5 .


It may be worse if they can then bid slam which they have not done so far (just a thought since we have no reason to assume we can beat 7h)
0

#11 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,907
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-July-13, 15:13

View Postcherdano, on 2015-July-12, 15:28, said:

I do. This is not a case where you should consider 5S first round, even with a bit more distribution, IMO.


What sort of tweaks to the hand would tempt you?
The "4 is a transfer to 4" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#12 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,835
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2015-July-13, 15:20

I can't imagine bidding more than 4 on the first round unless I had a hand on which I expected to make my bid.

Even tho partner is a passed hand, there is no reason to assume that they can bid a slam over 4 or, and this is fairly important, that they can make anything they do bid, whether it be at the 5 level or higher. Partner is allowed to be very short in spades and to hold enough nuisance stuff that they are doomed if they bid.

That isn't to say that I can't see bidding 5 if they bid over 4. However, I would need a much better playing hand than this one. KQJ10xxxxx void QJxx void is certainly a hand on which I would bid again, as a perhaps over-the-top example.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
1

#13 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,516
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-July-13, 16:57

View PostJinksy, on 2015-July-13, 15:13, said:

What sort of tweaks to the hand would tempt you?

Maybe I formulated this badly. I am not sure there is a hand that would tempt me to bid 5 right away - it would have to be very extreme. But there are hands where I would be tempted to bid 5 if they compete over 4.

To modify Mike's example just a little bit - if you had KQJTxxxx - QJTx x then it seems right to compete over 5 or 5. But it's almost 50% that LHO has a doubleton spade, in which case you are quite likely to buy it in 4 (maybe doubled). You might also buy it there when he has a singleton, as he'll typically double rather than bid with 1444 or 1534 or 0544 and opener will usually pass.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users