BBO Discussion Forums: Claim what is correct? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Claim what is correct? 2/1 ACBL

#21 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,420
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2015-January-29, 12:07

 Bbradley62, on 2015-January-29, 11:38, said:

<snip> Director spastically thought <snip>

As Tiger Woods found to his cost, the adverb therein is not regarded as any more appropriate in today's world than Benedict Cumberbatch's recent use of "coloured".
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#22 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,420
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2015-January-29, 12:11

 dickiegera, on 2015-January-28, 17:26, said:

Clubs had never been played up to this point.
East was dealt a stiff J of clubs.
North and South never discarded any clubs.
Don't know if west had discarded any clubs.

One of those statements has to be untrue, and I suspect it is the last. If the first three are true, you know that West began with five small clubs and must have discarded at least one. If you had written, "Don't know if West had discarded more than one club", then that could be true.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#23 User is offline   TylerE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,760
  • Joined: 2006-January-30

Posted 2015-January-29, 13:23

 barmar, on 2015-January-29, 09:30, said:

I suspect the idea is that the only "normal" play starts with cashing a high club in the North hand, at which time the stiff J will appear. So even though declarer couldn't actually know that the clubs would run at the time he made the claim, the distribution is such that it doesn't matter.

But the claim statement suggests that declarer also thought the spade was good.


I more or less agree with that and I still think 4 tricks for declarer is probably right, I'm just a bit less happy about it. My general view on claims is that the purpose is to speed the game up in uninteresting positions and I generally support the idea that that means play high cards first and anything that turns up turns up, not that a claim is an excuse for the local SB to go nuts.
0

#24 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,594
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2015-January-29, 15:59

 lamford, on 2015-January-29, 12:11, said:

One of those statements has to be untrue, and I suspect it is the last. If the first three are true, you know that West began with five small clubs and must have discarded at least one. If you had written, "Don't know if West had discarded more than one club", then that could be true.

"Don't know if west discarded any clubs" has, I suspect, more to do with memory than with whether West must have discarded at least one.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users