Help
Instead of using 2D as a weak 6 card suit I have a funny alternative.
Since Im a great fan of Pink Floyd I call it Crazy Diamond.
Its minimum 5-5 in any suits with 6-10 HCP.
2H-2S weak respons-Opener passes or bids lowest suit.
3C-3D-3H-3S own long suit for play
2NT forcing
After 2NT:
3C minimum with one higher suit
3D minimum with a major
3H minimum with both majors
3S maximum with a minor
3NT maximum with both minors
4C maximum with H
4D maximum with H
4H maximum with both majors
Page 1 of 1
Crazy Diamond Weak 2 suiter
#3
- mmm Duvel
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-July-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Belgium
- Interests:Duvel, Whisky
Posted 2015-January-09, 11:50
I prefer Wilkosz for better preemptive options, as well as better slam bidding. The extra possiblitiy (both minors) isn't worth it imo.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,531
- Joined: 2005-October-09
- Location:Netherlands
Posted 2015-January-09, 12:28
Not entirely surprising, there is already a system called "Crazy Diamond". It was/is played -quite successfully- by, among others, the Kaiser brothers from the Netherlands.
I am no expert, but if I recall correctly, it is a strong club system where the 1M openings promise a four or at least six card major, but never five. Hands with a five card major are opened 1♦. It used to be popular among some players (Cees Kaiser and his partner, Toine van Hooff, and his partner, ...) at the Star bridge club (Utrecht, the Netherlands) when I played there in 1997.
Rik
I am no expert, but if I recall correctly, it is a strong club system where the 1M openings promise a four or at least six card major, but never five. Hands with a five card major are opened 1♦. It used to be popular among some players (Cees Kaiser and his partner, Toine van Hooff, and his partner, ...) at the Star bridge club (Utrecht, the Netherlands) when I played there in 1997.
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#5
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 134
- Joined: 2006-February-09
Posted 2015-January-09, 20:31
When I started playing bridge 45 years ago I played something similar called "Polish Scissors". It was opening 2NT with similar distribution but that took away opening strong balanced hands. Also it forced to the 3 level, with 2D you can stop with 2H or 2S when partner is too weak to force. Anyway Im very interested to have opinions from good players and also suggestions to improve the convention.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-March-07
- Gender:Male
- Location:Laos
- Interests:Wagner and Bridge
Posted 2015-January-10, 03:33
Free, on 2015-January-09, 11:50, said:
I prefer Wilkosz for better preemptive options, as well as better slam bidding. The extra possiblitiy (both minors) isn't worth it imo.
I agree.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,942
- Joined: 2005-January-28
- Gender:Male
- Location:Cologne, Germany
- Interests:Sleeping, Eating
Posted 2015-January-10, 07:52
Free, on 2015-January-09, 11:50, said:
I prefer Wilkosz for better preemptive options, as well as better slam bidding. The extra possiblitiy (both minors) isn't worth it imo.
Yes, especially the possibility to respond 4♣/4♦ when you have both majors, allowing you to play the contract from either side.
You should play 3♣ = both minors if you really want to have an opening for them as well.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,667
- Joined: 2006-May-18
- Gender:Not Telling
Posted 2015-January-11, 11:55
UdcaDenny, on 2015-January-09, 20:31, said:
When I started playing bridge 45 years ago I played something similar called "Polish Scissors". It was opening 2NT
Just so you know, Polish Scissors is a 2♠ opening. Chris Ryall mentions it in his Weak 2 archive and there is a more complete write up here.
(-: Zel :-)
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,951
- Joined: 2008-April-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Sussex, England
Posted 2015-January-13, 04:46
Zelandakh, on 2015-January-11, 11:55, said:
Just so you know, Polish Scissors is a 2♠ opening. Chris Ryall mentions it in his Weak 2 archive and there is a more complete write up here.
The first link is www.chrisryall.net/bridge/weak.two/brown.htm#polscis, clickable here
"Pass is your friend" - my brother in law - who likes to bid a lot.
Page 1 of 1