BBO Discussion Forums: ujnbalanced hand vs nt opening - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

ujnbalanced hand vs nt opening

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2014-December-14, 04:35



You can try the hand here: http://bridgegod.com...id=441&setid=19
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#2 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,909
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-December-14, 15:39

I'm confused by this one. I don't see info on what continuations we're using, so I tried 3♦, which landed us in a cold 3N. Are we supposed to bid to 6♣ somehow?
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#3 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2014-December-14, 16:33

you can use what you like. the easiest way is to bid 2 spades forcing, so partner bids 3♣. But you need to be used to play that.

at the table I bid 3♦, but reopened 3NT with 4♣, in the end I landed on 6♦ which is a terrible contract, but could make with good play. 6 ♣ is solid, but many players are going down somehow.
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#4 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2014-December-14, 18:56

why isn't partner's 4 diamond bid preference? 3nt doesn't deny 3 card diamond support. in fact i dare say p could have 4 card diamond support with a sufficiently softly stocked hand in hearts and clubs.
0

#5 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,080
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2014-December-14, 20:10

Excellent play problem. And also a good bidding problem to try your NT system.

View Postwyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


View Postrbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#6 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,909
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-December-15, 03:40

Is the NT system described somewhere? I saw some tips at the top, but mostly was just guessing both at my own bids and his.
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#7 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2014-December-15, 06:30

View Postwank, on 2014-December-14, 18:56, said:

why isn't partner's 4 diamond bid preference? 3nt doesn't deny 3 card diamond support. in fact i dare say p could have 4 card diamond support with a sufficiently softly stocked hand in hearts and clubs.


I though the same as you, and so I played 6♦ with a lucky make. 4♦ should be 3♦ stablishing a fit. Partner was not on the same wavelength. Later on I regret not giving a shot at bidding 6♣ which should be a choice of slams.

When you offer clubs the bidding should be this:

4♦ = I have 3 diamonds
4M = I have 4+ clubs, control
4NT = STOP
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#8 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2014-December-15, 09:36

View PostHanoi5, on 2014-December-14, 20:10, said:

Excellent play problem.


Which contract, 6♦? Because 6♣ is a cakewalk :)
0

#9 User is offline   manudude03 

  • - - A AKQJT9876543
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,610
  • Joined: 2007-October-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-December-15, 11:34

I noticed in the results that someone made 6N, so I had a look. He set up the diamonds, and then after giving up a diamond, the defence led the only card to let it through lol.
Wayne Somerville
0

#10 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2014-December-15, 17:01

yeah, and there was a 490 as well, but I have changed defence after that so it is no longer possible (I hope)
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users